1 Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
2 HammondCare, Greenwich, NSW, Australia.
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1575-1583. doi: 10.1177/0269216318800613. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
In rural settings, relationships between place and self are often stronger than for urban residents, so one may expect that rural people would view dying at home as a major feature of the 'good death'.
To explore the concept of the 'good death' articulated by rural patients with life-limiting illnesses, and their family caregivers.
Ethnography, utilising open-ended interviews, observations and field-notes.
In total, 12 rural (town and farm) patients with life-limiting illnesses, 18 family caregivers and 6 clinicians, in the Snowy Monaro region of New South Wales, Australia, participated in this study over the course of the deaths of the patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed with observational data using an emergent thematic process.
A 'safe death' was central to a 'good death' and was described as a death in which one could maintain (1) a connection with one's previous identity; (2) autonomy and control over decisions regarding management of end-of-life care and (3) not being overwhelmed by the physical management of the dying process. For all participants, the preferred place of death was the 'safe place', regardless of its physical location.
Safety, in this study, is related to a familiar place for death. A home death is not essential for and does not ensure a 'good death'. We all have a responsibility to ensure all places for dying can deliver the 'safe death'. Future research could explore the inter-relationships between safety and preference for home or home-like places of death.
在农村地区,人与地方的关系往往比城市居民更为紧密,因此人们可能会期望农村人将在家中去世视为“善终”的一个重要特征。
探讨生命有限的农村患者及其家属所表达的“善终”概念。
民族志研究,采用开放式访谈、观察和现场记录。
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州斯诺伊·莫拉罗地区,共有 12 名生命有限的农村(城镇和农场)患者、18 名家属照顾者和 6 名临床医生参与了这项研究,研究过程中患者去世。访谈记录和观察数据使用新兴主题过程进行转录和分析。
“安全死亡”是“善终”的核心,被描述为一个人可以保持(1)与以前身份的联系;(2)对临终关怀管理决策的自主权和控制权;(3)不被死亡过程的身体管理所压垮。对所有参与者来说,无论其物理位置如何,首选的死亡地点都是“安全之地”。
在本研究中,安全与死亡的熟悉地点有关。在家中去世对于实现“善终”并非必要条件,也不能确保其实现。我们都有责任确保所有的临终场所都能提供“安全死亡”。未来的研究可以探讨安全与在家或类似家庭环境中去世的偏好之间的相互关系。