Suppr超能文献

检测差异甲基化区域的新方法与现有方法的比较。

Comparison of novel and existing methods for detecting differentially methylated regions.

作者信息

Lent Samantha, Xu Hanfei, Wang Lan, Wang Zhe, Sarnowski Chloé, Hivert Marie-France, Dupuis Josée

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, 44 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

BMC Genet. 2018 Sep 17;19(Suppl 1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0637-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-probe analyses in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have identified associations between DNA methylation and many phenotypes, but do not take into account information from neighboring probes. Methods to detect differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (clusters of neighboring probes associated with a phenotype) may provide more power to detect associations between DNA methylation and diseases or phenotypes of interest.

RESULTS

We proposed a novel approach, GlobalP, and perform comparisons with 3 methods-DMRcate, Bumphunter, and comb-p-to identify DMRs associated with log triglycerides (TGs) in real GAW20 data before and after fenofibrate treatment. We applied these methods to the summary statistics from an EWAS performed on the methylation data. Comb-p, DMRcate, and GlobalP detected very similar DMRs near the gene CPT1A on chromosome 11 in both the pre- and posttreatment data. In addition, GlobalP detected 2 DMRs before fenofibrate treatment in the genes ETV6 and ABCG1. Bumphunter identified several DMRs on chromosomes 1 and 20, which did not overlap with DMRs detected by other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel method detected the same DMR identified by two existing methods and detected two additional DMRs not identified by any of the existing methods we compared.

摘要

背景

在全表观基因组关联研究(EWAS)中,单探针分析已确定了DNA甲基化与许多表型之间的关联,但未考虑相邻探针的信息。检测差异甲基化区域(DMR,即与某一表型相关的相邻探针簇)的方法可能会为检测DNA甲基化与感兴趣的疾病或表型之间的关联提供更强的效力。

结果

我们提出了一种新方法GlobalP,并与DMRcate、Bumphunter和comb-p这三种方法进行比较,以在非诺贝特治疗前后的真实GAW20数据中识别与对数甘油三酯(TG)相关的DMR。我们将这些方法应用于对甲基化数据进行的EWAS汇总统计。Comb-p、DMRcate和GlobalP在治疗前和治疗后的数据分析中均在11号染色体上的CPT1A基因附近检测到了非常相似的DMR。此外,GlobalP在非诺贝特治疗前在ETV6和ABCG1基因中检测到了2个DMR。Bumphunter在1号和20号染色体上识别出了几个DMR,这些DMR与其他方法检测到的DMR不重叠。

结论

我们的新方法检测到了两种现有方法所识别的相同DMR,并且还检测到了我们所比较的任何现有方法均未识别出的另外两个DMR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c97/6156895/87aba8dd8c5a/12863_2018_637_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验