Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(5):377-387. doi: 10.1159/000523914. Epub 2022 May 30.
This study investigated the objective and subjective benefit of a second cochlear implant (CI) on binaural listening tasks of speech understanding in noise and localization in younger and older adults. We aimed to determine if the aging population can utilize binaural cues and obtain comparable benefits from bilateral CI (BIL_CI) when compared to the younger population.
Twenty-nine adults with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were included. Participants were evaluated in two conditions, better CI (BE_CI) alone and BIL_CI using AzBio and Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentence in noise tests. Localization tasks were completed in the BIL_CI condition using a broadband stimulus, low-frequency stimuli, and high-frequency stimuli. A subjective questionnaire was administered to assess satisfaction with CI.
Older age was significantly associated with poorer performance on AzBio +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and BKB-speech in noise (SIN); however, improvements from BE_CI to BIL_CI were observed across all ages. In the AzBio +5 condition, nearly half of all participants achieved a significant improvement from BE_CI to BIL_CI with the majority of those occurring in patients younger than 65 years of age. Conversely, the majority of participants who achieved a significant improvement in BKB-SIN were adults >65 years of age. Years of BIL_CI experience and time between implants were not associated with performance. For localization, mean absolute error increased with age for low and high narrowband noise, but not for the broadband noise. Response gain was negatively correlated with age for all localization stimuli. Neither BIL_CI listening experience nor time between implants significantly impacted localization ability. Subjectively, participants report reduction in disability with the addition of the second CI. There is no observed relationship between age or speech recognition score and satisfaction with BIL_CI.
Overall performance on binaural listening tasks was poorer in older adults than in younger adults. However, older adults were able to achieve significant benefit from the addition of a second CI, and performance on binaural tasks was not correlated with overall device satisfaction. The significance of the improvement was task and stimulus dependent but suggested a critical limit may exist for optimal performance on SIN tasks for CI users. Specifically, older adults require at least a +8 dB SNR to understand 50% of speech postoperatively; therefore, solely utilizing a fixed +5 dB SNR preoperatively to qualify CI candidates is not recommended as this test condition may introduce limitations in demonstrating CI benefit.
本研究旨在探讨年轻和老年患者在双耳聆听任务中植入第二侧人工耳蜗(CI)对言语理解和定位的客观和主观获益。我们旨在确定老年人群是否能够利用双耳线索,并从双侧 CI(BIL_CI)中获得与年轻人群相当的获益。
本研究纳入了 29 名双侧重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失的成年人。参与者在两种条件下接受评估,即仅使用较好的 CI(BE_CI)和使用 AzBio 和 Bamford-Kowal-Bench(BKB)句子在噪声测试中的 BIL_CI。定位任务在 BIL_CI 条件下使用宽带刺激、低频刺激和高频刺激完成。我们还使用一份主观问卷评估了患者对 CI 的满意度。
年龄较大与 AzBio +5 dB 信噪比(SNR)和 BKB-噪声下言语(SIN)表现较差显著相关;然而,从 BE_CI 到 BIL_CI 的改善在所有年龄组中均有观察到。在 AzBio +5 条件下,几乎所有参与者都从 BE_CI 到 BIL_CI 获得了显著的改善,其中大多数改善发生在年龄小于 65 岁的患者中。相反,在 BKB-SIN 中获得显著改善的大多数参与者是年龄大于 65 岁的成年人。BIL_CI 聆听经验年限和两次植入之间的时间间隔与表现无关。对于定位,对于低频和高频窄带噪声,平均绝对误差随年龄增加而增加,但对于宽带噪声则不然。响应增益与所有定位刺激的年龄呈负相关。BIL_CI 聆听经验或两次植入之间的时间间隔都没有显著影响定位能力。主观上,患者报告随着第二侧 CI 的添加,残疾程度降低。年龄或言语识别得分与对 BIL_CI 的满意度之间没有观察到相关性。
与年轻成年人相比,老年成年人在双耳聆听任务中的表现较差。然而,老年成年人能够从第二侧 CI 的添加中获得显著的获益,并且双耳任务的表现与整体设备满意度无关。改善的意义取决于任务和刺激,但这表明 CI 用户在 SIN 任务上的最佳表现可能存在一个临界限制。具体而言,老年人需要至少 +8 dB SNR 才能在术后理解 50%的言语;因此,仅在术前使用固定的+5 dB SNR 来限定 CI 候选者是不可取的,因为这种测试条件可能会限制对 CI 获益的展示。