NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Mar;124(3):341-347. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13135. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
The use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) for poisonings with four non-traditionally dialysed toxins (NTDTs) is increasing in the United States. This study evaluated whether ECTRs are prescribed for toxin removal or the treatment of other medical illnesses or complications. We performed a 2-Phase retrospective analysis evaluating the main indication for ECTRs in patients with poisoning from a NTDT (defined for this study as acetaminophen, opioids, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or digoxin) and ECTR. The first phase assessed all cases from a single site (New York City Poison Control Center) between the years 2000 and 2016, and the second phase surveyed all United States Poison Control Centers (PCCs). In Phase 1, demographics, toxin ingested and main indication for ECTR were extracted. In Phase 2, a query to the National Poison Data System using the a pragmatic subset of inclusion criteria from Phase 1 restricted to single toxin ingestions over a narrower time frame (2014-2016) provided the cases for study. A structured online questionnaire was sent to all United States PCCs to request their database review regarding the indication for ECTR for their cases. In Phase 1, 92 cases met inclusion criteria. In Phase 2, 519 cases were screened and 425 met inclusion criteria. In Phase 1 91/92 (98.9%) and Phase 2 411/425 (96.7%), of extracorporeal treatments were used to treat underlying medical conditions or poisoning-related complications rather than accelerate toxin removal. The increasing number of ECTRs reported in patients who ingested one of the four NTDTs thus appears to be for medical indications rather than attempts at toxin removal, a distinction that is important.
在美国,使用体外治疗(ECTR)治疗四种非传统透析毒素(NTDT)中毒的情况越来越多。本研究评估了 ECTR 是否是为了去除毒素还是为了治疗其他医学疾病或并发症而开具的。我们进行了一项 2 期回顾性分析,评估了 NTDT(本研究中定义为对乙酰氨基酚、阿片类药物、三环抗抑郁药(TCAs)或地高辛)和 ECTR 中毒患者使用 ECTR 的主要适应症。第一阶段评估了 2000 年至 2016 年期间来自单一地点(纽约市毒物控制中心)的所有病例,第二阶段调查了所有美国毒物控制中心(PCC)。在第 1 阶段,提取了人口统计学资料、摄入的毒素和 ECTR 的主要适应症。在第 2 阶段,使用来自第 1 阶段的一个实用纳入标准子集,对国家毒物数据系统进行查询,限制在更窄的时间范围内(2014-2016 年),为研究提供病例。向所有美国 PCC 发送了一份结构化的在线问卷,要求他们审查数据库,以了解他们对 ECTR 的使用情况。在第 1 阶段,92 例符合纳入标准。在第 2 阶段,筛选了 519 例,其中 425 例符合纳入标准。在第 1 阶段,92/92(98.9%)和第 2 阶段,411/425(96.7%)的体外治疗用于治疗潜在的医疗条件或与中毒相关的并发症,而不是加速毒素清除。因此,在摄入四种 NTDT 之一的患者中,报告的 ECTR 数量不断增加,似乎是出于医疗适应症,而不是试图去除毒素,这一点很重要。