Bradford Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare experiences. However, healthcare staff often find it difficult to act on this feedback in order to make improvements to services. This paper draws upon notions of legitimacy and readiness to develop a conceptual framework (Patient Feedback Response Framework - PFRF) which outlines why staff may find it problematic to respond to patient feedback. A large qualitative study was conducted with 17 ward based teams between 2013 and 2014, across three hospital Trusts in the North of England. This was a process evaluation of a wider study where ward staff were encouraged to make action plans based on patient feedback. We focus on three methods here: i) examination of taped discussion between ward staff during action planning meetings ii) facilitators notes of these meetings iii) telephone interviews with staff focusing on whether action plans had been achieved six months later. Analysis employed an abductive approach. Through the development of the PFRF, we found that making changes based on patient feedback is a complex multi-tiered process and not something that ward staff can simply 'do'. First, staff must exhibit normative legitimacy - the belief that listening to patients is a worthwhile exercise. Second, structural legitimacy has to be in place - ward teams need adequate autonomy, ownership and resource to enact change. Some ward teams are able to make improvements within their immediate control and environment. Third, for those staff who require interdepartmental co-operation or high level assistance to achieve change, organisational readiness must exist at the level of the hospital otherwise improvement will rarely be enacted. Case studies drawn from our empirical data demonstrate the above. It is only when appropriate levels of individual and organisational capacity to change exist, that patient feedback is likely to be acted upon to improve services.
患者越来越多地被要求对其医疗保健体验提供反馈。然而,医护人员常常发现难以根据这些反馈采取行动,从而改进服务。本文借鉴了合法性和准备就绪的概念,提出了一个概念框架(患者反馈响应框架-PFRF),该框架概述了为什么工作人员可能发现难以回应患者的反馈。2013 年至 2014 年期间,在英格兰北部的三个医院信托基金中,对 17 个基于病房的团队进行了一项大型定性研究。这是对一项更广泛研究的过程评估,该研究鼓励病房工作人员根据患者反馈制定行动计划。我们在此重点关注三种方法:i)检查行动规划会议期间病房工作人员之间的录音讨论;ii)这些会议的协调员记录;iii)对工作人员进行的电话访谈,重点是六个月后行动计划是否已经完成。分析采用了溯因方法。通过 PFRF 的发展,我们发现,基于患者反馈做出改变是一个复杂的多层次过程,病房工作人员不能简单地“完成”。首先,工作人员必须表现出规范性合法性——即倾听患者意见是一项有价值的做法。其次,必须具备结构性合法性——病房团队需要足够的自主权、所有权和资源来实施变革。一些病房团队能够在其直接控制和环境内做出改进。第三,对于那些需要部门间合作或高层协助才能实现变革的工作人员,医院必须具备组织准备就绪的水平,否则很少能实施改进。我们的实证数据中的案例研究证明了上述观点。只有当存在适当的个人和组织变革能力时,患者的反馈才有可能被采纳,以改善服务。