Suppr超能文献

正常听力成人的噪声下言语识别:AzBio、BKB-SIN 和 QuickSIN 的年龄常模表现。

Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e972-e978. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Characterize performance for adults aged 20 to 79 years with normal hearing on tasks of AzBio, Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise (BKB-SIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN), and acoustic Quick Spectral Modulation Detection (QSMD) in the sound field.

SETTING

Cochlear implant (CI) program.

PATIENTS

Eighty-one adults with normal hearing and cognitive function were recruited evenly across four age groups (20-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 yr).

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects completed AzBio sentence recognition testing in quiet and in five signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs: +10, +5, 0, -5, -10 dB), as well as the BKB-SIN, QuickSIN, and QSMD tasks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AzBio, BKB-SIN, QuickSIN, and acoustic QSMD scores were analyzed to characterize typical sound field performance in an older adult population with normal hearing.

RESULTS

AzBio sentence recognition performance approached ceiling for sentences presented at ≥ 0 dB SNR with mean scores ranging from 3.5% at -10 dB SNR to 99% at +10 dB SNR. Mean QuickSIN SNR-50 was -0.02. Mean BKB-SIN SNR-50 was -1.31 dB. Mean acoustic QSMD score was 88%. Performance for all measures decreased with age.

CONCLUSION

Adults with age-normative hearing achieve ceiling-level performance for AzBio sentence recognition at SNRs used for clinical cochlear implant and/or hearing aid testing. Thus, these tasks are not inherently contraindicated for older listeners. Older adults with normal hearing, however, demonstrated greater deficits for speech in noise compared to younger listeners-an effect most pronounced at negative SNRs. Lastly, BKB-SIN data obtained in the sound field replicated previous normative data for only the youngest age group, suggesting that new norms should be considered for older populations.

摘要

目的

描述年龄在 20 至 79 岁、听力正常的成年人在 AzBio、Bamford-Kowal-Bench 言语噪声比(BKB-SIN)、快速言语噪声比(QuickSIN)和声学快速频谱调制检测(QSMD)任务中的表现。

设置

人工耳蜗(CI)项目。

患者

81 名听力和认知功能正常的成年人按年龄分为四组(20-49 岁、50-59 岁、60-69 岁和 70-79 岁),每组各有 21 人。

干预措施

受试者在安静环境和五个信噪比(SNR:+10、+5、0、-5、-10dB)下完成了 AzBio 句子识别测试,以及 BKB-SIN、QuickSIN 和 QSMD 任务。

主要观察指标

分析 AzBio、BKB-SIN、QuickSIN 和声学 QSMD 评分,以描述听力正常的老年人群的典型声场表现。

结果

在 SNR≥0dB 的情况下,AzBio 句子识别的表现接近上限,平均得分范围从-10dB SNR 时的 3.5%到+10dB SNR 时的 99%。平均 QuickSIN SNR-50 为-0.02dB。平均 BKB-SIN SNR-50 为-1.31dB。平均声学 QSMD 评分为 88%。所有指标的表现均随年龄的增长而下降。

结论

听力正常的成年人在用于临床人工耳蜗和/或助听器测试的 SNR 下,可达到 AzBio 句子识别的上限水平。因此,这些任务对老年听众来说并不是固有禁忌的。然而,听力正常的老年成年人在噪声中的言语表现比年轻成年人表现出更大的缺陷,这种效应在负 SNR 时最为明显。最后,声场中的 BKB-SIN 数据仅复制了最年轻年龄组的先前正常数据,这表明应该为老年人群考虑新的正常数据。

相似文献

4
Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults.
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(5):377-387. doi: 10.1159/000523914. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jun;22(6):375-86. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.6.6.
7
BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):401-10. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a16379.
9
Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Oct;27(9):701-713. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15026.

引用本文的文献

3
Enhanced neural speech tracking through noise indicates stochastic resonance in humans.
Elife. 2025 Mar 18;13:RP100830. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100830.
4
Remote microphone systems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review.
Codas. 2025 Feb 24;37(2):e20230310. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310pt. eCollection 2025.
6
How does the human brain process noisy speech in real life? Insights from the second-person neuroscience perspective.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Apr;18(2):371-382. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09924-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
7
Speech-in-Noise Testing: An Introduction for Audiologists.
Semin Hear. 2023 Sep 11;45(1):55-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770155. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Effects of aging on cortical representations of continuous speech.
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jun 1;129(6):1359-1377. doi: 10.1152/jn.00356.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Design and Development of a Spanish Hearing Test for Speech in Noise (PAHRE).
Audiol Res. 2022 Dec 30;13(1):32-48. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13010004.

本文引用的文献

2
AzBio Speech Understanding Performance in Quiet and Noise in High Performing Cochlear Implant Users.
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):571-575. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001765.
3
Current Profile of Adults Presenting for Preoperative Cochlear Implant Evaluation.
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518755288. doi: 10.1177/2331216518755288.
5
Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):3019-3026. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0035.
6
Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2368-2374. doi: 10.1002/lary.26513. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 30;7:1268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268. eCollection 2016.
10
Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Auditory Temporal Fine Structure.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:1-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验