Castro Eva Marie, Van Regenmortel Tine, Vanhaecht Kris, Sermeus Walter, Van Hecke Ann
Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Faculty of Social Sciences - HIVA, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Belgium; Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
The concepts of patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness have been introduced as part of the trend towards a more participatory health care and have largely been used interchangeably. Although these concepts have been discussed for a number of years, their exact meaning in hospital care remains somewhat unclear. This absence of theoretical and conceptual clarity has led to (1) poor understanding and communication among researchers, health practitioners and policy makers and (2) problems in measurement and comparison between studies across different hospitals.
This paper examines all three concepts through a concept analysis based on the method of Avant and Walker (2005) [1] and the simultaneous concept analysis of Haase et al. (1992) [2].
Through these methods, the antecedents, attributes, consequences and empirical referents of each concept are determined. In addition, similarities and differences between the three concepts are identified and a definition offered for each concept. Furthermore, the interrelatedness between the key concepts is mapped, and definitions are proposed.
It can be concluded that patient empowerment is a much broader concept than just patient participation and patient-centeredness.
The present study may provide a useful framework that researchers, policy makers and health care providers can use to facilitate patient empowerment.
患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心的概念已作为更具参与性的医疗保健趋势的一部分被引入,并且在很大程度上被交替使用。尽管这些概念已经讨论了多年,但它们在医院护理中的确切含义仍有些不明确。这种理论和概念上的不清晰导致了:(1)研究人员、医疗从业者和政策制定者之间的理解和沟通不畅;(2)不同医院研究之间在测量和比较方面存在问题。
本文通过基于阿万特和沃克(2005年)[1]的方法以及哈泽等人(1992年)[2]的同步概念分析对这三个概念进行考察。
通过这些方法,确定了每个概念的前因、属性、后果和实证参照。此外,还确定了这三个概念之间的异同,并为每个概念提供了定义。此外,还绘制了关键概念之间的相互关系,并提出了定义。
可以得出结论,患者赋权是一个比患者参与和以患者为中心更广泛的概念。
本研究可能提供一个有用的框架,研究人员、政策制定者和医疗保健提供者可以利用该框架促进患者赋权。