Neal Jeremy L, Lowe Nancy K, Phillippi Julia C, Carlson Nicole S, Knupp Amy M, Dietrich Mary S
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
University of Colorado College of Nursing, 13120 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
Hospital admission during early labor may increase women's risk for medical and surgical interventions. However, it is unclear which diagnostic guideline is best suited for identifying the active phase of labor among parous women. Dr. Emanuel Friedman, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) support different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Our aims were (1) to determine the proportions of parous women admitted to the hospital before or in active labor per these leading guidelines and (2) to compare associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor or active labor) with oxytocin augmentation, cesarean birth, and adverse birth outcomes when using the different active labor diagnostic guidelines.
Active labor diagnostic guidelines were applied retrospectively to cervical examination data. Binomial logistic regression was used to assess associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor relative to active labor) and outcomes.
A large, academic, tertiary medical center in the Midwestern United States.
Parous women with spontaneous labor onset who gave birth to a single, cephalic-presenting fetus at term gestation between 2006 and 2010 (n = 3,219).
At admission, 28.8%, 71.9%, and 24.4% of parous women were in active labor per Friedman, NICE, and ACOG/SMFM diagnostic guidelines, respectively. Oxytocin augmentation was more likely among women admitted in early labor, regardless of the diagnostic strategy used (p < 0.001 for each guideline). Cesarean birth was also more likely among women admitted before versus in active labor according to all guidelines (Friedman: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.63 [95% CI 1.46-9.03]), NICE: AOR 2.71 [95% CI 1.47-4.99]), and ACOG/SMFM: AOR 2.11 [95% CI 1.02-4.34]). There were no differences in a composite measure of adverse outcomes within active labor diagnostic guidelines after adjusting for covariates.
Many parous women with spontaneous labor onset are admitted to the hospital before active labor. These women are more likely to receive oxytocin augmentation during labor and are more likely to have a cesarean birth.
Diagnosing active labor prior to admission or prior to intervention aimed at speeding labor after admission may decrease likelihoods for primary cesarean births. The NICE dilation-rate based active labor diagnostic guideline is more inclusive than Friedman or ACOG/SMFM guidelines and its use may be the most clinically-useful for improving the likelihood of vaginal birth among parous women.
产程早期入院可能会增加女性接受医学和外科干预的风险。然而,尚不清楚哪种诊断指南最适合识别经产妇的产程活跃期。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的伊曼纽尔·弗里德曼博士、美国妇产科医师学会/母胎医学协会(ACOG/SMFM)支持不同的产程活跃期诊断指南。我们的目的是:(1)根据这些主要指南确定在产程活跃期之前或期间入院的经产妇比例;(2)比较使用不同的产程活跃期诊断指南时,入院时的产程状态(即产程早期或产程活跃期)与缩宫素加强、剖宫产及不良分娩结局之间的关联。
将产程活跃期诊断指南回顾性应用于宫颈检查数据。采用二项逻辑回归评估入院时的产程状态(即相对于产程活跃期的产程早期)与结局之间的关联。
美国中西部一家大型学术性三级医疗中心。
2006年至2010年间足月妊娠、单胎头先露、自然发动分娩的经产妇(n = 3219)。
入院时,根据弗里德曼、NICE和ACOG/SMFM诊断指南,分别有28.8%、71.9%和24.4%的经产妇处于产程活跃期。无论采用何种诊断策略,产程早期入院的女性更有可能接受缩宫素加强治疗(每种指南均p < 0.001)。根据所有指南,产程早期入院的女性比产程活跃期入院的女性更有可能进行剖宫产(弗里德曼:调整后比值比[AOR] 3.63 [95% CI 1.46 - 9.03]),NICE:AOR 2.71 [95% CI 1.47 - 4.99]),ACOG/SMFM:AOR 2.11 [95% CI 1.02 - 4.34])。在对协变量进行调整后,产程活跃期诊断指南内的不良结局综合指标无差异。
许多自然发动分娩的经产妇在产程活跃期之前入院。这些女性在分娩期间更有可能接受缩宫素加强治疗,也更有可能进行剖宫产。
在入院前或入院后旨在加速产程的干预前诊断产程活跃期,可能会降低首次剖宫产的可能性。基于扩张率的NICE产程活跃期诊断指南比弗里德曼或ACOG/SMFM指南更具包容性,其应用可能对提高经产妇阴道分娩的可能性最具临床实用性。