• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家族内比较:基于人群设计与同胞内设计比较胎儿生长受限儿的围生期风险。

Keep it in the family: comparing perinatal risks in small-for-gestational-age infants based on population vs within-sibling designs.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden.

Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):297-306. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy196.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyy196
PMID:30239740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth is commonly used as a proxy for fetal growth restriction, but also includes constitutionally small infants. Genetic factors account for almost half of the risk of SGA birth. We estimated perinatal risks of SGA birth using both population-based and within-sibling analyses, where the latter by design controls for shared genetic factors and maternal environmental factors that are constant across pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a prospective nationwide cohort study of 2 616 974 singleton infants born in Sweden between January 1987 and December 2012, of whom 1 885 924 were full siblings. We estimated associations between severe or moderate SGA (<3rd percentile and 3rd to <10th percentiles, respectively) and risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and morbidity, using both population-based and within-sibling analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in stillbirth analyses, whereas relative risks (RRs) were used for analyses of neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with non-SGA births (>10th percentile), the HR (95% CI) of stillbirth was 18.5 (95% CI 17.4-19.5) among severe SGA births in the population analysis and 22.5 (95% CI 18.7-27.1) in the within-sibling analysis. In non-malformed infants, RRs for neonatal mortality in moderate and severe SGA infants were similarly increased in both population and within-sibling analyses. In term non-malformed infants (≥37 weeks), SGA-related RRs of several neonatal morbidities were higher in within-sibling than in population analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Perinatal risks associated with fetal growth restriction are more accurately estimated from analyses of SGA in which genetic factors are accounted for.

摘要

背景

小胎龄儿(SGA)出生通常被用作胎儿生长受限的替代指标,但也包括先天身材较小的婴儿。遗传因素几乎占 SGA 出生风险的一半。我们使用基于人群的和同胞内分析来估计 SGA 出生的围产期风险,后者通过设计控制了在整个妊娠过程中保持不变的共同遗传因素和母体环境因素。

方法

这是一项在瑞典进行的前瞻性全国队列研究,纳入了 1987 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月间出生的 2616974 例单胎婴儿,其中 1885924 例为同胞。我们使用基于人群的和同胞内分析来估计严重或中度 SGA(分别<第 3 百分位和第 3 至<第 10 百分位)与死产、新生儿死亡率和发病率的风险之间的关联。在死产分析中,使用危害比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来估计,而在新生儿结局分析中,使用相对风险(RR)。

结果

与非 SGA 出生(>第 10 百分位)相比,在人群分析中,严重 SGA 出生的死产 HR(95%CI)为 18.5(95%CI 17.4-19.5),而在同胞内分析中为 22.5(95%CI 18.7-27.1)。在非畸形婴儿中,中度和严重 SGA 婴儿的新生儿死亡率 RR 在人群和同胞内分析中均增加。在足月非畸形婴儿(≥37 周)中,同胞内分析中与 SGA 相关的几种新生儿疾病的 RR 高于人群分析。

结论

从考虑遗传因素的 SGA 分析中,可以更准确地估计与胎儿生长受限相关的围产期风险。

相似文献

1
Keep it in the family: comparing perinatal risks in small-for-gestational-age infants based on population vs within-sibling designs.家族内比较:基于人群设计与同胞内设计比较胎儿生长受限儿的围生期风险。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):297-306. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy196.
2
Small for gestational age and risk of childhood mortality: A Swedish population study.小于胎龄儿与儿童死亡率风险:一项瑞典人群研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002717. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Investigating fetal growth restriction and perinatal risks in appropriate for gestational age infants: using cohort and within-sibling analyses.探讨适于胎龄儿的胎儿生长受限及围生期风险:队列研究和同胞内分析。
BJOG. 2019 Jun;126(7):842-850. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15563. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.INTERGROWTH-21st标准与定制出生体重标准用于围产期死亡率和发病率的识别比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):509.e1-509.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.931. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Fetal and neonatal outcomes of preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation according to antenatal vs postnatal assessments of restricted growth.根据产前与产后对生长受限的评估,孕32周前出生的早产儿的胎儿及新生儿结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):516.e1-516.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
6
Association between fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies.双胎妊娠与单胎妊娠相比,胎儿生长受限与死胎的关系。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):513-520. doi: 10.1002/uog.27661.
7
Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?定制出生体重百分位数:调整孕产妇特征有意义吗?
BJOG. 2008 Oct;115(11):1397-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01870.x.
8
Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.识别适用于早产儿人群的最佳生长图表:一项澳大利亚全州回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002923. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth.胎儿生长受限的产前识别与新生儿发病率和死产风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):621-628. doi: 10.1002/uog.20282. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
Perinatal mortality by gestational week and size at birth in singleton pregnancies at and beyond term: a nationwide population-based cohort study.足月及过期单胎妊娠按孕周和出生体重计算的围产期死亡率:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 22;14:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-172.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of intellectual disability with overall and type-specific cardiovascular diseases: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.智力障碍与总体和特定类型心血管疾病的关联:丹麦一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 6;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02747-4.
2
Birth Weight, Gestational Age, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Early Adulthood: Influence of Familial Factors.出生体重、胎龄与成年早期心血管疾病风险:家族因素的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 2;192(6):866-877. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac223.
3
Systemic hormone therapy and dementia: A nested case-control and co-twin control study.
系统性激素治疗与痴呆:巢式病例对照与同卵双生子对照研究。
Maturitas. 2022 Nov;165:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 May 25.
4
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and the Risks of Overall and Type-Specific Cardiovascular Diseases: A Population- and Sibling-Matched Cohort Study.妊娠糖尿病与总体和特定类型心血管疾病风险:基于人群和同胞匹配队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):151-159. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1018.
5
Maternal hypertensive disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a population-based cohort in two Nordic countries.母亲高血压疾病与后代神经发育障碍:两个北欧国家的基于人群队列研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 May;36(5):519-530. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00756-2. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Neonatal Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants With Severe Congenital Heart Defects: An International Cohort Study.严重先天性心脏缺陷的极早产儿新生儿结局:一项国际队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e015369. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015369. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
Maternal diabetes during pregnancy and early onset of cardiovascular disease in offspring: population based cohort study with 40 years of follow-up.母亲在怀孕期间患糖尿病与后代心血管疾病的早发:一项具有 40 年随访的基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 4;367:l6398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6398.
8
Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Neonates Born With an Isolated Single Umbilical Artery.孤立性单脐动脉的小于胎龄新生儿的围产期结局
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 19;7:79. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00079. eCollection 2019.