• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危临产患者分诊护理中的挑战:两种实践模式的比较。

Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore (Dr Breman and Mr Barr); Vanderbilt School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Phillippi); School of Nursing and School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (Dr Tilden); Perinatal Behavioral Health Clinic, Weymouth, Massachusetts (Dr Paul); and Emory University School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Carlson).

出版信息

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2021;35(2):123-131. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000552.

DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000552
PMID:33900241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9083212/
Abstract

Triage and the timing of admission of low-risk pregnant women can affect the use of augmentation, epidural, and cesarean. The purpose of this analysis was to explore these outcomes in a community hospital by the type of provider staffing triage. This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with a term, vertex fetus laboring in a community hospital. Bivariate and multivariable statistics evaluated associations between triage provider type and labor and birth outcomes. Patients in this sample (N = 335) were predominantly White (89.5%), with private insurance (77.0%), and married (71.0%) with no significant differences in these characteristics by triage provider type. Patients admitted by midwives had lower odds of oxytocin augmentation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29-0.87), epidural (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.69), and cesarean birth (aOR = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.14-0.67), compared with those triaged by physicians after controlling for patient characteristics and triage timing. This study provides additional context to midwives as labor triage providers for healthy, low-risk pregnant individuals; however, challenges persisted with measurement. More research is needed on the specific components of care during labor that support low-risk patients to avoid medical interventions and poor outcomes.

摘要

分诊和低危孕妇入院时间的选择会影响催产素、硬膜外麻醉和剖宫产的使用。本分析的目的是通过分诊提供者类型来探讨社区医院的这些结局。这是一项对在社区医院分娩的低危初产妇、足月、头位胎儿的回顾性队列研究。采用双变量和多变量统计方法评估了分诊提供者类型与分娩结局之间的关联。该样本中的患者(N=335)主要为白人(89.5%),有私人保险(77.0%),已婚(71.0%),但这些特征在分诊提供者类型之间没有显著差异。由助产士收治的患者使用催产素催产的可能性较低(调整后的优势比 [aOR] = 0.50,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.29-0.87),硬膜外麻醉(aOR = 0.29,95% CI = 0.12-0.69)和剖宫产(aOR = 0.308,95% CI = 0.14-0.67),而通过医生分诊的患者则没有,这在控制了患者特征和分诊时间后得到了证实。本研究为健康、低危孕妇提供了更多关于助产士作为分娩分诊提供者的背景信息;然而,在测量方面仍存在挑战。需要更多的研究来了解支持低危患者避免医疗干预和不良结局的分娩过程中的具体护理内容。

相似文献

1
Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.低危临产患者分诊护理中的挑战:两种实践模式的比较。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2021;35(2):123-131. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000552.
2
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
4
Associations Among Intrapartum Interventions and Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women with Spontaneous Onset of Labor.低危初产妇自发性临产时产程中干预措施与剖宫产的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):142-148. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12975. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low-risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study.美国医疗中心助产士的存在与低风险初产妇的分娩护理和分娩结局:安全分娩联盟研究。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):475-486. doi: 10.1111/birt.12407. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
6
Variation of intrapartum care and cesarean rates among practitioners attending births of low-risk, nulliparous women.低危初产妇分娩中不同从业者的产时照护和剖宫产率变化。
Birth. 2020 Jun;47(2):227-236. doi: 10.1111/birt.12483. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).产时入院时机及分娩管理对分娩方式的影响:个案管理助产随机对照试验(COSMOS试验)结果
Midwifery. 2013 Dec;29(12):1297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
8
Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.应用主要的活跃产程诊断指南后经产妇剖宫产的可能性。
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.低危医院分娩中助产护理与产科护理的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521.
10
Labor Intervention and Outcomes in Women Who Are Nulliparous and Obese: Comparison of Nurse-Midwife to Obstetrician Intrapartum Care.初产妇肥胖者的分娩干预措施及结局:助产士与产科医生产时护理的比较
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):29-39. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12579. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of hospital admission at first childbirth: A prospective cohort study.初次分娩时的住院时机:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281707. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Severe maternal morbidity surveillance: Monitoring pregnant women at high risk for prolonged hospitalisation and death.严重孕产妇发病率监测:监测高危孕妇以预防长时间住院和死亡。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;34(4):427-439. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12574. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Estimating the Financial Impact of Reducing Primary Cesareans.估算降低初次剖宫产术的财务影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13010. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
3
Clinicians' Perspectives on Admission of Pregnant Women: A Triad.临床医生对孕妇入院的看法:三位一体。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):260-268. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000550.
4
Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low-risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study.美国医疗中心助产士的存在与低风险初产妇的分娩护理和分娩结局:安全分娩联盟研究。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):475-486. doi: 10.1111/birt.12407. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
5
Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low-risk parous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study.美国助产士参与的影响集中在低风险经产妇的分娩护理和结局上:安全分娩联盟研究。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):487-499. doi: 10.1111/birt.12405. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
Safe Passage: Improving the Transition of Care Between Triage and Labor and Delivery.安全通道:改善分诊与分娩之间的护理过渡
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Oct/Dec;27(4):223-228. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000191.
7
Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.应用主要的活跃产程诊断指南后经产妇剖宫产的可能性。
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
8
Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care.产妇使用助产士和使用医师进行产前护理的分娩结果比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jul;63(4):399-409. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12750. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Formulating and Answering High-Impact Causal Questions in Physiologic Childbirth Science: Concepts and Assumptions.在生理性分娩科学中提出并回答具有重大影响的因果问题:概念与假设
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Nov;63(6):721-730. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12868. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.