Xu Richard Huan, Cheung Annie Wai-Ling, Wong Eliza Lai-Yi
The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China,
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 4;12:1667-1675. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S171026. eCollection 2018.
The objective of this study was to develop, pilot test, and psychometrically validate a patient engagement questionnaire, called Patient Engagement Index (PEI), in Hong Kong, China.
The method employed was based on a patient engagement framework and literature review and expert panel discussion. A new measure named PEI with 20 items divided into five factors was developed. A pilot study of 40 patients was used to confirm the clarity of PEI. Explored factor analysis was used to confirm the construct validity. Cronbach's alpha, intercorrelation coefficients (ICCs), and weighted kappa were used to assess the internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability separately. Rasch model and differential item functioning were also used to further confirm the fit of the instrument.
In all, 324 participants successfully completed the survey. Based on the evaluation of exploratory factor analysis and theoretically considerations, a four-factor structure comprising 20 items was identified. Rasch analysis also confirmed that the model has a good fit (ranging from 0.662 to 1.294). All domains were considered internally consistent (alpha >0.7). Test-retest showed both ICC (>0.6) and weighted kappa (>0.4) meeting the minimum recommended standard. No ceiling or floor effect was found. Furthermore, Spearman's correlation coefficient confirmed that PEI had good internal validity.
PEI was shown to have good reliability and validity. This is a short, quick, and appropriate tool to assess the extent of patient engagement in both clinical and research settings.
本研究的目的是在中国香港地区开发、进行预试验并对一份名为患者参与度问卷(Patient Engagement Index,PEI)的问卷进行心理测量学验证。
所采用的方法基于患者参与度框架、文献综述和专家小组讨论。开发了一种名为PEI的新测量工具,包含20个项目,分为五个因子。对40名患者进行了预试验以确认PEI的清晰度。采用探索性因子分析来确认结构效度。分别使用克朗巴哈系数、组内相关系数(ICCs)和加权kappa系数来评估内部一致性信度和重测信度。还使用了拉施模型和项目功能差异分析来进一步确认该工具的拟合度。
共有324名参与者成功完成了调查。基于探索性因子分析的评估和理论考虑,确定了一个由20个项目组成的四因子结构。拉施分析也证实该模型具有良好的拟合度(范围从0.662到1.294)。所有领域都被认为具有内部一致性(α>0.7)。重测显示组内相关系数(>0.6)和加权kappa系数(>0.4)均符合最低推荐标准。未发现天花板效应或地板效应。此外,斯皮尔曼相关系数证实PEI具有良好的内部效度。
PEI显示出具有良好的信度和效度。这是一个简短、快速且合适的工具,可用于评估患者在临床和研究环境中的参与程度。