Suppr超能文献

肥胖与机械通气撤机——一项探索性研究

Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Obi Ogugua Ndili, Mazer Mark, Bangley Charles, Kassabo Zuheir, Saadah Khalid, Trainor Wayne, Stephens Kenneth, Rice Patricia L, Shaw Robert

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Department of Respiratory Care, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2018 Sep 18;12:1179548418801004. doi: 10.1177/1179548418801004. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with increased risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure, prolonged duration on mechanical ventilation, and extended weaning periods.

OBJECTIVE

Pilot study to determine whether morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (body mass index [BMI] ⩾ 40) can be more efficiently weaned from the ventilator by optimizing their positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using either an esophageal balloon or the best achieved static effective compliance.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 25 morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (median [interquartile range] BMI 53.4 [26.4]; range 40.4-113.8) to 1 of 2 methods of setting PEEP; using either titration guided by esophageal balloon to overcome negative transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) (goal Ptp 0-5 cmHO) (ESO group) or titration to maximize static effective lung compliance (Cstat group). Our outcomes of interest were number of subjects weaned by day 30 and time to wean.

RESULTS

At day 30, there was no significant difference in percentage of subjects weaned. 8/13 subjects (62%) in the ESO Group were weaned vs. 9/12(75%) in the Cstat Group ( = 0.67). Among the 17 subjects who weaned, median time to ventilator liberation was significantly shorter in the ESO group: 3.5 days vs Cstat group 14 days ( = .01). Optimal PEEP in the ESO and Cstat groups was similar (ESO mean ± SD = 26.5 ± 5.7 cmHO and Cstat 24.2 ± 7 cmHO ( = .38).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of PEEP using esophageal balloon to achieve positive transpulmonary pressure did not change the proportion of patients weaned. Among patients who weaned, use of the esophageal balloon resulted in faster liberation from mechanical ventilation. There were no adverse consequences of the high PEEP (mean 25.4; range 13-37 cmHO) used in our study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution (UMCIRB#10-0343) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02323009).

摘要

引言

肥胖与高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭风险增加、机械通气时间延长以及撤机时间延长有关。

目的

进行一项初步研究,以确定病态肥胖的成年气管切开患者(体重指数[BMI]⩾40)是否可以通过使用食管气囊或最佳静态有效顺应性来优化呼气末正压(PEEP),从而更有效地从呼吸机上撤机。

方法

我们将25名病态肥胖的成年气管切开患者(中位数[四分位间距]BMI为53.4[26.4];范围为40.4 - 113.8)随机分配至2种设置PEEP的方法之一;一种是通过食管气囊滴定以克服负跨肺压(Ptp)(目标Ptp为0 - 5cmH₂O)(食管气囊组),另一种是滴定以最大化静态有效肺顺应性(Cstat组)。我们感兴趣的结果是30天时撤机的患者数量和撤机时间。

结果

在第30天时,撤机患者的百分比无显著差异。食管气囊组13名患者中有8名(62%)撤机,而Cstat组12名患者中有9名(75%)撤机(P = 0.67)。在17名撤机的患者中,食管气囊组的呼吸机撤机中位时间显著更短:3.5天,而Cstat组为14天(P = 0.01)。食管气囊组和Cstat组的最佳PEEP相似(食管气囊组均值±标准差 = 26.5±5.7cmH₂O,Cstat组为24.2±7cmH₂O(P = 0.38)。

结论

使用食管气囊优化PEEP以实现正跨肺压并没有改变撤机患者的比例。在撤机的患者中,使用食管气囊导致机械通气撤机更快。我们研究中使用的高PEEP(平均25.4;范围13 - 37cmH₂O)没有不良后果。该研究已获得我们机构的机构审查委员会批准(UMCIRB#10 - 0343)并在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT02323009)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2649/6144576/97d3a0627433/10.1177_1179548418801004-fig3.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验