Georgetown University Medical Center.
Gertler & Wente Architects LLP, New York, New York, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jun;38(6):1405-1409. doi: 10.1002/jum.14818. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Focused cardiac ultrasonography (FCU) is an increasingly integral component of routine medical training and practice. While various instructional methods have been described, few attempts have been made to incorporate a physical 3-dimensional (3D) instructional aid.
The aim of this study was to determine if a 3D printed heart model workshop for FCU instruction leads to equivalent structure recognition and scanning ability compared to traditional didactic FCU instruction.
Twenty first-year medical students with no point-of-care ultrasonography experience were randomly assigned to a traditional lecture (n = 10) or a 3D printed heart model workshop (n = 10). Written examinations at 0 and 3 months as well as image acquisition at 3 months were compared.
The median scores from the initial written structure identification in the traditional and 3D heart groups were 74% and 90%, respectively (P = 0.7). The second written exam at 3 months yielded median scores of 56% and 58% in the traditional and 3D heart groups, respectively (P = 0.8). The average scores on the image acquisition practical at 3 months were 3.3 of 5 and 2.7 of 5 (P = 0.1) in the traditional and 3D heart groups, respectively.
Utilizing 3D heart models in an FCU workshop format results in similar skill acquisition and knowledge retention as traditional didactics. The 3D heart models are relatively inexpensive, portable, and reusable, enabling learners to practice repeatedly and at flexible intervals. The reduction in ongoing expenses and the ability to teach large groups may decrease training costs as well as the need for local faculty expertise.
心脏超声聚焦(FCU)是常规医学培训和实践中日益不可或缺的组成部分。虽然已经描述了各种教学方法,但很少有人尝试将物理 3 维(3D)教学辅助工具纳入其中。
本研究旨在确定 FCU 教学中使用 3D 打印心脏模型研讨会是否与传统的 FCU 教学相比导致同等的结构识别和扫描能力。
20 名没有即时超声检查经验的一年级医学生被随机分配到传统讲座(n=10)或 3D 打印心脏模型研讨会(n=10)。比较 0 个月和 3 个月的书面考试以及 3 个月的图像采集。
传统和 3D 心脏组的初始书面结构识别的中位数分数分别为 74%和 90%(P=0.7)。3 个月时的第二次书面考试,传统和 3D 心脏组的中位数分数分别为 56%和 58%(P=0.8)。3 个月时的图像采集实践平均得分为 3.3 分(满分 5 分)和 2.7 分(满分 5 分)(P=0.1),传统和 3D 心脏组分别为 3.3 分和 2.7 分。
在 FCU 研讨会格式中使用 3D 心脏模型可获得与传统教学类似的技能获取和知识保留。3D 心脏模型相对便宜、便携且可重复使用,使学习者能够在灵活的间隔内反复练习。减少持续支出和教授大群体的能力可能会降低培训成本以及对当地教师专业知识的需求。