Suppr超能文献

酶促将一氧化氮还原为笑气的机制——一氧化氮还原酶和细胞色素 c 氧化酶的比较。

Mechanisms for enzymatic reduction of nitric oxide to nitrous oxide - A comparison between nitric oxide reductase and cytochrome c oxidase.

机构信息

Department of Organic Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden.

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018 Nov;1859(11):1223-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.09.368. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

Cytochrome c oxidases (CcO) reduce O to HO in the respiratory chain of mitochondria and many aerobic bacteria. In addition, some species of CcO can also reduce NO to NO and water while others cannot. Here, the mechanism for NO-reduction in CcO is investigated using quantum mechanical calculations. Comparison is made to the corresponding reaction in a "true" cytochrome c-dependent NO reductase (cNOR). The calculations show that in cNOR, where the reduction potentials are low, the toxic NO molecules are rapidly reduced, while the higher reduction potentials in CcO lead to a slower or even impossible reaction, consistent with experimental observations. In both enzymes the reaction is initiated by addition of two NO molecules to the reduced active site, forming a hyponitrite intermediate. In cNOR, NO can then be formed using only the active-site electrons. In contrast, in CcO, one proton-coupled reduction step most likely has to occur before NO can be formed, and furthermore, proton transfer is most likely rate-limiting. This can explain why different CcO species with the same heme a-Cu active site differ with respect to NO reduction efficiency, since they have a varying number and/or properties of proton channels. Finally, the calculations also indicate that a conserved active site valine plays a role in reducing the rate of NO reduction in CcO.

摘要

细胞色素 c 氧化酶(CcO)在线粒体和许多需氧细菌的呼吸链中将 O 还原为 HO。此外,一些 CcO 物种还可以将 NO 还原为 NO 和水,而其他物种则不能。在这里,使用量子力学计算研究了 CcO 中 NO 还原的机制。并与“真正的”细胞色素 c 依赖性一氧化氮还原酶(cNOR)的相应反应进行了比较。计算表明,在 cNOR 中,还原电位较低,有毒的 NO 分子迅速被还原,而 CcO 中的较高还原电位导致反应缓慢甚至不可能,这与实验观察结果一致。在这两种酶中,反应都是通过将两个 NO 分子添加到还原的活性部位开始的,形成亚硝酸盐中间产物。在 cNOR 中,仅使用活性部位的电子就可以形成 NO。相比之下,在 CcO 中,在形成 NO 之前很可能需要进行一个质子偶联的还原步骤,并且质子转移很可能是限速步骤。这可以解释为什么具有相同血红素 a-Cu 活性部位的不同 CcO 物种在 NO 还原效率方面存在差异,因为它们具有不同数量和/或质子通道的特性。最后,计算还表明,保守的活性部位缬氨酸在降低 CcO 中 NO 还原速率方面起着作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验