Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Nov;38(11):1106-1119. doi: 10.1002/phar.2183. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Five RCTs, which included 1959 patients, compared the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in patients with hyperuricemia associated with gout.
Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size by using a random-effect model. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving target serum uric acid (sUA) levels by month 6 and the mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12. Gout-related outcomes were also assessed. The secondary outcome was the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Compared with xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) monotherapy, lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with allopurinol or febuxostat exhibited a higher proportion of patients achieving target sUA levels of < 6.0 mg/dl or < 5.0 mg/dl, respectively, by month 6. Lesinurad-plus-XOI groups also significantly sustained lower mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12 compared to XOI alone group. In gout-related outcomes, no significant treatment group differences favored lesinurad. The number of TEAEs was comparable between the lesinurad 200 mg-plus-XOI group and the XOI-monotherapy group. Although lesinurad 400 mg monotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo, significantly more TEAEs occurred.
Although the combination of lesinurad 200 mg and XOI is effective and well tolerated for treating patients with gout who have not achieved an adequate response to XOI monotherapy, clinical gout-related outcomes were not improved. Therefore, additional studies investigating the long-term clinical implication of lesinurad are warranted.
评估乐瑞卡(lesinurad)治疗痛风患者高尿酸血症的疗效和安全性。
系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析。
五项 RCT 纳入了 1959 名患者,比较了乐瑞卡治疗痛风相关高尿酸血症患者的疗效和安全性。
从 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆数据库和 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册中心确定了相关研究。两名审查员独立评估了研究。对个体效应量进行标准化,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析以计算合并效应量。主要结局是 6 个月时达到目标血清尿酸(sUA)水平的患者比例以及 6 个月和 12 个月时的平均 sUA 水平。还评估了痛风相关结局。次要结局是治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的数量。与黄嘌呤氧化酶抑制剂(XOI)单药治疗相比,乐瑞卡 200mg 或 400mg 联合别嘌醇或非布司他在 6 个月时分别使更多的患者达到了<6.0mg/dl 或<5.0mg/dl 的目标 sUA 水平。乐瑞卡+XOI 组在 6 个月和 12 个月时的平均 sUA 水平也显著低于 XOI 单药组。在痛风相关结局方面,乐瑞卡治疗组与 XOI 单药治疗组之间没有显著的治疗效果差异。乐瑞卡 200mg+XOI 组与 XOI 单药治疗组的 TEAE 数量相当。尽管乐瑞卡 400mg 单药治疗与安慰剂相比疗效更优,但发生了更多的 TEAE。
尽管乐瑞卡 200mg 与 XOI 的联合使用对于治疗未能对 XOI 单药治疗产生充分反应的痛风患者是有效且耐受良好的,但并未改善临床相关的痛风结局。因此,需要进行更多研究来探讨乐瑞卡的长期临床意义。