Al-Jaroudi Dania, Salim Gamar, Baradwan Saeed
Reproductive Endocrine and Infertility Medicine Department Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012310.
We retrospectively compared neonatal sex after antagonist- versus long-stimulation protocols followed by fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) or fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with either protocol. We reviewed data for 762 IVF/ICSI cycles in 2015, including 23 IVF procedures. We summarized sex outcomes in the entire cohort, and for the additional subgroups: embryo transfer day and number of embryos transferred, and number of oocytes recovered and maternal age. Among 169 live births for all protocols combined, 50.9% of babies were male, and we saw no difference between the antagonist versus long-stimulation groups (52.3% vs 48.3% male babies, respectively; P = .740). Our results also showed no significant difference in sex proportion when comparing IVF versus ICSI, although a higher proportion of babies were male with the antagonist-ICSI protocol. Differences between the additional subgroups were also neither clinically nor statistically significant.
我们回顾性比较了拮抗剂方案与长效刺激方案后行新鲜体外受精(IVF)或新鲜卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)任一方案后的新生儿性别。我们回顾了2015年762个IVF/ICSI周期的数据,包括23例IVF手术。我们总结了整个队列以及其他亚组的性别结果:胚胎移植日和移植胚胎数,回收卵母细胞数和产妇年龄。在所有方案合并的169例活产中,50.9%的婴儿为男性,拮抗剂组与长效刺激组之间无差异(分别为52.3%和48.3%的男婴;P = 0.740)。我们的结果还显示,比较IVF与ICSI时,性别比例无显著差异,尽管拮抗剂-ICSI方案的男婴比例更高。其他亚组之间的差异在临床和统计学上均无显著意义。