Suppr超能文献

急诊医疗服务机构救治的成年创伤患者现场创伤分诊的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness of Field Trauma Triage among Injured Adults Served by Emergency Medical Services.

作者信息

Newgard Craig D, Yang Zhuo, Nishijima Daniel, McConnell K John, Trent Stacy A, Holmes James F, Daya Mohamud, Mann N Clay, Hsia Renee Y, Rea Tom D, Wang N Ewen, Staudenmayer Kristan, Delgado M Kit

机构信息

Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma sets national targets for the accuracy of field trauma triage at ≥95% sensitivity and ≥65% specificity, yet the cost-effectiveness of realizing these goals is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of current field trauma triage practices compared with triage strategies consistent with the national targets.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cost-effectiveness analysis using data from 79,937 injured adults transported by 48 emergency medical services agencies to 105 trauma and nontrauma hospitals in 6 regions of the western United States from 2006 through 2008. Incremental differences in survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (costs per QALY gained) were estimated for each triage strategy during a 1-year and lifetime horizon using a decision analytic Markov model. We considered an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of <$100,000 to be cost-effective.

RESULTS

For these 6 regions, a high-sensitivity triage strategy consistent with national trauma policy (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 17.1%) would cost $1,317,333 per QALY gained, and current triage practices (sensitivity 87.2%, specificity 64.0%) cost $88,000 per QALY gained, compared with a moderate sensitivity strategy (sensitivity 71.2%, specificity 66.5%). Refining emergency medical services transport patterns by triage status improved cost-effectiveness. At the trauma-system level, a high-sensitivity triage strategy would save 3.7 additional lives per year at a 1-year cost of $8.78 million, and a moderate sensitivity approach would cost 5.2 additional lives and save $781,616 each year.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-sensitivity approach to field triage consistent with national trauma policy is not cost-effective. The most cost-effective approach to field triage appears closely tied to triage specificity and adherence to triage-based emergency medical services transport practices.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学会创伤委员会设定了现场创伤分诊准确性的全国目标,即灵敏度≥95%,特异度≥65%,然而实现这些目标的成本效益尚不清楚。我们评估了当前现场创伤分诊实践与符合全国目标的分诊策略相比的成本效益。

研究设计

这是一项成本效益分析,使用了2006年至2008年期间48个紧急医疗服务机构将79937名受伤成年人转运至美国西部6个地区的105家创伤和非创伤医院的数据。使用决策分析马尔可夫模型,在1年和终身范围内估计了每种分诊策略在生存、质量调整生命年(QALY)、成本和增量成本效益比(每获得一个QALY的成本)方面的增量差异。我们认为增量成本效益比阈值<$100,000具有成本效益。

结果

对于这6个地区,与国家创伤政策一致的高灵敏度分诊策略(灵敏度98.6%,特异度17.1%)每获得一个QALY的成本为1317333美元,当前分诊实践(灵敏度87.2%,特异度64.0%)每获得一个QALY的成本为88000美元,而中度灵敏度策略(灵敏度71.2%,特异度66.5%)。根据分诊状态优化紧急医疗服务运输模式可提高成本效益。在创伤系统层面,高灵敏度分诊策略每年可多挽救3.7条生命,1年成本为878万美元,中度灵敏度方法每年会多造成5.2人死亡,但可节省781616美元。

结论

与国家创伤政策一致的高灵敏度现场分诊方法不具有成本效益。最具成本效益的现场分诊方法似乎与分诊特异度以及遵循基于分诊的紧急医疗服务运输实践密切相关。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Field Trauma Triage among Injured Adults Served by Emergency Medical Services.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
2
Cost-effectiveness of field trauma triage among injured children transported by emergency medical services.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.037. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Field Trauma Triage among Older Adults: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Feb 1;234(2):139-154. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000025.
5
Large cost savings realized from the 2006 Field Triage Guideline: reduction in overtriage in U.S. trauma centers.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):222-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.615013. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
6
Role of Guideline Adherence in Improving Field Triage.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):545-555. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308612. Epub 2017 May 1.
9
The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1591-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1142.
10
The value of trauma center care.
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21.

引用本文的文献

1
'Endless variation on a theme': a document analysis of international and UK major trauma triage tools.
Br Paramed J. 2024 Dec 1;9(3):28-36. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.12.9.3.28.
2
Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool.
Br Paramed J. 2024 Jun 1;9(1):10-22. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10.
3
The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions in English trauma networks - a case-cohort study.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 May 21;32(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01219-9.
4
The predictive value of serum lactate to forecast injury severity in trauma-patients increases taking age into account.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02046-2. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
An economic evaluation of triage tools for patients with suspected severe injuries in England.
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00557-6.
6
DRG-Oriented Mathematical Calculation Model and Method of Integrated Medical Service Cost.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 Nov 1;2020:3189676. doi: 10.1155/2020/3189676. eCollection 2020.
7
ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01410-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
Performance of pre-hospital evaluations in ruling out invasive chest stab wounds.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 5;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00725-w.
9
A validation of machine learning-based risk scores in the prehospital setting.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226518. eCollection 2019.
10
Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):356-362. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004515. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective Validation of the National Field Triage Guidelines for Identifying Seriously Injured Persons.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):146-58.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
2
Comparison of Mortality and Costs at Trauma and Nontrauma Centers for Minor and Moderately Severe Injuries in California.
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;67(1):56-67.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 May 23.
3
Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):796-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1405158.
5
Undertriage of major trauma patients in the US emergency departments.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):997-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
United States life tables, 2008.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012 Sep 24;61(3):1-63.
7
The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1591-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1142.
8
Should helicopters dispatched for EMS trauma response be grounded?
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):365-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
9
The trade-offs in field trauma triage: a multiregion assessment of accuracy metrics and volume shifts associated with different triage strategies.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1298-306; discussion 1306. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b7848.
10
Cost-effectiveness of helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for trauma scene transport in the United States.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):351-364.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.025. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验