• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[中国五大粮食主产区耕地土壤重金属污染的时空趋势及污染源分析]

[Spatial-Temporal Trends and Pollution Source Analysis for Heavy Metal Contamination of Cultivated Soils in Five Major Grain Producing Regions of China].

作者信息

Shang Er-Ping, Xu Er-Qi, Zhang Hong-Qi, Huang Cai-Hong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Oct 8;39(10):4670-4683. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201802139.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201802139
PMID:30229616
Abstract

Heavy metal pollution of farmland soils in China has been identified as a threat to ecosystem safety and human health. A total of 3006 soil samples were analyzed from arable lands in five grain producing regions of China, which included data from published studies from 2000 up to now. An additional 656 historical samples were derived from the 1980s by a digitizing grained point sites map (Cd, Pb, As, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cr, and Hg) from the PRC Atlas of Soil Environmental Background Values. A GIS-based approach and single factor index method were employed to identify the current status and spatial distribution of heavy metal (Cd, Pb, As, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cr, and Hg) contamination in agricultural soils, and these were then compared with historical data to explore contamination trends over time. Then, based on the I method and the effects of the surrounding environment on contamination rates, pollution sources were analyzed. Results showed that 21.49% of the agricultural soil samples exceeded the environmental quality standard set by the Ministry of Environmental Protection. The proportions of slight, moderate, and severe pollution were 13.97%, 2.50%, and 5.02%, respectively. Pollution is more extensive in the south compared with the north. Exceedance percentages in the Sichuan Basin (SC), Yangtze River Middle Plain and Jianghuai Plain (CJ), Huang-Huai-Hai Plain (HHH), Songnen Plain (SN), and Sanjiang Plain (SJ), were 43.55%, 30.64%, 12.22%, 9.35%, and 1.67%, respectively. The main pollutants were Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Hg, with exceedance percentages of 17.39%, 8.41%, 4.04%, 2.84%, and 2.56%, respectively. Since the 1980s, heavy metal pollution has increased by 14.91%. The proportion of Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Hg increased by 16.07%, 4.56%, 3.68%, 2.24%, and 1.96%, respectively. Except for SJ, exceedance percentages in cultivated land increased significantly, while the exceedance percentages of Cd, Ni, and Cu in the southern areas were higher than for the northern areas-although the growth rate of Hg and Cr in the south was lower than that in the north. The main sources of Cd and Hg were anthropogenic pollution, while the other six heavy metals were from predominantly natural sources. However, about 20.00% of Pb, Zn, and Cu were affected by anthropogenic activities. Mining, industry, and sewage water were the main sources of pollution. In addition to the larger impact of sewage irrigation in the north, other sources of pollution showed greater influence in the south. Mining mainly caused pollution by Cd, Hg, Ni, Cr, and Cu, while excessive levels of Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Hg was the signature of industrial pollution. Irrigation with sewage effluent causes excessive Cd, Ni, and Zn. Results from this study provide valuable information for agricultural soil management and food safety in China.

摘要

中国农田土壤的重金属污染已被确认为对生态系统安全和人类健康的一种威胁。共对中国五个粮食产区的耕地土壤进行了3006个样本分析,其中包括2000年至今已发表研究的数据。另外656个历史样本来自20世纪80年代,通过对《中华人民共和国土壤环境背景值图集》中的数字化点位地图(镉、铅、砷、镍、铜、锌、铬和汞)进行处理获得。采用基于地理信息系统(GIS)的方法和单因子指数法来确定农业土壤中重金属(镉、铅、砷、镍、铜、锌、铬和汞)污染的现状和空间分布,然后将其与历史数据进行比较,以探究污染随时间的变化趋势。接着,基于内梅罗(I)方法以及周边环境对污染率的影响,对污染源进行了分析。结果表明,21.49%的农业土壤样本超过了环境保护部设定的环境质量标准。轻度、中度和重度污染的比例分别为13.97%、2.50%和5.02%。与北方相比,南方的污染更为广泛。四川盆地(SC)、长江中下游平原和江淮平原(CJ)、黄淮海平原(HHH)、松嫩平原(SN)和三江平原(SJ)的超标率分别为43.55%、30.64%、12.22%、9.35%和1.67%。主要污染物为镉、镍、铜、锌和汞,超标率分别为17.39%、8.41%、4.04%、2.84%和2.56%。自20世纪80年代以来,重金属污染增加了14.91%。镉、镍、铜、锌和汞的比例分别增加了16.07%、4.56%、3.68%、2.24%和1.96%。除三江平原外,耕地的超标率显著增加,且南方地区镉、镍和铜的超标率高于北方地区,尽管南方汞和铬的增长率低于北方。镉和汞的主要来源是人为污染,而其他六种重金属主要来自自然源。然而,约20.00%的铅、锌和铜受到人为活动的影响。采矿、工业和污水是主要污染源。除北方污水灌溉影响较大外,其他污染源在南方的影响更大。采矿主要导致镉、汞、镍、铬和铜污染,而工业污染的特征是镉、镍、铜、锌和汞超标。污水灌溉导致镉、镍和锌超标。本研究结果为中国农业土壤管理和食品安全提供了有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
[Spatial-Temporal Trends and Pollution Source Analysis for Heavy Metal Contamination of Cultivated Soils in Five Major Grain Producing Regions of China].[中国五大粮食主产区耕地土壤重金属污染的时空趋势及污染源分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Oct 8;39(10):4670-4683. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201802139.
2
Risk Assessment and Source Identification of Toxic Metals in the Agricultural Soil around a Pb/Zn Mining and Smelting Area in Southwest China.中国西南某铅锌矿采冶区周边农田土壤中有毒金属的风险评估与来源识别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 25;15(9):1838. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091838.
3
[Spatial Variation of Heavy Metals in Soils and Its Ecological Risk Evaluation in a Typical Production Area].[典型产区土壤重金属空间变异及其生态风险评价]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Jun 8;39(6):2893-2903. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201707115.
4
Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China.中国东北辽宁省钢铁工业城市(鞍山)城市土壤中重金属污染及人体健康风险评估
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Oct;120:377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
[Characteristics and Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Soils of Industrial Regions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt].[长江经济带工业区域土壤重金属污染特征与评价]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Apr 8;43(4):2062-2070. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202106237.
6
[Characteristics of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Bibliometric Analysis].基于文献计量分析的长江经济带农田土壤重金属污染特征
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Nov 8;43(11):5169-5179. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202112303.
7
Heavy Metal Pollution and Source Contributions in Agricultural Soils Developed from Karst Landform in the Southwestern Region of China.中国西南地区喀斯特地貌发育的农业土壤中的重金属污染及来源贡献
Toxics. 2022 Sep 27;10(10):568. doi: 10.3390/toxics10100568.
8
[Heavy metal pollution characteristics and ecological risk analysis for soil in Phyllostachys praecox stands of Lin'an].临安雷竹林土壤重金属污染特征及生态风险分析
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jun;26(6):1883-91.
9
[Spatial Distribution, Contamination Assessment, and Sources of Heavy Metals in the Urban Green Space Soils of a City in North China].[中国北方某城市城市绿地土壤中重金属的空间分布、污染评估及来源]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Dec 8;41(12):5552-5561. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202004277.
10
[Evaluation of Heavy Metal Distribution Characteristics and Ecological Risk of Soil of Vegetable Land for Hong Kong in Ningxia].宁夏香港蔬菜地土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jun 8;45(6):3512-3522. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202307048.

引用本文的文献

1
Spraying Zinc Sulfate to Reveal the Mechanism through the Glutathione Metabolic Pathway Regulates the Cadmium Tolerance of Seashore Paspalum ( Swartz).喷施硫酸锌以揭示通过谷胱甘肽代谢途径调节海滨雀稗(Swartz)对镉耐受性的机制。
Plants (Basel). 2023 May 15;12(10):1982. doi: 10.3390/plants12101982.
2
Heavy Metal Contamination Alters the Co-Decomposition of Leaves of the Invasive Tree L. and the Native Tree Laxm.重金属污染改变了入侵树种L.与本土树种Laxm.叶片的共分解作用。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;12(13):2523. doi: 10.3390/plants12132523.
3
Soil applied silicon and manganese combined with foliar application of 5-aminolevulinic acid mediate photosynthetic recovery in Cd-stressed by regulating Cd-transporter genes.
土壤施用硅和锰并结合叶面喷施5-氨基乙酰丙酸,通过调控镉转运基因来介导镉胁迫下的光合恢复。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 29;13:1011872. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1011872. eCollection 2022.
4
Distribution, Genesis, and Human Health Risks of Groundwater Heavy Metals Impacted by the Typical Setting of Songnen Plain of NE China.受中国东北松嫩平原典型布局影响的地下水重金属的分布、成因及对人类健康的风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063571.