• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解参与欧洲早产儿队列研究的情况:父母、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员的观点。

Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers.

机构信息

EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050-091, Porto, Portugal.

Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5
PMID:33430773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7802270/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants' and researcher's perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings.

METHODS

This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages.

RESULTS

Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent.

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.

摘要

背景

在队列研究中,参与者的保留是一个主要挑战。需要更好地了解特定环境中参与和流失现象所涉及的所有因素,以便制定有效的保留策略。本研究旨在从参与者和研究人员的角度深入了解纵向队列中参与者的保留情况,跨越三个不同的社会地理和文化背景。

方法

本研究采用多情境方法的三角测量,收集丹麦、意大利和葡萄牙出生时胎龄不足 32 周的儿童队列研究的数据。它包括与相关主要参与者(即父母、工作人员、医疗保健专业人员、研究人员)进行焦点小组和个人半驱动访谈,以及合作视觉方法。收集了 48 名主要参与者(丹麦 13 名;意大利 13 名;葡萄牙 22 名)的有目的样本。应用了现象学主题分析与话语分析的三角测量。在不同层面和阶段确定了参与和流失现象涉及的跨情境和情境特定情境因素。

结果

主要发现包括:影响实施策略的潜在和可能性范围的情境挑战(地缘政治环境、社会变化、研究资助模式);与作为障碍的特定策略相关的情境因素(邮寄问卷)和促进因素(多种灵活策略、提醒、定期互动);参与和参与后续波的主要动机(利他主义/团结和感激/回报的责任感);参与后续波的主要动机障碍(缺乏联系、反馈不足);临床和研究随访的纠缠是促进和障碍。

结论

使用的多情境方法解决了个人生活经历的相互作用,对于理解不同实施策略下的参与变异性最有价值。确定了对队列中参与和流失有影响的跨情境和情境特定情境因素。

相似文献

1
Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers.理解参与欧洲早产儿队列研究的情况:父母、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员的观点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 12;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5.
2
Increased interaction and procedural flexibility favoured participation: Study across European cohorts of preterm born individuals.增加的互动和程序灵活性有利于参与:对欧洲早产个体队列的研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;143:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.027. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
3
Improving Understanding of Participation and Attrition Phenomena in European Cohort Studies: Protocol for a Multi-Situated Qualitative Study.增进对欧洲队列研究中参与和损耗现象的理解:一项多地点定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 15;9(7):e14997. doi: 10.2196/14997.
4
Survey of data collection methods and retention strategies in European birth cohorts of children and adults born very preterm.对在欧洲出生非常早产儿的儿童和成人队列中进行的数据收集方法和保留策略的调查。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;36(5):706-714. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12845. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon.个人、背景和研究特征的相互作用及其对黎巴嫩孕妇参与研究的招募和参与的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0616-5.
7
Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.分析导致女性参与(或不参与)新生儿队列研究的动机。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Apr 11;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-53.
8
Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort: Results from the TARGet Kids! longitudinal cohort study.与大型初级保健实践为基础的儿科队列研究参与相关的因素:来自 TARGet Kids!纵向队列研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 11;18(4):e0284192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284192. eCollection 2023.
9
Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区参与者对参与艾滋病病毒研究的看法和经历:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):330-420. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2051.
10
Parents' Participation in the Sexuality Education of Their Children in Namibia: A Framework and an Educational Programme for Enhanced Action.纳米比亚父母对子女性教育的参与:加强行动的框架与教育方案
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Aug 18;8(4):172-87. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p172.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies.参与者对纵向队列研究的参与度:来自一系列妊娠与分娩、双胞胎及基于家庭的人群队列研究的定性见解
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02419-8.
2
Record linkage of population-based cohort data from minors with national register data: a scoping review and comparative legal analysis of four European countries.基于人群的未成年人队列数据与国家登记数据的记录链接:四个欧洲国家的范围审查和比较法律分析
Open Res Eur. 2021 Sep 27;1:58. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13689.2. eCollection 2021.
3
Strategies for assessing the impact of loss to follow-up on estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment in a very preterm cohort at 2 years of age.评估失访对极早产儿 2 岁时神经发育损伤估计值影响的策略。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 6;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01264-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Understanding of Participation and Attrition Phenomena in European Cohort Studies: Protocol for a Multi-Situated Qualitative Study.增进对欧洲队列研究中参与和损耗现象的理解:一项多地点定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 15;9(7):e14997. doi: 10.2196/14997.
2
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纵向队列研究中的保留策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.
3
Mobilizing an underused resource: cohort studies for population health intervention research.调动未充分利用的资源:针对人群健康干预研究的队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;47(6):1730-1733. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy191.
4
Where are they now? Retention strategies over 25 years in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.他们现在在哪里?《青年成人冠状动脉风险发展研究》(CARDIA研究)中超过25年的留存策略。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Dec 20;9:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.12.003. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.如何在队列研究中调查和调整选择偏倚。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13319. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates.高保留率的纵向临床研究中的受试者保留措施。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z.
7
Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.参与者关于其加入一项附带生物样本库的队列研究的决定的描述:德国两项研究中的一项定性内容分析研究
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Jul;11(3):237-49. doi: 10.1177/1556264616657463. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Attitudes to participating in a birth cohort study, views from a multiethnic population: a qualitative study using focus groups.参与出生队列研究的态度:来自多民族人群的观点——一项采用焦点小组的定性研究
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):146-158. doi: 10.1111/hex.12445. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Postal contact with participating children and its impact on response rate: Japan Environment and Children's Pilot Study.与参与研究的儿童进行邮政联系及其对回复率的影响:日本环境与儿童试点研究
Pediatr Int. 2016 Dec;58(12):1328-1332. doi: 10.1111/ped.13019. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
My Lived Experiences Are More Important Than Your Probabilities: The Role of Individualized Risk Estimates for Decision Making about Participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).我的亲身经历比你的概率更重要:个性化风险评估在关于参与他莫昔芬和雷洛昔芬(STAR)研究决策中的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):1010-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15594382. Epub 2015 Jul 16.