Turpin Rodman E, Slopen Natalie, Chen Shuo, Boekeloo Bradley, Dallal Cher, Dyer Typhanye
a Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , School of Public HealthUniversity of Maryland , College Park , MD , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology and Public Health , School of Medicine, University of Maryland , Baltimore , MD , USA.
AIDS Care. 2019 Feb;31(2):216-223. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1524117. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Syndemic methodology has been employed in several studies of HIV-related outcomes affecting Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) and rarely in Black heterosexual men. In contrast to the most common method for assessing syndemics, the use of a syndemic component index, latent class analysis can identify unique combinations of risk factors that may form a syndemic. Analyzing a primarily heterosexual sample of 1,786 Black men from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we used a 4 latent class model based on depression diagnosis, poverty, and healthcare access to predict ever having been HIV tested. Class 1 was characterized by low proportions of all the risk factors. Class 2 had relatively high healthcare barriers, being the most likely to not have a personal doctor (.8175) and the most likely to have no routine checkup in the past year (.6327) but had relatively low depression diagnosis and poverty. Class 3 had relatively high poverty (.8853), but generally low barriers to healthcare access. Class 4 was characterized by high proportions of all the risk factors. Using log-binomial regression models, there was a significantly lower prevalence of ever having been HIV tested among class 3 (PR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.49, 0.98) and class 4 (PR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.28, 0.84) compared to class 1. When adjusting for education, age, and marital status, the associations were attenuated but still significant for class 3 (aPR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52, 0.96) and class 4 (aPR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78). Latent class analysis may better serve syndemic research aims in understanding HIV-related outcomes among high-risk populations. Future research using this method to evaluate HIV testing outcomes among BMSM is recommended.
共病方法已被用于多项关于影响男男性行为黑人(BMSM)的艾滋病毒相关结果的研究中,而在黑人异性恋男性中很少使用。与评估共病的最常用方法(即使用共病成分指数)不同,潜在类别分析可以识别可能构成共病的风险因素的独特组合。我们分析了来自2015年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的1786名黑人男性的主要异性恋样本,使用基于抑郁症诊断、贫困和医疗保健可及性的4类潜在类别模型来预测是否曾接受过艾滋病毒检测。第1类的特征是所有风险因素的比例都很低。第2类有相对较高的医疗保健障碍,最有可能没有私人医生(0.8175),并且在过去一年中最有可能没有进行常规体检(0.6327),但抑郁症诊断和贫困程度相对较低。第3类有相对较高的贫困率(0.8853),但医疗保健可及性的障碍总体较低。第4类的特征是所有风险因素的比例都很高。使用对数二项回归模型,与第1类相比,第3类(PR = 0.69,95% CI 0.49,0.98)和第4类(PR = 0.49,95% CI 0.28,0.84)中曾接受过艾滋病毒检测的患病率显著较低。在调整教育程度、年龄和婚姻状况后,第3类(aPR = 0.71,95% CI 0.52,0.96)和第4类(aPR = 0.60,95% CI 0.46,0.78)的关联减弱但仍然显著。潜在类别分析可能更有助于实现共病研究目标,以了解高危人群中与艾滋病毒相关的结果。建议未来使用这种方法评估男男性行为黑人中的艾滋病毒检测结果。