Suppr超能文献

八年制医学课程中实时计算机交互(RTCi)与基于问题的自我导向学习(OSBC)教学方法的比较:一项随机对照教育研究

RTCi versus OSBC teaching method in eight-year medical program: a randomized, controlled educational research.

作者信息

Wang Lu, Zhao Ben, Wang Xiaohui, Guo Minghao, Wang Lu, Dou Lei, Sun Yinan

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

The Center for Biomedical Research, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07641-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Under the standardized educational research model, a multicentre, randomized controlled educational research was conducted to compare the efficacy of the research, teaching and clinical integration (RTCi) and organ system-based curriculum (OSBC) teaching methods in the eight-year medical program.

METHODS

A total of 230 eight-year medical program participants from two clinical colleges signed informed consent for educational research, were randomly divided into the RTCi teaching group (N = 115) and the OSBC teaching group (N = 115) and underwent a one-year study under different teaching methods. The two groups were compared in terms of on-schedule graduation, the number of papers published per student, grade-weighted scores and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores.

RESULTS

The 230 participants were randomly divided into two groups. After one year of RTCi or OSBC teaching, the on-schedule graduation rate of the RTCi group was significantly higher than that of the OSBC group (90% vs. 70%, P = 0.006). The average number of papers published per student in the RTCi group was significantly greater than that in the OSBC group (1.3 vs. 0.7, P = 0.017). The study score of the RTCi group was greater than that of the OSBC group (85.6 vs. 85.2, P = 0.183), although the difference was not statistically significant. The OSCE score of the RTCi group was significantly greater than that of the OSBC group (93 vs. 90, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

In the multicentre randomized controlled teaching study, compared with the OSBC teaching method, the RTCi teaching method significantly improved the on-schedule graduation rate, the number of published papers and the OSCE scores of participants. In terms of study scores, the RTCi teaching method outperformed the OSBC method, with no statistically significant difference. The RTCi teaching method is more conducive to the training and comprehensive development of eight-year medical program participants. In practice, medical education institutions could consider adopting the RTCi teaching method to enhance educational outcomes. Future research should further explore its long-term impact on the career development of medical graduates to strengthen its applicability and sustainability in eight-year medical program.

摘要

背景

在标准化教育研究模式下,开展了一项多中心随机对照教育研究,以比较研究、教学与临床整合(RTCi)和基于器官系统的课程(OSBC)教学方法在八年制医学项目中的效果。

方法

来自两所临床学院的230名八年制医学项目参与者签署了教育研究知情同意书,被随机分为RTCi教学组(N = 115)和OSBC教学组(N = 115),并在不同教学方法下进行了为期一年的研究。比较两组的按时毕业率、每名学生发表的论文数量、成绩加权分数和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)分数。

结果

230名参与者被随机分为两组。经过一年的RTCi或OSBC教学后,RTCi组的按时毕业率显著高于OSBC组(90%对70%,P = 0.006)。RTCi组每名学生发表的论文平均数量显著多于OSBC组(1.3对0.7,P = 0.017)。RTCi组的学习成绩高于OSBC组(85.6对85.2,P = 0.183),尽管差异无统计学意义。RTCi组的OSCE分数显著高于OSBC组(93对90,P = 0.029)。

结论

在多中心随机对照教学研究中,与OSBC教学方法相比,RTCi教学方法显著提高了参与者的按时毕业率、发表论文数量和OSCE分数。在学习成绩方面,RTCi教学方法优于OSBC方法,差异无统计学意义。RTCi教学方法更有利于八年制医学项目参与者的培养和全面发展。在实践中,医学教育机构可考虑采用RTCi教学方法来提高教育效果。未来的研究应进一步探索其对医学毕业生职业发展的长期影响,以增强其在八年制医学项目中的适用性和可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b0/12275267/9801acbc9f0e/12909_2025_7641_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验