E. Ng is an MD-PhD graduate, Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-8391. A.A. Jones is an MD-PhD candidate, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. M. Sivapragasam is an MD-MSc candidate, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. S. Nath is an MD-PhD candidate, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. L.E. Mak is an MD-PhD candidate, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. N.D. Rosenblum is professor, Departments of Pediatrics, Physiology, Laboratory Medicine, and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Med. 2019 May;94(5):664-670. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002467.
For over 60 years, MD-PhD programs have provided integrated clinical and research training to produce graduates primed for physician-scientist careers. Yet the nature of this integrated training is poorly characterized, with no program theory of MD-PhD training to guide program development or evaluation. The authors address this gap by proposing a program theory of integrated MD-PhD training applying constructs from cognitive psychology and medical education. The authors argue that integrated physician-scientist training requires development of at least three elements in trainees: cognitive synergy, sense of self, and professional capacity. First, integrated programs need to foster the cognitive ability to synergize and transfer knowledge between the clinical and research realms. Second, integrated programs need to facilitate development of a unique and emergent identity as a physician-scientist that is more than the sum of the individual roles of physician and scientist. Third, integrated programs should develop core competencies unique to physician-scientists in addition to those required of each independently. The authors describe how programs can promote development of these elements in trainees, summarized in a logic model. Activities and process measures are provided to assist institutions in enhancing integration. Specifically, programs can enact the proposed theory by providing tailored MD-PhD curricula, personal development planning, and a supportive community of practice. It is high time to establish a theory behind integrated MD-PhD training as the basis for designing interventions and evaluations to develop the foundations of physician-scientist expertise.
六十多年来,医学博士(MD-PhD)项目为培养医生科学家提供了临床与科研的综合培训。然而,这种综合培训的性质还没有被很好地描述,也没有 MD-PhD 培训的课程理论来指导项目的开发或评估。为了解决这一差距,作者提出了一个综合 MD-PhD 培训的课程理论,该理论应用了认知心理学和医学教育的概念。作者认为,综合的医生科学家培训需要培养学员至少三个方面的能力:认知协同作用、自我意识和专业能力。首先,综合项目需要培养在临床和研究领域之间协同作用和转移知识的认知能力。其次,综合项目需要促进作为医生科学家的独特和新兴身份的发展,这种身份不仅仅是医生和科学家两个角色的总和。第三,综合项目应该在医生科学家独有的核心能力方面进行发展,而不仅仅是每个独立角色所需要的能力。作者描述了项目如何促进学员这些方面的发展,并在逻辑模型中进行了总结。还提供了活动和过程性指标,以帮助机构加强整合。具体来说,项目可以通过提供定制的 MD-PhD 课程、个人发展规划和支持性实践社区来实施这一理论。现在是时候建立一个综合的 MD-PhD 培训理论,作为设计干预措施和评估的基础,以培养医生科学家专业知识的基础了。