Biocapteurs Analyse Environment, University of Perpignan via Domitia, Perpignan, France; AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, Agroécologie, France; Centre de Recherches Insulaires et Observatoire de l'Environnement, USR 3278 EPHE-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Perpignan via Domitia, Perpignan, France.
AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, Agroécologie, France.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.159. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
The emergence of pesticides of natural origin appears as an environmental-friendly alternative to synthetic pesticides for managing weeds. To verify this assumption, leptospermone, a natural β-triketone herbicide, and sulcotrione, a synthetic one, were applied to soil microcosms at 0× (control), 1× or 10× recommended field dose. The fate of these two herbicides (i.e. dissipation and formation of transformation products) was monitored to assess the scenario of exposure of soil microorganisms to natural and synthetic herbicides. Ecotoxicological impact of both herbicides was explored by monitoring soil bacterial diversity and activity using next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and soil metabolomics. Both leptospermone and sulcotrione fully dissipated over the incubation period. During their dissipation, transformation products of natural and synthetic β-triketone were detected. Hydroxy-leptospermone was almost completely dissipated by the end of the experiment, while CMBA, the major metabolite of sulcotrione, remained in soil microcosms. After 8 days of exposure, the diversity and structure of the soil bacterial community treated with leptospermone was significantly modified, while less significant changes were observed for sulcotrione. For both herbicides, the diversity of the soil bacterial community was still not completely recovered by the end of the experiment (45 days). The combined use of next-generation sequencing and metabolomic approaches allowed us to assess the ecotoxicological impact of natural and synthetic pesticides on non-target soil microorganisms and to detect potential biomarkers of soil exposure to β-triketones.
天然源农药的出现为管理杂草提供了一种比合成农药更环保的替代选择。为了验证这一假设,我们将天然β-三酮除草剂旱草酮和合成除草剂磺草酮应用于土壤微宇宙中,剂量分别为推荐田间剂量的 0×(对照)、1×或 10×。监测这两种除草剂(即消解和转化产物的形成)的命运,以评估土壤微生物暴露于天然和合成除草剂的情况。通过监测土壤细菌多样性和活性,利用 16S rRNA 基因扩增子和土壤代谢组学的下一代测序来探索这两种除草剂的生态毒性影响。旱草酮和磺草酮在整个培养期内完全消解。在它们消解的过程中,检测到了天然和合成β-三酮的转化产物。羟基旱草酮在实验结束时几乎完全消解,而磺草酮的主要代谢物 CMBA 仍留在土壤微宇宙中。暴露 8 天后,用旱草酮处理的土壤细菌群落的多样性和结构发生了显著改变,而磺草酮的变化则不那么明显。对于这两种除草剂,到实验结束时(45 天),土壤细菌群落的多样性仍未完全恢复。结合使用下一代测序和代谢组学方法,我们能够评估天然和合成农药对非靶标土壤微生物的生态毒性影响,并检测到β-三酮暴露土壤的潜在生物标志物。