• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这些收益是否超过成本?三种大型卡车安全技术的社会效益成本分析。

Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Societal benefit-cost analysis of three large truck safety technologies.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Blvd., Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Blvd., Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.013
PMID:30253341
Abstract

Although research has found advanced safety technologies to be effective at preventing large truck crashes, limited empirical data exists regarding their cost effectiveness to the U.S. society. Without these data, carriers are hesitant to adopt costly technologies and government agencies are hesitant to create regulation mandating their use. The objective of this study was to provide scientifically-based estimates of the societal benefits and costs of large truck automatic emergency braking (AEB), lane departure warning (LDW), and video-based onboard safety monitoring (OSM). For each technology, benefit-cost analyses were performed for installing the technology on all large trucks (including retrofitting existing trucks) and for equipping new large trucks only. Sensitivity analyses examined three cost estimates (low, average, high; values technology-specific), two estimates of system efficacy (low and high; values technology-specific), and three discount rates (0%, 3%, 7%) for each technology. Equipping trucks with LDW and video-based OSM systems were found to be cost effective for all combinations of costs, efficacy, and discount rates examined, for both new and existing trucks. Results for AEB and were mixed. Only a $500 AEB system was cost effective when equipping new trucks and retrofitting existing trucks. However, all cost estimates were cost effective with a 28% efficacy rate when only equipping new large trucks. Overall, these data suggested all three technologies can be cost-effective for new large trucks provided the current costs and efficacy rates can be maintained or improved upon.

摘要

尽管研究发现先进的安全技术在防止大型卡车事故方面非常有效,但关于其对美国社会的成本效益的数据有限。没有这些数据,运营商就不愿意采用昂贵的技术,政府机构也不愿意制定强制性使用这些技术的规定。本研究的目的是提供基于科学的大型卡车自动紧急制动(AEB)、车道偏离警告(LDW)和基于视频的车载安全监控(OSM)的社会效益和成本效益的估计。对于每种技术,都对在所有大型卡车(包括改装现有卡车)上安装技术和仅在新大型卡车上安装技术进行了效益成本分析。敏感性分析考察了三种成本估算(低、中、高;特定技术值)、两种系统功效估算(低和高;特定技术值)和三种贴现率(0%、3%和 7%)对于每种技术。对于新的和现有的卡车,为配备 LDW 和基于视频的 OSM 系统的卡车配备这些系统被发现对于检查的所有成本、功效和贴现率组合都是具有成本效益的。AEB 的结果则好坏参半。只有当为新卡车配备 AEB 系统且成本为 500 美元时,才具有成本效益。然而,当仅为新的大型卡车配备 AEB 系统且功效率为 28%时,所有成本估算都具有成本效益。总体而言,这些数据表明,只要能够维持或提高当前的成本和功效水平,这三种技术都可以为新的大型卡车提供成本效益。

相似文献

1
Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Societal benefit-cost analysis of three large truck safety technologies.这些收益是否超过成本?三种大型卡车安全技术的社会效益成本分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
2
Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.正面碰撞预防系统在降低大型卡车实际碰撞率方面的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):284-289. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1893700. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Benefit-cost analysis of lane departure warning and roll stability control in commercial vehicles.商用车车道偏离预警和侧翻稳定性控制的效益成本分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.一些现有车辆避撞技术的网络社会效益和网络私人效益。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Efficacy of roll stability control and lane departure warning systems using carrier-collected data.使用运营商收集的数据评估侧倾稳定性控制系统和车道偏离预警系统的效能。
J Safety Res. 2015 Feb;52:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
6
Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.前方碰撞预警和自动紧急制动对涉及皮卡车的追尾事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(4):293-298. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2176191. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.量产前碰撞和车道偏离预警系统预期的碰撞减少及伤害降低情况比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S109-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619.
8
Forward collision warning system impact.前方碰撞预警系统影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S78-S83. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1490020. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.部分自动化车辆防撞技术的成本效益估算。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
10
Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.在美国单车碰撞事故中,配备车道偏离预警系统的车辆对驾乘人员潜在伤害的降低情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S157-64. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.922684.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of advanced emergency braking systems in drowsy driving-related real-world truck collisions.在与疲劳驾驶相关的真实世界卡车碰撞事故中对先进紧急制动系统的评估。
Sleep. 2025 Jan 13;48(1). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae196.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Systematic review of unintentional injury prevention economic evaluations 2010-2019 and comparison to 1998-2009.
2010-2019 年意外伤害预防经济评价的系统评价及与 1998-2009 年的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105688. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105688. Epub 2020 Sep 9.