• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定开放性胫骨骨折软组织重建的时间预测因素。

Identifying Predictors of Time to Soft-Tissue Reconstruction following Open Tibia Fractures.

机构信息

From Duke University School of Medicine; the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Duke University Medical Center; and the Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1620-1628. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005007.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005007
PMID:30239497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the optimal timing of soft-tissue coverage following severe lower extremity trauma. This study identifies nationwide practice patterns and factors associated with discrepancies in time to first flap surgery following open tibia fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the National Trauma Databank from 2008 to 2015 to identify patients who presented with an open tibia fracture and underwent subsequent flap reconstruction. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was performed, revealing those factors most significantly associated with differences in time to flap surgery from hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 3297 patients were included in the analysis. Mean ± SD and median times to first flap surgery were 230.1 ± 246.7 hours and 169.1 hours, respectively. Older age, nonwhite race, treatment in the South, and non-private insurance status were all independently associated with an increased time to flap surgery. In addition, more surgical débridements; a higher Injury Severity Score and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale score; and a nerve, vascular, and/or crush injury were independent predictors of an increased time to flap surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who present with open tibia fractures requiring soft-tissue coverage undergo flap reconstruction after the historical 72-hour window. Specific sociodemographic and clinical factors were independently predictive of an increased time to flap surgery. These findings suggest that not all patients in the United States are receiving the same level of care in lower extremity trauma reconstruction, emphasizing the need to develop more explicit national standards.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

摘要

背景

严重下肢创伤后软组织覆盖的最佳时机仍存在争议。本研究确定了全国范围内的实践模式以及与开放性胫骨骨折后首次皮瓣手术时间差异相关的因素。

方法

对 2008 年至 2015 年国家创伤数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定有开放性胫骨骨折并随后行皮瓣重建的患者。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子算法,揭示与皮瓣手术时间差异最显著相关的因素。

结果

共纳入 3297 例患者。首次皮瓣手术的平均±标准差和中位数时间分别为 230.1±246.7 小时和 169.1 小时。年龄较大、非白种人、南部治疗和非私人保险状态均与皮瓣手术时间延长独立相关。此外,更多的手术清创术;更高的损伤严重程度评分和/或简明损伤评分;以及神经、血管和/或挤压伤是皮瓣手术时间延长的独立预测因素。

结论

大多数有开放性胫骨骨折需要软组织覆盖的患者在历史上的 72 小时窗口后接受皮瓣重建。特定的社会人口和临床因素是皮瓣手术时间延长的独立预测因素。这些发现表明,美国并非所有患者在下肢创伤重建中都接受相同水平的治疗,强调需要制定更明确的国家标准。

临床问题/证据水平:风险,III 级。

相似文献

1
Identifying Predictors of Time to Soft-Tissue Reconstruction following Open Tibia Fractures.确定开放性胫骨骨折软组织重建的时间预测因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1620-1628. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005007.
2
Short-term wound complications after application of flaps for coverage of traumatic soft-tissue defects about the tibia. The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group.应用皮瓣覆盖胫骨周围创伤性软组织缺损后的短期伤口并发症。下肢评估项目(LEAP)研究小组。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Dec;82(12):1681-91.
3
Acute unreamed intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with muscle flaps for the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures.急性非扩髓髓内钉固定联合肌瓣软组织重建治疗严重开放性胫骨干骨折
Injury. 2007 Aug;38(8):906-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.052. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
4
Lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction and amputation rates in patients with open tibial fractures in Sweden during 1998-2010.1998年至2010年期间瑞典开放性胫骨骨折患者的下肢软组织重建及截肢率
BMC Surg. 2014 Oct 16;14:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-80.
5
One-stage treatment and reconstruction of Gustilo Type III open tibial shaft fractures with a vascularized fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap graft.带血管蒂腓骨骨皮瓣移植一期治疗和重建 Gustilo Ⅲ型开放性胫骨骨干骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Dec;24(12):745-51. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d88a07.
6
The Effect of Free versus Local Flaps on Time to Union in Open Tibia Fractures.游离皮瓣与局部皮瓣对开放性胫骨骨折愈合时间的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 1;151(3):655-663. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009934. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
[Muscle flap transfer of the treatment of infected tibial and malleolar fractures and chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia].[肌肉瓣转移治疗感染性胫腓骨骨折及胫骨慢性骨髓炎]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Jun;74(3):162-70.
8
The Continued Impact of Godina's Principles: Outcomes of Flap Coverage as a Function of Time After Definitive Fixation of Open Lower Extremity Fractures.戈迪纳原则的持续影响:下肢开放性骨折确定性固定后不同时间皮瓣覆盖的结果。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 Oct;40(8):648-656. doi: 10.1055/a-2273-4075. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
9
The management of open tibial fractures in children: a retrospective case series of eight years' experience of 61 cases at a paediatric specialist centre.儿童开放性胫骨骨折的治疗:一家儿科专科中心八年61例病例的回顾性系列研究
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):544-553. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.37855.
10
Open Tibia Shaft Fractures and Soft-Tissue Coverage: The Effects of Management by an Orthopaedic Microsurgical Team.开放性胫骨干骨折与软组织覆盖:骨科显微外科团队治疗的效果
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jun;31(6):339-344. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000815.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Flap Reconstruction and Infection Rates in Open Lower Extremity Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.开放性下肢骨折的早期皮瓣重建与感染率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 6;13(6):e6829. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006829. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Flap coverage within 8 days does not increase fracture-related infection risk: results of a protocol implementation in a developing country.8天内进行皮瓣覆盖不会增加骨折相关感染风险:在一个发展中国家实施方案的结果
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 18;35(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04225-4.
3
Predicting Union, Osteomyelitis, and Amputation Outcomes of Gustilo IIIC Open Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Study.
预测 Gustilo IIIC 型开放性胫骨骨折的愈合、骨髓炎和截肢结局:一项回顾性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jan;16(1):94-103. doi: 10.1111/os.13940. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Comparing outcomes following direct admission and early transfer to specialized trauma centers in open tibial fracture treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性胫骨骨折治疗中直接入院与早期转至专业创伤中心后的疗效比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Apr;50(2):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02366-x. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
5
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy combined with polymethylmethacrylate sealant for wound management of Gustilo type III open tibia fractures.负压伤口治疗联合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯密封剂用于Gustilo III型开放性胫骨骨折伤口处理的临床和影像学结果
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Sep 22;57(6):366-71. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.22104.
6
Does treatment at a level I trauma center reduce disparities in patient outcomes for open tibia fractures? A retrospective analysis of the National trauma Databank.在一级创伤中心进行治疗是否能减少开放性胫骨骨折患者预后的差异?一项对国家创伤数据库的回顾性分析。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jul 4;43:102209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102209. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Correlation of Time to Soft Tissue Coverage With Clinical Outcome in Lower Extremity Trauma in the Modern Era: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.现代下肢创伤软组织覆盖时间与临床结局的相关性:一项单中心回顾性研究
Eplasty. 2022 Nov 30;22:eX. eCollection 2022.
8
Open fractures with soft-tissue loss: Coverage options and timing of surgery.伴有软组织缺损的开放性骨折:覆盖方法及手术时机
OTA Int. 2020 Mar 23;3(1):e053. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000053. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Is Insurance Status Associated with the Likelihood of Operative Treatment of Clavicle Fractures?保险状况是否与锁骨骨折手术治疗的可能性相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2620-2628. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000836.