• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者体验反馈存在哪些问题?基于一项英国内三个地点的定性研究结果的宏观和微观理解。

What's the problem with patient experience feedback? A macro and micro understanding, based on findings from a three-site UK qualitative study.

机构信息

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals and School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12829. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12829
PMID:30244499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6351417/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Collecting feedback from patients about their experiences of health care is an important activity. However, improvement based on this feedback rarely materializes. In this study, we focus on answering the question-"what is impeding the use of patient experience feedback?"

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study in 2016 across three NHS hospital Trusts in the North of England. Focus groups were undertaken with ward-based staff, and hospital managers were interviewed in-depth (50 participants). We conducted a conceptual-level analysis.

FINDINGS

On a macro level, we found that the intense focus on the collection of patient experience feedback has developed into its own self-perpetuating industry with a significant allocation of resource, effort and time being expended on this task. This is often at the expense of pan-organizational learning or improvements being made. On a micro level, ward staff struggled to interact with feedback due to its complexity with questions raised about the value, validity and timeliness of data sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Macro and micro prohibiting factors come together in a perfect storm which provides a substantial impediment to improvements being made. Recommendations for policy change are put forward alongside recognition that high-level organizational culture/systems are currently too sluggish to allow fruitful learning and action to occur from the feedback that patients give.

摘要

背景

收集患者对其医疗体验的反馈是一项重要的活动。然而,基于这些反馈的改进很少实现。在这项研究中,我们专注于回答一个问题——“是什么阻碍了患者体验反馈的使用?”

方法

我们在 2016 年在英格兰北部的三个 NHS 医院信托机构进行了一项定性研究。对病房工作人员进行了焦点小组讨论,并对医院管理人员进行了深入访谈(50 名参与者)。我们进行了概念层面的分析。

结果

在宏观层面上,我们发现对患者体验反馈的强烈关注已经发展成为一个自我维持的行业,大量的资源、精力和时间都投入到了这项任务中。这往往是以牺牲组织整体学习或改进为代价的。在微观层面上,病房工作人员由于反馈的复杂性而难以与反馈互动,这些反馈引发了对数据源的价值、有效性和及时性的质疑。

结论

宏观和微观上的阻碍因素共同作用,形成了一场完美风暴,这对改进造成了巨大的阻碍。我们提出了政策变革的建议,并认识到,目前高层组织文化/系统过于迟缓,无法从患者提供的反馈中进行有益的学习和采取行动。

相似文献

1
What's the problem with patient experience feedback? A macro and micro understanding, based on findings from a three-site UK qualitative study.患者体验反馈存在哪些问题?基于一项英国内三个地点的定性研究结果的宏观和微观理解。
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):46-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12829. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
2
The Patient Feedback Response Framework - Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study.患者反馈响应框架——了解英国医院工作人员为何难以根据患者反馈做出改进:一项定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.实施一项调查,让患者在护理交接后提供安全体验反馈:一项可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4447-9.
4
Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial.促进患者体验反馈可以改善护理:一项 III 期整群随机对照试验的试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 4;13:259. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-259.
5
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.
6
The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice.患者体验调查在质量保证与改进中的作用:一项针对英国全科医疗的焦点小组研究
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1982-94. doi: 10.1111/hex.12298. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Patient experience feedback in UK hospitals: What types are available and what are their potential roles in quality improvement (QI)?英国医院的患者体验反馈:有哪些类型可用,它们在质量改进 (QI) 中的潜在作用是什么?
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):317-326. doi: 10.1111/hex.12885. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
The use of patient experience survey data by out-of-hours primary care services: a qualitative interview study.非工作时间初级医疗服务对患者体验调查数据的使用:一项定性访谈研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):851-859. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003963. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
The use of patient feedback by hospital boards of directors: a qualitative study of two NHS hospitals in England.医院董事会对患者反馈的使用:英格兰两家国民保健制度医院的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb;27(2):103-109. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006312. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and surgeon perspectives of a large-scale system for automated, real-time monitoring and feedback of shared decision-making integrated into surgical practice: a qualitative study.患者与外科医生对整合于外科实践中的共享决策自动化实时监测与反馈大规模系统的看法:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e099090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099090.
2
Recognising the Value of Everyday Interactions in Inpatient CAMHS: Patient Thank-You Letters as Insights Into Nursing Impact.认识住院儿童与青少年精神健康服务中日常互动的价值:患者感谢信作为洞察护理影响的依据
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70062. doi: 10.1111/inm.70062.
3
Unlocking Patient and Professional Value Through Patient Experience: Preliminary Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment of In-Center Hemodialysis (PEACHD) Survey.通过患者体验释放患者和专业价值:中心血液透析患者体验评估(PEACHD)调查的初步开发与验证
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 13;12:23743735251314653. doi: 10.1177/23743735251314653. eCollection 2025.
4
All the voices we cannot hear: a taxonomy of why some populations' experiences are missing from health and care quality evidence and the Toolkit for Assessing Under Representation in User Surveys (TAURUS).我们听不到的所有声音:关于为何某些人群的经历在健康与护理质量证据中缺失的分类,以及用户调查中代表性不足评估工具包(TAURUS)。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e087627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087627.
5
Exploration of policy feedback mechanism for healthcare improvement in China: a grounded theory model.中国医疗保健改善政策反馈机制探索:一个扎根理论模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 30;12:1496836. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1496836. eCollection 2025.
6
Exploring effective patient feedback methods for eHealth in general practice.探索全科医疗中电子健康领域有效的患者反馈方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 13;26(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02725-0.
7
Healthcare Professionals' Responses to Complaints: A Qualitative Interview Study With Patients, Carers and Healthcare Professionals Using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model.医疗保健专业人员对投诉的回应:一项使用理论领域框架和COM-B模型对患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员进行的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70118. doi: 10.1111/hex.70118.
8
Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.了解英国二级和三级医疗保健机构中医护人员对患者投诉的反应:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价和行为分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 1;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.
9
The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Managers on Patient Involvement in Care Pathway Development: A Discourse Analysis.医疗保健专业人员和管理人员对患者参与护理路径制定的看法:话语分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14101. doi: 10.1111/hex.14101.
10
Evaluation of Unsolicited Feedback from Patients with Cancer and Their Families as a Strategy to Improve Cancer Care Delivery.评估癌症患者及其家属的非预期反馈作为改善癌症护理提供的策略。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 28;31(5):2488-2496. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050186.

本文引用的文献

1
Can we fix the uber-complexities of healthcare?我们能解决医疗保健领域极其复杂的问题吗?
J R Soc Med. 2017 Oct;110(10):392-394. doi: 10.1177/0141076817728419. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
'It's sometimes hard to tell what patients are playing at': How healthcare professionals make sense of why patients and families complain about care.“有时很难弄清楚患者在搞什么鬼”:医护人员如何理解患者和家属为何对医护工作提出抱怨。
Health (London). 2018 Nov;22(6):603-623. doi: 10.1177/1363459317724853. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
The use of patient feedback by hospital boards of directors: a qualitative study of two NHS hospitals in England.医院董事会对患者反馈的使用:英格兰两家国民保健制度医院的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb;27(2):103-109. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006312. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
4
How do hospital boards govern for quality improvement? A mixed methods study of 15 organisations in England.医院董事会如何进行质量管理?一项对英格兰 15 家机构的混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):978-986. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006433. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
5
A 'movement for improvement'? A qualitative study of the adoption of social movement strategies in the implementation of a quality improvement campaign.一场“改进运动”?一项关于在质量改进活动实施过程中采用社会运动策略的定性研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Sep;39(7):1083-1099. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12560. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
The Patient Feedback Response Framework - Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study.患者反馈响应框架——了解英国医院工作人员为何难以根据患者反馈做出改进:一项定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention.患者参与能否提高患者安全性?患者报告与安全环境行动(PRASE)干预的整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):622-631. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005570. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
The patient reporting and action for a safe environment (PRASE) intervention: a feasibility study.患者报告与安全环境行动(PRASE)干预措施:一项可行性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 28;16(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1919-z.
9
Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings.关于在医疗环境中使用患者体验数据进行质量改进的方法的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e011907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907.
10
Can we use patient-reported feedback to drive change? The challenges of using patient-reported feedback and how they might be addressed.我们能否利用患者报告的反馈来推动变革?使用患者报告反馈所面临的挑战以及应对这些挑战的方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jun;26(6):502-507. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005223. Epub 2016 Jun 20.