Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University Witten-Herdecke (UWH), Ostmerheimerstr. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Institute of Hospital Hygiene, Köln-Merheim, Hospital of the Private University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstr. 22, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct;46(5):1093-1097. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1010-z. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
There are several hints that bacterial colonization might be an often overseen cause of non-union. Modern procedures like PCR have been reported to diagnose bacterial colonization with a high degree of accuracy. While PCR is not ubiquitously available, we hypothesize that biopsies from the non-union site are comparable to PCR results reported in the literature.
Retrospective analysis of microbiological results of biopsies from non-unions (femoral or tibial, history of revision surgery, and/or open fracture) with stable osteosynthesis, no clinical signs of local infection were analysed. CRP and leucocyte count were taken on admission. Multiple tissue samples (soft tissue and bone) were from the non-union (1-4 cm incision). Samples were cultivated for 2 weeks and tested following EUCAST protocols using VITEK 2.
11 tibia- and 7 femur non-union (44 ± 23.9 years), 11 open fractures (1 I°, 6 II°, 4 III° Gustillo Anderson), 0-5 revisions, and 4.1 (± 1.8) tissue samples were taken 8.5 (± 1.7) months after trauma. Cultures were positive in 8/18 (44,4%) (3/18 Propionibacterium acnes, 1/18 S. capitis, and 4/18 S. epidermidis). There was neither a correlation between number of biopsies taken and positive culture results (Pearson R: - 0.0503, R 0.0025), nor between positive culture results and leucocytes counts (Pearson R: - 0.0245, R 0.0006) or CRP concentration (Pearson R: 0.2823, R 0.0797).
The results confirm that the presence of bacteria in cases with no clinical signs of infection is a relevant issue. The prevalence of bacteria reported here is comparable that reported from cohorts tested with PCR or sonication. In most cases, there was only one positive biopsy, raising the question whether a contamination has been detected. Thus, to better understand the problem, it is necessary to gather more knowledge regarding the sensitivities and specificities of the different diagnostic procedures.
有一些迹象表明,细菌定植可能是导致骨不连的一个经常被忽视的原因。聚合酶链反应(PCR)等现代方法已被报道可高度准确地诊断细菌定植。虽然 PCR 并非无处不在,但我们假设骨不连部位的活检与文献中报告的 PCR 结果具有可比性。
回顾性分析了稳定内固定、无局部感染临床症状的骨不连(股骨或胫骨,有翻修手术史和/或开放性骨折)患者的活检微生物学结果。入院时检测 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数。从骨不连部位(1-4 cm 切口)取多个组织样本(软组织和骨)。将样本培养 2 周,按照 EUCAST 方案使用 VITEK 2 进行检测。
共纳入 11 例胫骨和 7 例股骨骨不连(44 ± 23.9 岁)、11 例开放性骨折(1 型 1 例、6 型 2 例、4 型 3 例 Gustillo-Anderson)、0-5 次翻修,创伤后 8.5(± 1.7)个月取 4.1(± 1.8)个组织样本。18 例中有 8 例(44%)培养阳性(3 例痤疮丙酸杆菌、1 例头状葡萄球菌和 4 例表皮葡萄球菌)。活检阳性与活检次数之间(皮尔逊 R:-0.0503,R 0.0025)或与白细胞计数(皮尔逊 R:-0.0245,R 0.0006)或 CRP 浓度(皮尔逊 R:0.2823,R 0.0797)之间均无相关性。
研究结果证实,在无感染临床症状的情况下,细菌的存在是一个相关问题。这里报告的细菌发生率与使用 PCR 或超声检查的队列报告的发生率相当。在大多数情况下,只有一次活检呈阳性,这引发了一个疑问,即是否检测到了污染。因此,为了更好地了解这个问题,有必要更多地了解不同诊断程序的敏感性和特异性。