Stahlman W David, McWaters Mercedes, Christian Erica, Knapp Eric, Fritch Andrea, Mailloux Jennifer R
Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA, USA.
Department of Psychological Science, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA, USA.
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:102-105. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
In recent decades there has been great progress in discovering the conditions under which cue competition occurs during animal learning. In humans, however, the evidence remains equivocal regarding the degree to which stimuli compete with one another for behavioral control. We report here the results of a single experiment wherein thirty-nine college students completed a novel cue competition task with visual and tactile stimuli. Participants visually and/or haptically examined a series of novel objects. They were then asked to select the objects with which they had interacted from a larger pool of both novel and familiar objects. Potentiation (or facilitation) by simultaneous visual and haptic inspection was possible. Alternatively, stimulus elements may have competed with one another (i.e., overshadowing), which would present as poorer recognition at test for objects to which participants had simultaneous, dual-modality training exposure. We report the latter effect. We situate these findings in the broader context of associative learning and suggest that our data is relevant to applied settings.
近几十年来,在发现动物学习过程中线索竞争发生的条件方面取得了巨大进展。然而,在人类中,关于刺激物在多大程度上相互竞争以控制行为的证据仍然模棱两可。我们在此报告一项单一实验的结果,其中39名大学生完成了一项使用视觉和触觉刺激的新型线索竞争任务。参与者通过视觉和/或触觉检查了一系列新颖的物体。然后,他们被要求从大量新颖和熟悉的物体中选择他们与之互动过的物体。通过同时进行视觉和触觉检查可能会产生增强(或促进)作用。或者,刺激元素可能会相互竞争(即遮蔽),这将表现为参与者接受过同时的双模态训练的物体在测试中的识别较差。我们报告了后一种效应。我们将这些发现置于联想学习的更广泛背景中,并表明我们的数据与应用环境相关。