• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦一项针对生育年龄妇女的前瞻性全国队列研究:当代激素避孕与卵巢癌的关联。

Association between contemporary hormonal contraception and ovarian cancer in women of reproductive age in Denmark: prospective, nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.

Medical Statistics Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Sep 26;362:k3609. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3609.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.k3609
PMID:30257920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283376/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives (including progestogen types in combined preparations and all progestogen-only products) and overall and specific types of ovarian cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective, nationwide cohort study.

SETTING

Denmark, 1995-2014.

PARTICIPANTS

All women aged 15-49 years during 1995-2014 were eligible. Women were excluded if they immigrated after 1995, had cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), had venous thrombosis, or were treated for infertility before entry (final study population included 1 879 227 women). Women were categorised as never users (no record of being dispensed hormonal contraception), current or recent users (≤1 year after stopping use), or former users (>1 year after stopping use) of different hormonal contraceptives.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Poisson regression was used to calculate relative risk of ovarian cancer among users of any contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives and by progestogen type in combined preparations and all progestogen-only products, including non-oral preparations. Separate analyses examined women followed up to their first contraception type switch and those with full contraceptive histories. Duration, time since last use, and tumour histology were examined and the population prevented fraction were calculated.

RESULTS

During 21.4 million person years, 1249 incident ovarian cancers occurred. Among ever users of hormonal contraception, 478 ovarian cancers were recorded over 13 344 531 person years. Never users had 771 ovarian cancers during 8 150 250 person years. Compared with never users, reduced risks of ovarian cancer occurred with current or recent use and former use of any hormonal contraception (relative risk 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.68) and 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91), respectively). Relative risks among current or recent users decreased with increasing duration (from 0.82 (0.59 to 1.12) with ≤1 year use to 0.26 (0.16 to 0.43) with >10 years' use; P<0.001 for trend). Similar results were achieved among women followed up to their first switch in contraceptive type. Little evidence of major differences in risk estimates by tumour type or progestogen content of combined oral contraceptives was seen. Use of progestogen-only products were not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Among ever users of hormonal contraception, the reduction in the age standardised absolute rate of ovarian cancer was 3.2 per 100 000 person years. Based on the relative risk for the never use versus ever use categories of hormonal contraception (0.66), the population prevented fraction was estimated to be 21%-that is, use of hormonal contraception prevented 21% of ovarian cancers in the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of contemporary combined hormonal contraceptives is associated with a reduction in ovarian cancer risk in women of reproductive age-an effect related to duration of use, which diminishes after stopping use. These data suggest no protective effect from progestogen-only products.

摘要

目的

探讨当代复方激素避孕药(包括复方制剂中的孕激素类型和所有孕激素单一制剂)与卵巢癌总体及特定类型的相关性。

设计

前瞻性、全国性队列研究。

地点

丹麦,1995-2014 年。

参与者

所有在 1995-2014 年期间年龄在 15-49 岁的女性均符合条件。如果她们在 1995 年后移民、患有癌症(除非黑色素瘤皮肤癌外)、有静脉血栓或在入组前接受过不孕症治疗(最终研究人群包括 1879227 名女性),则将其排除在外。女性分为从未使用者(无激素避孕药配药记录)、当前或近期使用者(停药后 1 年内)或以前使用者(停药后 1 年以上)。使用不同的激素避孕药进行分析。

主要观察指标

使用泊松回归计算在使用任何当代复方激素避孕药以及在复方制剂和所有孕激素单一制剂(包括非口服制剂)中使用孕激素类型的情况下,卵巢癌的相对风险。单独的分析检查了随访至首次避孕类型转换的女性和具有完整避孕史的女性。检查了持续时间、停药后时间和肿瘤组织学,并计算了人群预防分数。

结果

在 2140 万个人年中,发生了 1249 例卵巢癌事件。在激素避孕药的既往使用者中,在 13344511 个人年中记录了 478 例卵巢癌。从未使用者在 8150250 个人年中发生了 771 例卵巢癌。与从未使用者相比,当前或近期使用和以前使用任何激素避孕药均可降低卵巢癌的风险(相对风险分别为 0.58(95%置信区间 0.49 至 0.68)和 0.77(0.66 至 0.91))。当前或近期使用者的相对风险随着持续时间的增加而降低(从 1 年内使用的 0.82(0.59 至 1.12)降至 10 年以上使用的 0.26(0.16 至 0.43);P<0.001 趋势)。在随访至首次避孕类型转换的女性中也获得了类似的结果。关于肿瘤类型或复方口服避孕药孕激素含量的风险估计值,没有明显的差异。孕激素单一制剂的使用与卵巢癌风险无关。在激素避孕药的既往使用者中,卵巢癌年龄标准化绝对发生率降低了 3.2/100000 人年。基于从未使用与激素避孕药既往使用类别的相对风险(0.66),估计人群预防分数为 21%-也就是说,激素避孕药的使用在研究人群中预防了 21%的卵巢癌。

结论

在生育年龄的妇女中,使用当代复方激素避孕药与降低卵巢癌风险相关-这种效果与使用时间有关,停药后使用时间减少。这些数据表明孕激素单一制剂没有保护作用。

相似文献

1
Association between contemporary hormonal contraception and ovarian cancer in women of reproductive age in Denmark: prospective, nationwide cohort study.丹麦一项针对生育年龄妇女的前瞻性全国队列研究:当代激素避孕与卵巢癌的关联。
BMJ. 2018 Sep 26;362:k3609. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3609.
2
Contemporary hormonal contraception and risk of endometrial cancer in women younger than age 50: A retrospective cohort study of Danish women.当代激素避孕与 50 岁以下女性子宫内膜癌风险:一项丹麦女性的回顾性队列研究。
Contraception. 2020 Sep;102(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Hormonal contraceptive use and risk of pancreatic cancer-A cohort study among premenopausal women.激素避孕与胰腺癌风险——一项针对绝经前女性的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 30;13(10):e0206358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206358. eCollection 2018.
4
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer.当代激素避孕与乳腺癌风险。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2228-2239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732.
5
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10.非口服激素类避孕药使用者的静脉血栓形成:随访研究,丹麦,2001-2010 年。
BMJ. 2012 May 10;344:e2990. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2990.
6
Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study.激素避孕与静脉血栓栓塞风险:全国性随访研究
BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b2890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2890.
7
Association of Hormonal Contraception With Depression.激素避孕与抑郁的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1154-1162. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2387.
8
Mortality among oral contraceptive users: 20 year follow up of women in a cohort study.口服避孕药使用者的死亡率:队列研究中女性的20年随访
BMJ. 1989 Dec 16;299(6714):1487-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6714.1487.
9
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌与激素避孕药:进一步结果。乳腺癌激素因素协作组
Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3 Suppl):1S-106S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0.
10
Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.终生癌症风险与口服避孕药:皇家全科医生学院口服避孕药研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):580.e1-580.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of oral contraceptive consumption timing on substrate metabolism, cognition, and exercise performance in females: a randomised controlled trial.口服避孕药服用时间对女性底物代谢、认知及运动表现的影响:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05733-1.
2
Unraveling the controversy: exploring the link between sex hormones and skin cancers through a meta-analysis and systematic review.揭开争议:通过荟萃分析和系统评价探索性激素与皮肤癌之间的联系。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 18;317(1):292. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03791-7.
3
Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review.评估避孕措施对育龄妇女患生殖系统癌症风险的影响——一项系统综述
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Nov 13;5:1487820. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1487820. eCollection 2024.
4
Estrogens and breast cancer.雌激素与乳腺癌
Ann Oncol. 2025 Feb;36(2):134-148. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.10.824. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
5
Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Pathologies to Clinical Relevance.子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌:从分子病理学至临床相关性
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 13;25(8):4306. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084306.
6
Prognostic Factors Influencing Survival in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.影响卵巢癌患者生存的预后因素:一项10年回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 5;15(24):5710. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245710.
7
Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions.针对早发性子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌病的靶向、新进化导向的二级预防建议。第二部分:医学干预。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):18-34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead206.
8
Incessant ovulation: a review of its importance in predicting cancer risk.持续排卵:关于其在预测癌症风险中重要性的综述
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 6;13:1240309. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240309. eCollection 2023.
9
Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference.卵巢癌证据审查会议执行摘要。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):179-195. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005211. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
Reevaluating the Role of Progesterone in Ovarian Cancer: Is Progesterone Always Protective?重新评估孕激素在卵巢癌中的作用:孕激素总是保护性的吗?
Endocr Rev. 2023 Nov 9;44(6):1029-1046. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad018.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer.当代激素避孕与乳腺癌风险。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2228-2239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732.
2
Current Gaps in Ovarian Cancer Epidemiology: The Need for New Population-Based Research.卵巢癌流行病学的当前差距:开展新的基于人群研究的必要性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Oct 1;109(10). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx144.
3
A prospective cohort study of oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer among women in the United States born from 1947 to 1964.一项针对1947年至1964年出生的美国女性口服避孕药使用情况与卵巢癌关系的前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 May;28(5):371-383. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0876-0. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
4
Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.终生癌症风险与口服避孕药:皇家全科医生学院口服避孕药研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):580.e1-580.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
5
A prospective study of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use in relation to ovarian cancer risk among Black women.一项关于黑人女性生殖因素和外源性激素使用与卵巢癌风险关系的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 May;28(5):385-391. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0840-4. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Global trends and predictions in ovarian cancer mortality.全球卵巢癌死亡率的趋势和预测。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2017-2025. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw306. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
7
Reproductive factors and ovarian cancer risk in African-American women.非洲裔美国女性的生殖因素与卵巢癌风险
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):654-62. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Ovarian and tubal cancer in Denmark: an update on incidence and survival.丹麦的卵巢癌和输卵管癌:发病率与生存率最新情况
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Oct;95(10):1181-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12948. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
9
Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Subtype: An Analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium.按组织学亚型分类的卵巢癌风险因素:来自卵巢癌队列联盟的分析
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2888-98. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8178. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统的使用对卵巢和输卵管癌症风险的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1281-1284. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1175660. Epub 2016 May 5.