• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常听力成人的噪声下言语识别:AzBio、BKB-SIN 和 QuickSIN 的年龄常模表现。

Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e972-e978. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002003.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002003
PMID:30247429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6242733/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Characterize performance for adults aged 20 to 79 years with normal hearing on tasks of AzBio, Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise (BKB-SIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN), and acoustic Quick Spectral Modulation Detection (QSMD) in the sound field.

SETTING

Cochlear implant (CI) program.

PATIENTS

Eighty-one adults with normal hearing and cognitive function were recruited evenly across four age groups (20-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 yr).

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects completed AzBio sentence recognition testing in quiet and in five signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs: +10, +5, 0, -5, -10 dB), as well as the BKB-SIN, QuickSIN, and QSMD tasks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AzBio, BKB-SIN, QuickSIN, and acoustic QSMD scores were analyzed to characterize typical sound field performance in an older adult population with normal hearing.

RESULTS

AzBio sentence recognition performance approached ceiling for sentences presented at ≥ 0 dB SNR with mean scores ranging from 3.5% at -10 dB SNR to 99% at +10 dB SNR. Mean QuickSIN SNR-50 was -0.02. Mean BKB-SIN SNR-50 was -1.31 dB. Mean acoustic QSMD score was 88%. Performance for all measures decreased with age.

CONCLUSION

Adults with age-normative hearing achieve ceiling-level performance for AzBio sentence recognition at SNRs used for clinical cochlear implant and/or hearing aid testing. Thus, these tasks are not inherently contraindicated for older listeners. Older adults with normal hearing, however, demonstrated greater deficits for speech in noise compared to younger listeners-an effect most pronounced at negative SNRs. Lastly, BKB-SIN data obtained in the sound field replicated previous normative data for only the youngest age group, suggesting that new norms should be considered for older populations.

摘要

目的

描述年龄在 20 至 79 岁、听力正常的成年人在 AzBio、Bamford-Kowal-Bench 言语噪声比(BKB-SIN)、快速言语噪声比(QuickSIN)和声学快速频谱调制检测(QSMD)任务中的表现。

设置

人工耳蜗(CI)项目。

患者

81 名听力和认知功能正常的成年人按年龄分为四组(20-49 岁、50-59 岁、60-69 岁和 70-79 岁),每组各有 21 人。

干预措施

受试者在安静环境和五个信噪比(SNR:+10、+5、0、-5、-10dB)下完成了 AzBio 句子识别测试,以及 BKB-SIN、QuickSIN 和 QSMD 任务。

主要观察指标

分析 AzBio、BKB-SIN、QuickSIN 和声学 QSMD 评分,以描述听力正常的老年人群的典型声场表现。

结果

在 SNR≥0dB 的情况下,AzBio 句子识别的表现接近上限,平均得分范围从-10dB SNR 时的 3.5%到+10dB SNR 时的 99%。平均 QuickSIN SNR-50 为-0.02dB。平均 BKB-SIN SNR-50 为-1.31dB。平均声学 QSMD 评分为 88%。所有指标的表现均随年龄的增长而下降。

结论

听力正常的成年人在用于临床人工耳蜗和/或助听器测试的 SNR 下,可达到 AzBio 句子识别的上限水平。因此,这些任务对老年听众来说并不是固有禁忌的。然而,听力正常的老年成年人在噪声中的言语表现比年轻成年人表现出更大的缺陷,这种效应在负 SNR 时最为明显。最后,声场中的 BKB-SIN 数据仅复制了最年轻年龄组的先前正常数据,这表明应该为老年人群考虑新的正常数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf6/6242733/f31c76909469/nihms-1503585-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf6/6242733/f31c76909469/nihms-1503585-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf6/6242733/f31c76909469/nihms-1503585-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.正常听力成人的噪声下言语识别:AzBio、BKB-SIN 和 QuickSIN 的年龄常模表现。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e972-e978. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002003.
2
Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.听力正常儿童的言语理解:BabyBio、BKB-SIN和QuickSIN的声场标准数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Feb;37(2):e50-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000907.
3
List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.具有正常听力敏感度的听众或人工耳蜗植入者在噪声环境下的AzBio句子测试列表等效性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(7):501-9. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.2.
4
Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults.双侧人工耳蜗植入对年轻和老年成人双耳聆听任务的影响。
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(5):377-387. doi: 10.1159/000523914. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.对正常听力听众和听力损失听众使用BKB-SIN、HINT、QuickSIN和WIN材料的评估。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):844-56. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).
6
Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.将BKB-SIN测试改编为儿科辅助结局测量方法。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jun;22(6):375-86. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.6.6.
7
BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.BKB-SIN和ANL可预测人工耳蜗使用者的感知沟通能力。
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):401-10. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a16379.
8
Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.噪声和混响对正常听力儿童和成人言语识别性能的联合影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):336-44. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514.
9
Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.人工耳蜗使用者时间处理与言语感知的行为测量
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Oct;27(9):701-713. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15026.
10
Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.信号类型和噪声背景对爆炸暴露退伍军人听觉诱发电位N1、P2和P3测量的影响
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):106-121. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000906.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related auditory nerve deficits propagate central gain throughout the auditory system: Associations with cortical microstructure and speech recognition.与年龄相关的听觉神经缺陷在整个听觉系统中传播中枢增益:与皮质微结构和言语识别的关联。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 21:2025.05.19.654964. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.19.654964.
2
Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners.认知与感知的个体差异可预测听力正常听众在噪声中语音的神经处理过程。
eNeuro. 2025 Apr 29;12(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0381-24.2025. Print 2025 Apr.
3
Enhanced neural speech tracking through noise indicates stochastic resonance in humans.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Age on Speech-in-Noise Identification: Subjective Ratings of Hearing Difficulties and Encoding of Fundamental Frequency in Older Adults.年龄对噪声中言语识别的影响:老年人听力困难的主观评分及基频编码
J Audiol Otol. 2018 Jun;22(3):134-139. doi: 10.7874/jao.2017.00304. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
AzBio Speech Understanding Performance in Quiet and Noise in High Performing Cochlear Implant Users.在高性能人工耳蜗使用者中,AzBio 语音理解在安静和噪声环境下的表现。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):571-575. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001765.
3
Current Profile of Adults Presenting for Preoperative Cochlear Implant Evaluation.
通过噪声增强的神经语音跟踪表明人类存在随机共振。
Elife. 2025 Mar 18;13:RP100830. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100830.
4
Remote microphone systems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review.自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年的远程麦克风系统:一项范围综述
Codas. 2025 Feb 24;37(2):e20230310. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310pt. eCollection 2025.
5
Individual differences in the perception of phonetic category structure predict speech-in-noise performance.个体在感知语音范畴结构方面的差异预测了在噪声环境下的言语表现。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Sep 1;156(3):1707-1719. doi: 10.1121/10.0028583.
6
How does the human brain process noisy speech in real life? Insights from the second-person neuroscience perspective.在现实生活中,人类大脑是如何处理嘈杂语音的?来自第二人称神经科学视角的见解。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Apr;18(2):371-382. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09924-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
7
Speech-in-Noise Testing: An Introduction for Audiologists.噪声环境下言语测试:听力学家指南
Semin Hear. 2023 Sep 11;45(1):55-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770155. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
A data-driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults.一种基于数据的方法,用于识别成人听觉处理障碍测试转介的快速筛查器。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 21;13(1):13636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0.
9
Effects of aging on cortical representations of continuous speech.衰老对连续语音皮质代表的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jun 1;129(6):1359-1377. doi: 10.1152/jn.00356.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Design and Development of a Spanish Hearing Test for Speech in Noise (PAHRE).西班牙语噪声环境下言语听力测试(PAHRE)的设计与开发
Audiol Res. 2022 Dec 30;13(1):32-48. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13010004.
当前行术前人工耳蜗植入评估的成年人概况。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518755288. doi: 10.1177/2331216518755288.
4
Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns.美国神经耳科学会人工耳蜗植入调查:第2部分,手术及与设备相关的实践模式
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jan;39(1):e20-e27. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001631.
5
Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.佩戴人工耳蜗的听众在复杂聆听环境中的言语理解
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):3019-3026. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0035.
6
Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.评估用于确定成人人工耳蜗植入候选资格的修订指征。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2368-2374. doi: 10.1002/lary.26513. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?符合医疗保险人工耳蜗植入标准但仅在噪声环境下符合标准而在安静环境下不符合的老年人:手术能改善这些患者的状况吗?
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Feb;38(2):187-191. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001271.
8
On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.关于工作记忆在听力阈值正常的听众噪声环境语音处理中的(非)重要性
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 30;7:1268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268. eCollection 2016.
9
Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.年龄和工作记忆容量对听力正常的听众在噪声环境中言语识别能力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):593-602. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316.
10
Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Auditory Temporal Fine Structure.年龄和听力损失对听觉时间精细结构加工的影响。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:1-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_1.