Bieler D, Trentzsch H, Baacke M, Becker L, Düsing H, Heindl B, Jensen K O, Lefering R, Mand C, Özkurtul O, Paffrath T, Schweigkofler U, Sprengel K, Wohlrath B, Waydhas C
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Wiederherstellungs- und Handchirurgie, Verbrennungsmedizin, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Deutschland.
Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Oct;121(10):788-793. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0553-0.
Severely injured patients are supposed to be admitted to hospital via the trauma room. Appropriate criteria are contained in the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries (S3-GL); however, some of these criteria require scarce hospital resources while the patients then often clinically present as uninjured. There are tendencies to streamline the trauma team activation criteria (TTAC); however, additional undertriage must be avoided. A study group of the emergency, intensive care medicine and treatment of the severely injured section (NIS) is in the process of optimizing the TTAC for the German trauma system.
In order to solve the objective the following multi-step approach is necessary: a) definition of patients who potentially benefit from TTA, b) verification of the definition in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), c) carrying out a prospective, multicenter study in order to determine overtriage and undertriage, thereby validating the activation criteria and d) revision of the current TTAC.
This article summarizes the consensus criteria of the group assumed to be capable of identifying patients who potentially benefit from TTA. These criteria are used to test if TTA was justified in a specific case; however, as the TTCA of the S3-GL are not fully incorporated into the TR-DGU dataset and because cases must also be considered which were not subject to trauma room treatment and therefore were not included in the TR-DGU, it is necessary to perform a prospective full survey of all individuals in order to be able to measure overtriage and undertriage.
Currently, the TR-DGU can only provide limited evidence on the quality of the TTAC recommended in Germany. This problem has been recognized and will be solved by conducting a prospective DGU-supported study, the results of which can be used to improve the TR-DGU dataset in order to enable further considerations on the quality of care (e. g. composition and size of the trauma team).
重伤患者应通过创伤室入院。重度/多发伤患者治疗的S3指南(S3 - GL)中包含了适当的标准;然而,其中一些标准需要稀缺的医院资源,而这些患者临床上往往表现为未受伤。目前存在简化创伤团队启动标准(TTAC)的趋势;然而,必须避免额外的漏诊情况。急诊、重症医学和重伤治疗科(NIS)的一个研究小组正在优化德国创伤系统的TTAC。
为实现该目标,需要采取以下多步骤方法:a)定义可能从创伤团队启动(TTA)中受益的患者,b)在创伤登记数据库DGU®(TR - DGU)中验证该定义,c)开展一项前瞻性多中心研究以确定过度分诊和漏诊情况,从而验证启动标准,d)修订当前的TTAC。
本文总结了该小组的共识标准,这些标准被认为能够识别可能从TTA中受益的患者。这些标准用于检验在特定病例中TTA是否合理;然而,由于S3 - GL的TTCA未完全纳入TR - DGU数据集,且还必须考虑未接受创伤室治疗因此未纳入TR - DGU的病例,所以有必要对所有个体进行前瞻性全面调查,以便能够衡量过度分诊和漏诊情况。
目前,TR - DGU只能为德国推荐的TTAC质量提供有限的证据。这个问题已得到认识,并将通过开展一项由DGU支持的前瞻性研究来解决,该研究的结果可用于改进TR - DGU数据集,以便能够进一步考虑护理质量(例如创伤团队的组成和规模)。