• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mobilizing an underused resource: cohort studies for population health intervention research.

作者信息

Edwards Nancy, Plotnikoff Ronald C

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):1730-1733. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy191.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyy191
PMID:30239808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6280924/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Mobilizing an underused resource: cohort studies for population health intervention research.调动未充分利用的资源：针对人群健康干预研究的队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):1730-1733. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy191.
2
Can intersectionality theory enrich population health research?交叉性理论能否丰富人口健康研究？
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:214-216. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
3
Overview of study design in clinical epidemiology.临床流行病学研究设计概述。
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Aug;76(4):244-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.244.
4
Case-Cohort Studies: Design and Applicability to Hand Surgery.病例队列研究：设计及其在手外科中的适用性
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Aug;43(8):762-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Choosing a research study design and selecting a population to study.选择研究设计并挑选研究对象。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004 Sep;8(9):1151-6.
6
Design of cohort studies for air pollution health effects.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2003;66(16-19):1723-9. doi: 10.1080/15287390306420.
7
How to design a (good) epidemiological observational study: epidemiological research protocol at a glance.如何设计一项（优秀的）流行病学观察性研究：流行病学研究方案一览
Acta Med Port. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):731-6. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
8
Transformation of health systems: contribution of population health intervention research.卫生系统转型：人群健康干预研究的贡献
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Dec;2(12):e539. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30216-5. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
Role of dietary fat in the causation of breast cancer: counterpoint.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jan;8(1):9-13.
10
Faced with the challenges of prevention, French institutions mobilize for population health intervention research.面对预防方面的挑战，法国各机构动员起来开展针对人群健康干预的研究。
Glob Health Promot. 2021 Mar;28(1_suppl):70-72. doi: 10.1177/1757975920987100.

引用本文的文献

1
Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA): health assessment protocol, participant profile and patterns of participation.北爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究队列（NICOLA）：健康评估方案、参与者特征和参与模式。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15355-x.
2
Methodological considerations in establishing and maintaining longitudinal health workforce studies: Lessons learned from the WiSDOM cohort in South Africa.建立和维护纵向卫生人力研究的方法学考虑因素：来自南非 WiSDOM 队列的经验教训。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1996688. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1996688.
3
Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers.理解参与欧洲早产儿队列研究的情况：父母、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员的观点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the utility of International Journal of Epidemiology cohort profiles.提高《国际流行病学杂志》队列简介的效用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;47(3):1008-1009. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy104.
2
Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions.扩大公共卫生干预措施的模式与成功因素的叙述性综述。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 12;10:113. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0301-6.
3
'Dark logic': theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions.“黑暗逻辑”：对公共卫生干预措施的有害后果进行理论化分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jan;69(1):95-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204671. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
4
Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute.综合复杂干预措施的证据：元分析、定性和混合方法的贡献。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1230-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施：英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.
6
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.新计划和创新的可持续性：对实证文献的回顾和对未来研究的建议。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
7
Priorities for research on equity and health: towards an equity-focused health research agenda.关于公平与健康的研究重点：制定以公平为重点的健康研究议程。
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001115. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Population-based cohort studies: still relevant?基于人群的队列研究：仍然相关吗？
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):2010-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.020.
9
South Yorkshire Cohort: a 'cohort trials facility' study of health and weight - protocol for the recruitment phase.南约克郡队列研究：一项关于健康和体重的“队列试验设施”研究——招募阶段的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 11;11:640. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-640.
10
The evolution of population science: advent of the mega cohort.人口科学的演变：大型队列的出现。
JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2288-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1691.