Suppr超能文献

羟考酮与吗啡对中重度癌痛患者镇痛效果的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine on patients with moderate and advanced cancer pain: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Guo Kai-Kai, Deng Cheng-Qi, Lu Gui-Jun, Zhao Guo-Li

机构信息

Department of Pain Management, The Center of Anaesthetized Operation, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100048, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0583-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morphine and oxycodone are considered as wide-spreadly used opioids for moderate/severe cancer pain. However, debate exists about the evidence regarding their relative tolerability and underlying results.

METHODS

A systematic search of online electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library updated on October 2017 were conducted. The meta-analysis was performed including the studies that were designed as randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

In total, seven randomized clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. No statistical differences in analgesic effect between oxycodone and morphine were observed. Both the pooled analysis of API (MD =0.01, 95% CI -0.22 - 0.23; p = 0.96) and WPI (MD = - 0.05, 95% CI -0.21 - 0.30; p = 0.72) demonstrated clinical non-inferiority of the efficacy of morphine compared with oxycodone, respectively. Additionally, no significant difference in PRR response was observed in either oxycodone or morphine that were used in patients (MD =0.99, 95% CI -0.88 - 1.11; p = 0.87). With the pooled result of AEs indicating the comparable safety profiles between the 2 treatment groups, the meta-analysis on the nausea (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.59; p = 0.22), vomiting (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.75-2.38; p = 0.33), somnolence (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.95-1.93; p = 0.10), diarrhea (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.60-1,67; p = 0.98), and constipation (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.77-1.41; p = 0.79) was conducted, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, no remarkable difference was identified either in analgesic efficacy or in tolerability of oxycodone and morphine as the first-line therapy for patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Thus, no sufficient clinical evidence on the superior effects of oxycodone to morphine was provided in this experimental hypothesis.

摘要

背景

吗啡和羟考酮被认为是广泛用于中度/重度癌痛的阿片类药物。然而,关于它们相对耐受性及潜在结果的证据存在争议。

方法

对在线电子数据库进行系统检索,包括2017年10月更新的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆。纳入设计为随机对照试验的研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

共有7项随机临床试验符合纳入标准。未观察到羟考酮和吗啡在镇痛效果上的统计学差异。API(MD =0.01,95%CI -0.22至0.23;p =0.96)和WPI(MD = -0.05,95%CI -0.21至0.30;p =0.72)的汇总分析分别表明,与羟考酮相比,吗啡疗效在临床上非劣效。此外,在患者使用的羟考酮或吗啡中,PRR反应均未观察到显著差异(MD =0.99,95%CI -0.88至1.11;p =0.87)。AE的汇总结果表明两个治疗组安全性相当,分别对恶心(OR =1.20,95%CI 0.90 - 1.59;p =0.22)、呕吐(OR =1.33,95%CI 0.75 - 2.38;p =0.33)、嗜睡(OR =1.35,95%CI 0.95 - 1.93;p =0.10)、腹泻(OR =1.01,95%CI 0.60 - 1.67;p =0.98)和便秘(OR =1.04,95%CI 0.77 - 1.41;p =0.79)进行了荟萃分析。

结论

在本研究中,对于中度至重度癌痛患者,羟考酮和吗啡作为一线治疗药物,在镇痛效果和耐受性方面均未发现显著差异。因此,本实验假设中未提供足够的临床证据表明羟考酮比吗啡效果更优。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6154420/ed9e95df947d/12871_2018_583_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验