Jong Miek C, Boers Inge, Schouten van der Velden Arjan P, Meij Suzan van der, Göker Emine, Timmer-Bonte Anja N J H, van Wietmarschen Herman A
1 Department of Nutrition and Health, Louis Bolk Institute , Bunnik, The Netherlands .
2 Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University , Sundsvall, Sweden .
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(9-10):942-953. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0191.
To compare the effectiveness of yoga added to standard care (SC) versus SC only, in women with breast cancer during chemotherapy.
A multicenter pragmatic, randomized controlled study.
SETTINGS/LOCATION: Three hospitals in the Netherlands.
Women with stage I-III breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.
Women were randomized either to a program based on Dru Yoga, once a week yoga sessions for 12 weeks (N = 47), or SC only (N = 36).
Primary outcome fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory [MFI]; general fatigue) and secondary outcomes fatigue (MFI, Fatigue Quality List [FQL]), quality of life (30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-C of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC-QLQ-C-30]) and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale [HADS], Impact of Events Scale [IES]) were measured at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2) and analyzed on observed cases. Other outcomes were adequate relief, reintegration to work, and adverse events.
No significant differences were found in general fatigue at T1 (MFI: yoga; 14.6 ± 4.5 vs. SC; 14.2 ± 4.2, p = 0.987). Similar findings were observed for other fatigue (sub)scales of MFI and FQL and functional domains of EORTC. With respect to EORTCs symptom scales, women in the yoga group reported significantly less nausea and vomiting compared with SC at T2 (p = 0.004), but not at T1 (p = 0.807). Depressive symptoms were significantly lower with yoga at T1 (HADS: yoga; 4.7 ± 4.1 vs. SC; 5.1 ± 4.2, p = 0.031). More women in the yoga group experienced adequate relief compared with SC at T1 (yoga; 51% vs. SC; 19%) and had returned to work at T2 (yoga; 53% vs. SC; 23%). No adverse events were reported with yoga.
A Dru-based yoga program failed to demonstrate a significant beneficial effect on fatigue. Possible favorable effects of the yoga program on nausea and vomiting and early return to work in breast cancer survivors warrant further research.
比较在接受化疗的乳腺癌女性中,标准护理(SC)基础上加用瑜伽与单纯标准护理的效果。
一项多中心实用随机对照研究。
荷兰的三家医院。
I - III期接受化疗的乳腺癌女性。
女性被随机分为两组,一组参加基于德鲁伊瑜伽的项目,每周进行一次瑜伽课程,共12周(N = 47),另一组仅接受标准护理(N = 36)。
主要观察指标为疲劳(多维疲劳量表[MFI];总体疲劳),次要观察指标包括疲劳(MFI、疲劳质量清单[FQL])、生活质量(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-C30[EORTC-QLQ-C-30])和心理困扰(医院焦虑抑郁量表[HADS]、事件影响量表[IES]),在基线(T0)、3个月(T1)和6个月(T2)时进行测量,并对观察病例进行分析。其他观察指标包括充分缓解、重返工作岗位和不良事件。
在T1时,总体疲劳方面未发现显著差异(MFI:瑜伽组;14.6±4.5 vs. 标准护理组;14.2±4.2,p = 0.987)。在MFI和FQL的其他疲劳(子)量表以及EORTC的功能领域也观察到类似结果。关于EORTC症状量表,瑜伽组女性在T2时报告的恶心和呕吐明显少于标准护理组(p = 0.004),但在T1时无差异(p = 0.807)。在T1时,瑜伽组的抑郁症状明显低于标准护理组(HADS:瑜伽组;4.7±4.1 vs. 标准护理组;5.1±4.2,p = 0.031)。在T1时,与标准护理组相比,瑜伽组有更多女性经历了充分缓解(瑜伽组;51% vs. 标准护理组;19%),并且在T2时已重返工作岗位(瑜伽组;53% vs. 标准护理组;23%)。未报告瑜伽相关的不良事件。
基于德鲁伊瑜伽的项目未能证明对疲劳有显著有益效果。瑜伽项目对乳腺癌幸存者的恶心和呕吐以及早期重返工作岗位可能的有利影响值得进一步研究。