Suppr超能文献

欧洲患者参与药物研发指南:卫生技术评估

EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment.

作者信息

Hunter Amy, Facey Karen, Thomas Victoria, Haerry David, Warner Kay, Klingmann Ingrid, May Matthew, See Wolf

机构信息

European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI).

Genetic Alliance UK, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 6;5:231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00231. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The main aim of health technology assessment (HTA) is to inform decision making by health care policy makers. It is a systematic process that evaluates the use of health technologies and generally involves a critical review of international evidence related to clinical effectiveness of the health technology vs. the best standard of care. It can also include an evaluation of cost effectiveness, and social and ethical impacts in the local health care system. The HTA process advises whether or not a health technology should be used, and if so, how it is best used and which patients are most likely to benefit from it. The importance of patient involvement in HTA is becoming widely recognized, for scientific and democratic reasons. The extent of patient involvement in HTA varies considerably across Europe. Commonly HTA is still focused on quantitative evidence to determine clinical and/or cost effectiveness, but the interest in understanding patients' experiences and preferences is increasing. Some HTA bodies provide support for participation in their processes, but again this varies widely across Europe. The involvement of patients in HTA is determined at the national and regional level, and is not subject to any European-wide legislation. The guidance text presented in this article was developed as part of the work of the European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) and covers the interaction between HTA bodies and patients and their representatives when medicines are being assessed. Other EUPATI guidance documents relate to patient involvement in pharmaceutical industry-led research and development, ethics committees, and regulatory authorities. The guidance provides recommendations for activities to support patient involvement in HTA bodies and specific guidance for individual HTA processes. It seeks to improve patient involvement, using the outcomes of published research and consensus-building exercises. It also draws on good practice examples from individual HTA bodies. The guidance is not intended to be prescriptive and should be used according to specific circumstances, national legislation, or the unique needs of each interaction. This article represents the formal publication of the HTA guidance text with discussion about recent progress in, and continuing barriers to, patient involvement in HTA.

摘要

卫生技术评估(HTA)的主要目的是为医疗保健政策制定者的决策提供依据。它是一个系统的过程,用于评估卫生技术的使用情况,通常包括对与该卫生技术相对于最佳护理标准的临床有效性相关的国际证据进行批判性审查。它还可以包括对成本效益以及当地医疗保健系统中的社会和伦理影响的评估。HTA过程会就一种卫生技术是否应该被使用提供建议,如果应该使用,那么如何最好地使用它以及哪些患者最有可能从中受益。出于科学和民主的原因,患者参与HTA的重要性正得到广泛认可。在欧洲,患者参与HTA的程度差异很大。通常,HTA仍侧重于定量证据以确定临床和/或成本效益,但对了解患者体验和偏好的兴趣正在增加。一些HTA机构为参与其流程提供支持,但同样,这在欧洲各地差异很大。患者参与HTA是由国家和地区层面决定的,不受任何全欧洲范围立法的约束。本文所呈现的指导文本是作为欧洲治疗创新患者学院(EUPATI)工作的一部分而制定的,涵盖了在评估药品时HTA机构与患者及其代表之间的互动。EUPATI的其他指导文件涉及患者参与制药行业主导的研发、伦理委员会和监管机构。该指导为支持患者参与HTA机构的活动提供建议,并为个别HTA流程提供具体指导。它试图利用已发表研究的成果和建立共识的活动来改善患者参与。它还借鉴了个别HTA机构的良好实践范例。该指导并非旨在具有规定性,应根据具体情况、国家立法或每次互动的独特需求来使用。本文代表了HTA指导文本的正式发布,并讨论了患者参与HTA的最新进展和持续存在的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8836/6136274/199d94830161/fmed-05-00231-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 6;5:231. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00231. eCollection 2018.
3
EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Ethical Review of Clinical Trials.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 7;5:251. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00251. eCollection 2018.
4
EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Processes.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 17;5:230. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00230. eCollection 2018.
5
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
6
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
The Role of EUPATI CH in Promoting Patient Involvement in Clinical Research: A Multi-Stakeholder Research Project.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 23;8:795659. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.795659. eCollection 2021.
8
Patient advocacy group involvement in health technology assessments: an observational study.
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 25;7(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00327-5.
9
Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.
10
Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011050.

引用本文的文献

2
Learning strategies for laypeople to participate in health technology assessment: a scoping review.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Apr 14;41(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000200.

本文引用的文献

1
EVALUATION OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT INITIATIVES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(6):715-723. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000976. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
WHY PATIENTS SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000241. Epub 2017 May 22.
3
PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):256-264. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000362. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
4
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jul;26(3):334-40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000395.
5
"It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1518-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验