• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变革推动者:建立质量改进合作组织,以提高对澳大利亚痴呆症护理临床指南的依从性。

Agents of change: establishing quality improvement collaboratives to improve adherence to Australian clinical guidelines for dementia care.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 24;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0820-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-018-0820-z
PMID:30249276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6154830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines alone is insufficient to create meaningful change in clinical practice. Quality improvement collaborative models have potential to address the evidence-practice gap in dementia care because they capitalise on known knowledge translation enablers and incorporate optimal approaches to implementation. Non-pharmacological interventions focused on promoting independence are effective and favoured by people with dementia and their carers but are not routinely implemented. The objective of this translational project is to assess the impact of quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) on adherence to non-pharmacological recommendations from the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia.

METHODS

This project will employ an interrupted time-series design with process evaluation to assess the impact, uptake, feasibility, accessibility, cost, and sustainability of the QICs over 18 months. Thirty clinicians from across Australia will be invited to join the QICs to build their capacity in leading innovation in dementia care. Clinicians will participate in a training program and be supported to develop and implement a quality improvement project unique to their service context using plan-do-study-act cycles. Regular online meetings with their peers in the QIC will facilitate benchmarking and problem-solving. Clinicians will describe their practice via monthly checklists, and guideline adherence will be determined against a set of defined criteria. Phone interviews with up to 180 client dyads will be used to assess satisfaction with care and client outcomes. Clinician interviews and field note data will be used to explore implementation and costs. Involvement of people with dementia and carers will be embedded in the study design, conduct, and reporting, in addition to clinical and industry expertise.

DISCUSSION

The quality of dementia care in Australia is largely dependent on the clinician involved and the extent to which they apply best available evidence in their practice. This study will determine the elements of this multifaceted implementation strategy that contributed to guideline adherence and client outcomes. The findings will inform future translational approaches to improving care and outcomes for people with dementia and their carers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 21 February 2018 ( ACTRN12618000268246 ).

摘要

背景

仅传播临床实践指南不足以在临床实践中产生有意义的改变。质量改进合作模式有可能解决痴呆症护理中的证据与实践差距问题,因为它们利用了已知的知识转化促进因素,并纳入了实施的最佳方法。以促进独立性为重点的非药物干预措施是有效的,并且受到痴呆症患者及其照顾者的青睐,但并未常规实施。本转化项目的目的是评估质量改进合作(QIC)对澳大利亚《临床实践指南》中痴呆症非药物建议的依从性的影响。

方法

该项目将采用中断时间序列设计并进行过程评估,以在 18 个月内评估 QIC 的影响、采用情况、可行性、可及性、成本和可持续性。将邀请来自澳大利亚各地的 30 名临床医生参加 QIC,以提高他们在痴呆症护理创新方面的能力。临床医生将参加培训计划,并在同行的支持下,使用计划-执行-研究-行动循环,根据其服务背景制定和实施独特的质量改进项目。定期的 QIC 在线会议将促进基准测试和解决问题。临床医生将通过每月的清单描述他们的实践,并且将根据一套定义的标准确定指南的遵守情况。将对多达 180 对客户对进行电话访谈,以评估对护理的满意度和客户结果。将使用临床医生访谈和实地记录数据来探索实施和成本。除了临床和行业专业知识外,还将在研究设计、实施和报告中嵌入痴呆症患者及其照顾者的参与。

讨论

澳大利亚的痴呆症护理质量在很大程度上取决于参与的临床医生以及他们在实践中应用最佳现有证据的程度。本研究将确定这一多方面实施策略的要素,这些要素有助于指南的遵守和客户的结果。研究结果将为改善痴呆症患者及其照顾者的护理和结果的未来转化方法提供信息。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心于 2018 年 2 月 21 日注册(ACTRN12618000268246)。

相似文献

1
Agents of change: establishing quality improvement collaboratives to improve adherence to Australian clinical guidelines for dementia care.变革推动者:建立质量改进合作组织,以提高对澳大利亚痴呆症护理临床指南的依从性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 24;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0820-z.
2
Improving adherence to guideline recommendations in dementia care through establishing a quality improvement collaborative of agents of change: an interrupted time series study.通过建立变革推动者的质量改进协作组来提高痴呆症护理中对指南建议的依从性:一项中断时间序列研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Sep 24;1:80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00073-x. eCollection 2020.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Post-diagnostic allied health interventions for people with dementia in Australia: a spotlight on current practice.澳大利亚针对痴呆症患者的诊断后联合健康干预措施:当前实践聚焦
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 4;12(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4588-2.
5
Clinician-led improvement in cancer care (CLICC)--testing a multifaceted implementation strategy to increase evidence-based prostate cancer care: phased randomised controlled trial--study protocol.以临床医生为主导的癌症护理改善(CLICC)——测试一种多方面的实施策略,以增加基于证据的前列腺癌护理:分阶段随机对照试验——研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 29;9:64. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-64.
6
How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.质量改进合作如何以及在什么情况下能带来更好的结果?系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 4;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z.
7
Economic evaluation of the NET intervention versus guideline dissemination for management of mild head injury in hospital emergency departments.医院急诊部门轻度头部损伤管理中 NET 干预与指南传播的经济评估。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0834-6.
8
Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to improve the wellbeing of people with dementia and their carers: study protocol for 'Care of People with dementia in their Environments (COPE)' in the Australian context.在澳大利亚背景下实施一项基于证据的干预措施,以改善痴呆症患者及其照顾者的幸福感:“在环境中照顾痴呆症患者(COPE)”研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 9;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0790-7.
9
Evaluating implementation and impact of a provincial quality improvement collaborative for the management of chronic diseases in primary care: the COMPAS+ study protocol.评估省级慢性病管理质量改进合作在基层医疗中的实施和影响:COMPAS+研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1072-y.
10
The development, implementation and evaluation of clinical pathways for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan: protocol for an interrupted times series evaluation.萨斯喀彻温省慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)临床路径的制定、实施与评估:一项中断时间序列评估方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2750-x.

引用本文的文献

1
How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation.一个质量改进协作如何、为何以及在何种情况下能在与痴呆症患者合作的临床医生中建立知识和技能?一项基于现实主义的过程评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147.
2
Improving adherence to guideline recommendations in dementia care through establishing a quality improvement collaborative of agents of change: an interrupted time series study.通过建立变革推动者的质量改进协作组来提高痴呆症护理中对指南建议的依从性:一项中断时间序列研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Sep 24;1:80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00073-x. eCollection 2020.
3
Post-diagnostic allied health interventions for people with dementia in Australia: a spotlight on current practice.澳大利亚针对痴呆症患者的诊断后联合健康干预措施:当前实践聚焦
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 4;12(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4588-2.

本文引用的文献

1
What does the general public understand about prevention and treatment of dementia? A systematic review of population-based surveys.公众对痴呆症的预防和治疗了解多少?基于人群的调查系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0196085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196085. eCollection 2018.
2
An empirical comparison of the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L, DEMQOL-U and DEMQOL-Proxy-U for older people in residential care.在居住护理的老年人中,对 EQ-5D-5L、DEMQOL-U 和 DEMQOL-Proxy-U 的测量属性进行实证比较。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1283-1294. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1777-0. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
4
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
5
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care.痴呆症的预防、干预与护理。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2673-2734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research - an Australian framework.将消费者参与纳入健康与医学研究——澳大利亚框架
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 10;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2.
7
Development and validation of a new instrument measuring guideline adherence in clinical practice.一种用于测量临床实践中指南依从性的新工具的开发与验证。
Fam Pract. 2016 Oct;33(5):562-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw063. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
9
Interventions to delay functional decline in people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews.延缓痴呆症患者功能衰退的干预措施:系统评价的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 27;6(4):e010767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010767.
10
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.