Suppr超能文献

Fire Safety in Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

作者信息

Li Janet Y, Kampp Jeremy T

机构信息

*Both authors are affiliated with the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Both authors are affiliated with the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):390-397. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001681.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical fire is a rare event, but one with potentially devastating patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of surgical fires experienced by members of the American College of Mohs Surgeons (ACMS).

METHODS

An internet survey was developed and sent to ACMS members. Data collected included total years of experience, total number of cases, typical management of supplemental oxygen, and surgical fires experienced.

RESULTS

Eighty participants contributed data on 886,200 cases of MMS. Nine surgeons (11%) reported at least 1 surgical fire, yielding an estimated incidence of 1 fire per 88,620 cases (0.001%). The most common site of involvement was the scalp (67%). Common ignition sources included monopolar electrosurgical devices (78%) and battery-powered thermal cautery (22%). Fuel sources included towels or drapes, gauze, isopropyl alcohol, aluminum chloride, hairspray, and diethyl ether. Supplemental oxygen was not involved in any of the cases. Five patients suffered singed hair while 4 patients did not suffer any injuries. None suffered any permanent functional or aesthetic deformities.

CONCLUSION

The overall risk of surgical fire in MMS is minimal. However, safety measures and greater awareness of fire risks are necessary to prevent patient harm.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验