Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital Hälsovägen 4, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3766-3776. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy554.
We assessed the changes in short- and long-term outcomes and their relation to implementation of new evidence-based treatments in all patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in Sweden over 20 years.
Cases with NSTEMI (n = 205 693) between 1995 and 2014 were included from the nationwide Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry. During 20 years in-hospital invasive procedures increased from 1.9% to 73.2%, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 6.5% to 58.1%, dual antiplatelet medication 0% to 72.7%, statins 13.3% to 85.6%, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blocker 36.8% to 75.5%. The standardized 1-year mortality ratio compared with a control population decreased from 5.53 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.30-5.75] to 3.03 (95% CI 2.89-3.19). If patients admitted the first 2 years were modelled to receive the same invasive treatments as the last 2 years the expected mortality/myocardial infarction (MI) rate would be reduced from 33.0% to 25.0%. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, the change of 1-year cardiovascular death/MI corresponded to a linearly decreasing odds ratio trend of 0.930 (95% CI 0.926-0.935) per 2-year period. This trend was substantially attenuated [0.970 (95% CI 0.964-0.975)] after adjusting for changes in coronary interventions, and almost eliminated [0.988 (95% CI 0.982-0.994)] after also adjusting for changes in discharge medications.
In NSTEMI patients during the last 20 years, there has been a substantial improvement in long-term survival and reduction in the risk of new cardiovascular events. These improvements seem mainly explained by the gradual uptake and widespread use of in-hospital coronary interventions and evidence-based long-term medications.
我们评估了在 20 多年时间里,所有非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的短期和长期结果的变化及其与新的基于证据的治疗方法实施的关系。
我们从全国性的瑞典 Web 系统增强和发展心脏病基于推荐治疗的证据为基础的护理评估(SWEDEHEART)注册中心纳入了 1995 年至 2014 年间的 NSTEMI 病例(n=205693)。在 20 年期间,住院期间的有创性操作从 1.9%增加到 73.2%,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术从 6.5%增加到 58.1%,双联抗血小板药物从 0%增加到 72.7%,他汀类药物从 13.3%增加到 85.6%,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂从 36.8%增加到 75.5%。与对照人群相比,标准化 1 年死亡率比值从 5.53(95%置信区间 5.30-5.75)下降到 3.03(95%置信区间 2.89-3.19)。如果将前 2 年入院的患者建模为接受与后 2 年相同的有创治疗,预期死亡率/心肌梗死(MI)率将从 33.0%下降到 25.0%。在调整了基线特征差异后,1 年心血管死亡/MI 的变化与每 2 年线性下降的比值比趋势呈 0.930(95%置信区间 0.926-0.935)相关。调整冠状动脉介入治疗变化后,该趋势明显减弱[0.970(95%置信区间 0.964-0.975)],调整出院药物变化后几乎消除[0.988(95%置信区间 0.982-0.994)]。
在过去的 20 年中,NSTEMI 患者的长期生存率有了显著提高,新发心血管事件的风险也有所降低。这些改善似乎主要归因于医院内冠状动脉介入治疗和基于证据的长期药物治疗的逐渐采用和广泛应用。