Suppr超能文献

加拿大癫痫联盟中与精神性非癫痫性发作相关的经验:一项调查描述了神经科医生和癫痫专家的当前实践。

Experience of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in the Canadian league against epilepsy: A survey describing current practices by neurologists and epileptologists.

机构信息

Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program, College of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program, College of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Epilepsy Program, Neurology Section, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Seizure. 2018 Oct;61:227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Sep 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are one of the most common differential diagnoses of epilepsy. Our objective is to describe current medical care in Canada and identify patterns of practice and service gaps.

METHODS

In 2015, a 36-question survey was sent via email to the 131 members of the Canadian League Against Epilepsy. The questions were designed after literature review and discussion with the ILAE PNES Task Force. Questions were separated into 5 sections: 1) the role of the respondent and their exposure to PNES, 2) diagnostic methods, 3) management of PNES, 4) etiological factors, and 5) problems accessing health care.

RESULTS

Sixty-two questionnaires were analyzed (response rate: 47%). Most respondents were epileptologists (76%). The majority of respondents personally diagnosed PNES and communicated the diagnosis to the patient, but only 55% provided follow-up within their practice and only 50% recommended or arranged treatment. Many (35%) were either unfamiliar with the diagnosis of PNES or inexperienced in arranging or offering treatment. Most (79%) provided follow-up to patients with concomitant epilepsy, but when PNES was the sole diagnosis follow-up rates were low. Although 84% of respondents felt that individualized psychological therapy was the most effective treatment, 40% of patients were not referred to psychotherapy and in most cases availability such therapy was low (30-60%).

CONCLUSIONS

Canadian health professionals' understanding of PNES mostly reflects current international expert opinion. Once diagnosis is made however, the majority of patients are discharged from neurological services without appropriate psychological care.

摘要

目的

心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)是癫痫最常见的鉴别诊断之一。我们的目的是描述加拿大目前的医疗服务,并确定实践模式和服务差距。

方法

2015 年,通过电子邮件向加拿大癫痫联盟的 131 名成员发送了一份包含 36 个问题的调查问卷。这些问题是在文献回顾和与 ILAE PNES 工作组讨论后设计的。问题分为 5 个部分:1)受访者的角色及其对 PNES 的接触程度,2)诊断方法,3)PNES 的管理,4)病因因素,5)获得医疗保健的问题。

结果

分析了 62 份问卷(应答率:47%)。大多数受访者是癫痫专家(76%)。大多数受访者亲自诊断 PNES 并向患者传达诊断结果,但只有 55%在其实践中提供随访,只有 50%建议或安排治疗。许多人(35%)对 PNES 的诊断不熟悉或在安排或提供治疗方面缺乏经验。大多数(79%)为伴有癫痫的患者提供随访,但当 PNES 是唯一诊断时,随访率较低。尽管 84%的受访者认为个体化心理治疗是最有效的治疗方法,但 40%的患者未被转介到心理治疗,而且大多数情况下这种治疗的可用性较低(30%-60%)。

结论

加拿大卫生专业人员对 PNES 的理解主要反映了当前的国际专家意见。然而,一旦做出诊断,大多数患者在没有适当心理护理的情况下从神经科服务中出院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验