• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的ATOM分类:单机构经验分析

ATOM Classification of Bile Duct Injuries During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Analysis of a Single Institution Experience.

作者信息

Balla Andrea, Quaresima Silvia, Corona Mario, Lucatelli Pierleone, Fiocca Fausto, Rossi Massimo, Bezzi Mario, Catalano Carlo, Salvatori Filippo M, Fingerhut Abe, Paganini Alessandro M

机构信息

1 Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini," Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy .

2 Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):206-212. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0413. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2018.0413
PMID:30256167
Abstract

PURPOSE

Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are more frequent during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Several BDI classifications are reported, but none encompasses anatomy of damage and vascular injury (A), timing of detection (To), and mechanism of damage (M). Aim was to apply the ATOM classification to a series of patients referred for BDI management after LC.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2016, 26 patients (16 males and 10 females, median age 63 years, range 34-82 years) with BDIs were observed. Fifteen patients were managed by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC)+endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); five and six underwent PTC and ERCP alone, respectively. Median overall follow-up duration was 34 months. Three patients died from sepsis.

RESULTS

Out of 26 patients, 20 presented with main bile duct and six with nonmain bile duct injuries. Using the ATOM classification, every aspect of the BDI in every case was included, unlike with other classifications (Neuhaus, Lau, Strasberg, Bergman, and Hanover).

CONCLUSIONS

The all-inclusive European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) classification contains objective data and emphasizes the underlying mechanisms of damage, which is relevant for prevention. It also integrates vascular injury, necessary for ultimate management, and timing of discovery, which has diagnostic implications. The management complexity of these patients requires specialized referral centers.

摘要

目的

胆管损伤(BDI)在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中更为常见。已有多种BDI分类方法被报道,但均未涵盖损伤的解剖结构和血管损伤(A)、发现时间(To)以及损伤机制(M)。本研究旨在将ATOM分类应用于一系列因LC术后BDI而转诊进行治疗的患者。

方法

2008年至2016年,观察了26例胆管损伤患者(男性16例,女性10例,中位年龄63岁,范围34 - 82岁)。15例患者接受了经皮经肝胆管造影(PTC)+内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗;5例和6例患者分别单独接受了PTC和ERCP治疗。中位总随访时间为34个月。3例患者死于败血症。

结果

26例患者中,20例为主要胆管损伤,6例为非主要胆管损伤。与其他分类方法(Neuhaus、Lau、Strasberg、Bergman和Hanover)不同,使用ATOM分类法涵盖了每个病例中BDI的各个方面。

结论

全面的欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)分类包含客观数据,并强调损伤的潜在机制,这对预防具有重要意义。它还整合了最终治疗所必需的血管损伤以及具有诊断意义的发现时间。这些患者的治疗复杂性需要专门的转诊中心。

相似文献

1
ATOM Classification of Bile Duct Injuries During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Analysis of a Single Institution Experience.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的ATOM分类:单机构经验分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):206-212. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0413. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Sep;89(9):1523-7.
3
Postcholecystectomy bile duct injuries: evolution of surgical treatment.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤:外科治疗的演变
Pol Przegl Chir. 2019 Jan 3;91(1):14-21. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7810.
4
A retrospective analysis of bile duct injuries treated in a tertiary center: the utility of a universal classification-the ATOM classification.三级中心治疗胆管损伤的回顾性分析:通用分类法——ATOM分类法的效用
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):347-357. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09497-z. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Isolated right segmental hepatic duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后孤立性右肝段胆管损伤
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005 Mar-Apr;28(2):185-95. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-2678-5.
6
Management of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后主要胆管损伤的处理
Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1196-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9246-y. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
7
Iatrogenic common bile duct injuries: Increasing complexity in the laparoscopic era: A prospective cohort study.医源性胆总管损伤:腹腔镜时代的复杂性日益增加:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Treatment of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: endoscopic and surgical management.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆总管损伤的治疗:内镜及手术处理
World J Surg. 2001 Oct;25(10):1346-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0121-5.
9
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间的胆管损伤。
Can J Surg. 1993 Dec;36(6):509-16.
10
Clinical presentation, management and outcomes of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 15-year single-center experience in Vietnam.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤的临床表现、处理及结局:越南一家中心15年的经验
Front Surg. 2023 Oct 11;10:1280383. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1280383. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.关于在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用人工智能识别解剖结构的系统评价:迈向未来的工具。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 18;410(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6.
2
It's time for a minimum synoptic operation template in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者最小手术模板的时机:系统评价。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Mar 17;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5.
3
Routine near infra-red indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched comparison.
常规近红外吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影与腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间的术中胆管造影:病例匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1959-1967. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06970-0. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
Post-cholecystectomy acute injury: What can go wrong?胆囊切除术后急性损伤:可能会出现什么问题?
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 May;23(2):138-144. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.2.138. Epub 2019 May 31.