Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:177-184.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.110. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
To assess the extent to which social and family factors explain variability in cognitive, language, and motor development among very preterm (<30 weeks of gestation) children from 2 to 5 years of age.
As part of a longitudinal study, very preterm children recruited as neonates were assessed at 2 (n = 87) and 5 (n = 83) years of age using standardized tests of cognitive, language, and motor ability alongside demographically matched full term (FT) children (n = 63). For very preterm children, developmental change scores were calculated for each domain to assess within-individual variability to 5 years of age. Multivariate regression and mixed-effect models examined social risk index, parenting stress, family functioning, and maternal intellectual ability as predictors of developmental variation among very preterm children.
Very preterm children demonstrated poorer cognitive, language, and motor abilities than FT children at 2 (P ≤ .001) and 5 (P < .002) years of age. Social adversity was associated with cognitive (P < .001) and language (P < .001) outcomes at both ages, with parenting stress also related to cognitive outcomes (P = .03). Infant medical risk was associated with motor outcome at 5 years (P=.01). Very preterm children showed considerable within-individual variation between assessments. Among very preterm children, neonatal white matter abnormalities predicted worsening cognitive (P=.04) and motor development (P = .01). Social risk index predicted worsening language development (P = .04), but this association was subsequently explained by dysfunctional maternal affective involvement (P = .01) and lower maternal intellectual ability (P = .05).
Both clinical and socioenvironmental factors are associated with cognitive, language, and motor developmental variation among very preterm children from infancy to early school age.
评估社会和家庭因素在多大程度上解释了极早产儿(<30 孕周)儿童从 2 岁到 5 岁期间认知、语言和运动发育的差异。
作为一项纵向研究的一部分,在新生儿期招募的极早产儿在 2 岁(n=87)和 5 岁(n=83)时使用认知、语言和运动能力的标准化测试进行评估,同时还包括在人口统计学上匹配的足月(FT)儿童(n=63)。对于极早产儿,为每个领域计算发育变化分数,以评估个体在 5 岁时的变异性。多元回归和混合效应模型检查了社会风险指数、育儿压力、家庭功能和母亲智力能力作为极早产儿发育差异的预测因素。
极早产儿在 2 岁(P≤0.001)和 5 岁(P<0.002)时表现出比 FT 儿童更差的认知、语言和运动能力。社会逆境与两个年龄段的认知(P<0.001)和语言(P<0.001)结果相关,育儿压力也与认知结果相关(P=0.03)。婴儿期的医疗风险与 5 岁时的运动结果相关(P=0.01)。极早产儿在评估之间表现出相当大的个体内变异。在极早产儿中,新生儿白质异常预测认知(P=0.04)和运动发育恶化(P=0.01)。社会风险指数预测语言发育恶化(P=0.04),但这种关联随后被功能失调的母亲情感投入(P=0.01)和较低的母亲智力能力(P=0.05)所解释。
临床和社会环境因素都与极早产儿从婴儿期到早期学龄期的认知、语言和运动发育差异相关。