Iles-Caven Yasmin, Golding Jean, Ellis Genette, Gregory Steven, Nowicki Stephen
Centre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Data Brief. 2018 Jul 10;19:2195-2204. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.014. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Locus of control (LOC) measures an individual׳s expectancy regarding their ability to affect what happens to them based on their behavior. Those with an internal LOC (ILOC) believe their own behavior influences what happens to them. Those with an external LOC (ELOC) perceive that what happens to them is beyond their control (i.e. determined by luck, fate, chance or powerful others) [1]. A vast amount of research (mainly cross-sectional) suggests that an ELOC is associated with many adverse personal, social, academic and health outcomes. LOC data were uniquely collected from over 12,000 pregnant women and their partners enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). The LOC measure used was a shortened version of the adult version of the Nowicki-Strickland Internal-External locus of control scale. This was administered to the mothers within self-completion questionnaires at three-time points: during pregnancy, at 6 and at 18 years post-partum. In parallel, self-completion questionnaires containing the same LOC questions were completed by their partners during pregnancy, at 6 and 20 years later. ALSPAC LOC data are unique in that they measured orientation over time and on a much larger sample of respondents than is usual. We describe the scale used, why it was chosen and how individual scores changed over time.
控制点(LOC)衡量个体对于自身行为能否影响所发生事情的预期。具有内控点(ILOC)的人认为自己的行为会影响所发生在自己身上的事情。具有外控点(ELOC)的人则认为所发生在自己身上的事情超出了他们的控制范围(即由运气、命运、机遇或有权势的他人决定)[1]。大量研究(主要是横断面研究)表明,外控点与许多不良的个人、社会、学业和健康结果相关。控制点数据是从参与雅芳亲子纵向研究(ALSPAC)的12000多名孕妇及其伴侣中独特收集的。所使用的控制点测量方法是成人版诺维基-斯特里克兰内外控制点量表的简化版。该量表在三个时间点通过自我填写问卷的方式施测于母亲:孕期、产后6年和18年。同时,包含相同控制点问题的自我填写问卷由其伴侣在孕期、产后6年以及20年后填写。ALSPAC的控制点数据具有独特性,因为它们测量了随时间变化的取向,并且样本量比通常情况大得多。我们描述了所使用的量表、选择它的原因以及个体得分随时间的变化情况。