• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向患者参与药物研发和监管科学的范式转变:研讨会论文集与评论

A Paradigm Shift Towards Patient Involvement in Medicines Development and Regulatory Science: Workshop Proceedings and Commentary.

作者信息

Borup Gitte, Bach Karin Friis, Schmiegelow Merete, Wallach-Kildemoes Helle, Bjerrum Ole Jannik, Westergaard Niels

机构信息

1 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

2 Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 May;50(3):304-311. doi: 10.1177/2168479015622668.

DOI:10.1177/2168479015622668
PMID:30227074
Abstract

The Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS) and Biopeople at the University of Copenhagen held a workshop in May 2015 titled "Patient Involvement in Medicines Development and Approvals: A Paradigm Shift Towards True Patient Impact in Medicines Development and Regulatory Science" that acknowledged the importance of having patients more involved in the entire process of medicines research and development (R&D) and life cycle management. Four key stakeholders, representing patients, academia, industry, and regulatory authorities, each gave their view and perspective on the status and challenges of current patient involvement. From the 3 breakout sessions, it was concluded that patient-reported outcomes (ie, the report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else), was considered as an important tool when deciding endpoints. It was agreed that professionalization of the patient within medicine R&D to some extent would be necessary for obtaining influence. However, the industry should also seek to accommodate to the patient instead of waiting passively for patients to become educated. A much better organized and stronger involvement of patients was called for. However, this should not only rely on goodwill, but should preferably be implemented by legal requirements, so as to secure compliance by all stakeholders. An independent platform with the purpose of providing access to patient experience was proposed. A research and educational center such as CORS, which was founded on cross-sectorial and cross-disciplinary cooperation, is an example of an institution that could be a good starting point for hosting such a platform.

摘要

哥本哈根监管科学中心(CORS)与哥本哈根大学的生物人才组织于2015年5月举办了一场题为“患者参与药物研发与审批:向药物研发和监管科学中真正的患者影响转变的范式”的研讨会,该研讨会承认让患者更多地参与药物研发(R&D)和生命周期管理的整个过程具有重要意义。代表患者、学术界、产业界和监管机构的四个关键利益相关者分别就当前患者参与的现状和挑战发表了各自的观点和看法。从3个分组会议得出的结论是,患者报告的结果(即直接来自患者的关于其健康状况的报告,无需临床医生或其他任何人对患者的回答进行解读)在决定终点时被视为一项重要工具。大家一致认为,为了获得影响力,在某种程度上有必要使患者在药物研发中实现专业化。然而,产业界也应寻求适应患者,而不是被动等待患者接受教育。有人呼吁对患者进行更有序、更有力的参与。然而,这不应仅依赖于善意,而最好通过法律要求来实施,以确保所有利益相关者都能遵守。有人提议设立一个独立平台,目的是提供获取患者体验的途径。像CORS这样基于跨部门和跨学科合作建立的研究与教育中心,就是一个可以作为托管这样一个平台良好起点的机构的例子。

相似文献

1
A Paradigm Shift Towards Patient Involvement in Medicines Development and Regulatory Science: Workshop Proceedings and Commentary.向患者参与药物研发和监管科学的范式转变:研讨会论文集与评论
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 May;50(3):304-311. doi: 10.1177/2168479015622668.
2
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).第二届理论与产业研讨会会议录(2007年6月12日至14日,奥地利维也纳埃尔温·薛定谔研究所)
J Phys Condens Matter. 2008 Feb 13;20(6):060301. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/06/060301. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
3
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
4
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
5
EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development (R&D); Guidance for Pharmaceutical Industry-Led Medicines R&D.EUPATI患者参与药物研发(R&D)指南;制药行业主导的药物研发指南。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 9;5:270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00270. eCollection 2018.
6
EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Processes.欧洲制药工业协会联合会与药物研发中的患者:患者参与监管流程指南
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 17;5:230. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00230. eCollection 2018.
7
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
Towards a European strategy for medicines research (2014-2020): The EUFEPS position paper on Horizon 2020.迈向欧洲药品研究战略(2014-2020 年):欧盟制药工业协会联合会关于“地平线 2020”计划的立场文件。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Dec 18;47(5):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
Pharmaceutical Regulatory Framework in Ethiopia: A Critical Evaluation of Its Legal Basis and Implementation.埃塞俄比亚的药品监管框架:对其法律基础与实施情况的批判性评估
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016 May;26(3):259-76. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i3.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-enabled social media listening to inform early patient-focused drug development: perspectives on approaches and strategies.借助人工智能的社交媒体倾听,为以患者为中心的早期药物研发提供信息:方法与策略的视角
Front Digit Health. 2024 Nov 20;6:1459201. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1459201. eCollection 2024.
2
Heart failure patients' perspectives on treatment outcomes and unmet medical needs: A qualitative preference study.心力衰竭患者对治疗结果和未满足医疗需求的看法:一项定性偏好研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3075-3084. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14891. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER): A Step Toward Ethical, Relevant, and Truly Participatory Clinical Research in India.
印度临床研究患者权益倡导者组织(PACER):迈向印度伦理、相关且真正参与式临床研究的一步。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58454. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58454. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Regulatory science: The need for empowering Indian innovation.监管科学:增强印度创新能力的必要性。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Jun;154(6):770-775. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1665_19.
5
Patient and Public Involvement in Dermatology Research: A Review.患者和公众参与皮肤科研究:综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 May;23(3):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00680-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Diabetes patient's pharmacovigilance knowledge and risk perception: the influence of being part of a patient organisation.糖尿病患者的药物警戒知识与风险认知:患者组织成员身份的影响
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Sep 4;11:2042098620953935. doi: 10.1177/2042098620953935. eCollection 2020.
7
Communicating Adverse Drug Reaction Insights Through Patient Organizations: Experiences from a Pilot Study in the Netherlands.通过患者组织传递药物不良反应洞察:荷兰一项试点研究的经验。
Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):745-749. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00932-5.
8
Gathering Structured Patient Insight to Drive the PRO Strategy in COPD: Patient-Centric Drug Development from Theory to Practice.收集结构化患者洞察以推动 COPD 的 PRO 策略:从理论到实践的以患者为中心的药物研发。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01134-x. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
9
Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: A literature review.评估药品研发中“患者参与举措的回报”:文献综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/hex.12951. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
The Role of European Patient Organizations in Pharmacovigilance.欧洲患者组织在药物警戒中的作用。
Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;42(4):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0748-x.