Blubaugh Carmen K, Carpenter-Boggs Lynne, Reganold John P, Schaeffer Robert N, Snyder William E
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 3;9:1239. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01239. eCollection 2018.
Herbivore suppression is mediated by both plant defenses and predators. In turn, plant defenses are impacted by soil fertility and interactions with soil bacteria. Measuring the relative importance of nutritional and microbial drivers of herbivore resistance has proven problematic, in part because it is difficult to manipulate soil-bacterial community composition. Here, we exploit variation in soil fertility and microbial biodiversity across 20 farms to untangle suppression of aphids () through bottom-up and top-down channels. We planted plants in soil from each farm, manipulated single and dual infestations of aphids alone or with caterpillars (), and exposed aphids to parasitoid wasps () in the open field. We then used multi-model inference to identify the strongest soil-based predictors of herbivore growth and parasitism. We found that densities of spp., a genus known to include plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria, negatively correlated with aphid suppression by specialist parasitoids. Aphid parasitism also was disrupted on plants that had caterpillar damage, compared to plants attacked only by aphids. Relative abundance of spp. bacteria correlated with higher aphid growth, although this appeared to be a direct effect, as aphid parasitism was not associated with this group of bacteria. Non-pathogenic soil bacteria are often shown to deliver benefits to plants, improving plant nutrition and the deployment of anti-herbivore defenses. However, our results suggest that these plant growth-promoting bacteria may also indirectly weaken top-down aphid suppression by parasitoids and directly improve aphid performance. Against a background of varying soil fertility, microbial biodiversity, competing herbivores, and natural enemies, we found that effects of non-pathogenic soil microbes on aphid growth outweighed those of nutritional factors. Therefore, predictions about the strength of plant defenses along resource gradients must be expanded to include microbial associates.
食草动物的抑制作用由植物防御和捕食者共同介导。反过来,植物防御又受到土壤肥力以及与土壤细菌相互作用的影响。事实证明,衡量食草动物抗性的营养驱动因素和微生物驱动因素的相对重要性存在问题,部分原因是难以操纵土壤细菌群落组成。在这里,我们利用20个农场土壤肥力和微生物生物多样性的差异,通过自下而上和自上而下的渠道来理清对蚜虫()的抑制作用。我们在每个农场的土壤中种植植物,单独或与毛虫()一起操纵蚜虫的单次和双重侵染,并在露天环境中将蚜虫暴露于寄生蜂()。然后,我们使用多模型推断来确定基于土壤的食草动物生长和寄生作用的最强预测因子。我们发现,已知包含促进植物生长的根际细菌的 属细菌的密度与专性寄生蜂对蚜虫的抑制作用呈负相关。与仅受到蚜虫攻击的植物相比,受到毛虫损害的植物上的蚜虫寄生作用也受到了干扰。 属细菌的相对丰度与蚜虫的较高生长相关,尽管这似乎是直接效应,因为蚜虫的寄生作用与这组细菌无关。非致病性土壤细菌通常被证明能给植物带来益处,改善植物营养并增强抗食草动物防御。然而,我们的结果表明,这些促进植物生长的细菌也可能间接削弱寄生蜂对蚜虫的自上而下的抑制作用,并直接提高蚜虫的生存能力。在土壤肥力、微生物生物多样性、竞争性食草动物和天敌各不相同的背景下,我们发现非致病性土壤微生物对蚜虫生长的影响超过了营养因素。因此,关于沿资源梯度的植物防御强度的预测必须扩展到包括微生物共生体。