• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究人员流动的多尺度影响。

Multiscale impact of researcher mobility.

机构信息

Ernest and Julio Gallo Management Program, Management of Complex Systems Department, School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2018 Sep 26;15(146):20180580. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0580.

DOI:10.1098/rsif.2018.0580
PMID:30257927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6170771/
Abstract

International mobility facilitates the exchange of scientific, institutional and cultural knowledge. Yet whether globalization and advances in virtual communication technologies have altered the impact of researcher mobility is a relevant and open question that we address by analysing a broad international set of 26 170 physicists from 1980 to 2009, focusing on the 10-year period centred around each mobility event to assess the impact of mobility on research outcomes. We account for secular globalization trends by splitting the analysis into three periods, measuring for each period the effect of mobility on researchers' citation impact, research topic diversity, collaboration networks and geographical coordination. In order to identify causal effects we leverage statistical matching methods that pair mobile researchers with non-mobile researchers that are similar in research profile attributes prior the mobility event. We find that mobile researchers gain up to a 17% increase in citations relative to their non-mobile counterparts, which can be explained by the simultaneous increase in their diversity of co-authors, topics and geographical coordination in the period immediately following migration. Nevertheless, we also observe that researcher's completely curtail prior collaborations with their source country in 11% of the cross-border mobility events. As such, these individual-level perturbations fuel multiscale churning in scientific networks, e.g. rewiring the connectivity of individuals and ideas and affecting international integration. Together these results provide additional clarity on the complex relationship between human capital mobility and the dynamics of social capital investment, with implications for immigration and national innovation system policy.

摘要

国际流动促进了科学、机构和文化知识的交流。然而,全球化和虚拟通信技术的进步是否改变了研究人员流动的影响,这是一个相关的开放性问题,我们通过分析一组来自 1980 年至 2009 年的 26170 名物理学家的广泛国际数据集来解决这个问题,重点关注每个流动事件前后的 10 年时间,以评估流动对研究成果的影响。我们通过将分析分为三个时期来考虑长期的全球化趋势,为每个时期衡量流动对研究人员引用影响力、研究主题多样性、合作网络和地理协调的影响。为了识别因果效应,我们利用统计匹配方法,在流动事件之前,根据研究概况属性,将流动研究人员与非流动研究人员进行配对。我们发现,流动研究人员的引用量相对于非流动研究人员增加了 17%,这可以解释为他们在迁移后的时期内,合著者、主题和地理协调的多样性同时增加。然而,我们也观察到,在 11%的跨境流动事件中,研究人员完全终止了与原籍国的先前合作。因此,这些个体层面的干扰推动了科学网络的多尺度混乱,例如重新连接个人和思想的连接性,并影响了国际融合。这些结果共同为人力资本流动与社会资本投资动态之间的复杂关系提供了更多的明确性,对移民和国家创新系统政策具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/6836ed23f980/rsif20180580-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/1c1f38fc5eaf/rsif20180580-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/cd27810d4e5c/rsif20180580-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/d706298271b5/rsif20180580-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/6836ed23f980/rsif20180580-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/1c1f38fc5eaf/rsif20180580-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/cd27810d4e5c/rsif20180580-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/d706298271b5/rsif20180580-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91a/6170771/6836ed23f980/rsif20180580-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Multiscale impact of researcher mobility.研究人员流动的多尺度影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Sep 26;15(146):20180580. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0580.
2
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent.生物医药专业化的科学回报是巨大且持久的。
BMC Biol. 2022 Sep 30;20(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01400-5.
5
Dataset on researcher's mobility by utilising bibliometric data: Case of Finland-based scholars for the duration of 2008-2018.利用文献计量数据得出的关于研究人员流动性的数据集:以2008 - 2018年期间芬兰学者为例。
Data Brief. 2021 Jan 16;34:106764. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106764. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science.世界引文和合作网络:揭示地理在科学中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:902. doi: 10.1038/srep00902. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
7
High-skilled labour mobility in Europe before and after the 2004 enlargement.2004年欧盟扩大前后欧洲高技能劳动力的流动情况。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Mar;14(128). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0030.
8
Characterizing interdisciplinarity of researchers and research topics using web search engines.利用网络搜索引擎刻画研究人员和研究主题的跨学科性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038747. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
9
The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.哥伦比亚科学界精英——科学图谱绘制与使用综合引文指标与诺贝尔奖得主的比较
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269116. eCollection 2022.
10
Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers.当研究人员在开放获取和国际合作中发表论文时,其科学影响力会增加:基于与贫困相关疾病论文的文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203156. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
A bibliometric analysis using a newly developed model and a customizable research tool: A case study of researcher mobility in Sweden.使用新开发模型和可定制研究工具的文献计量分析:瑞典研究人员流动情况的案例研究
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0308147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308147. eCollection 2024.
2
China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together.中美两国在开展合作时能产出更具影响力的人工智能研究成果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79863-5.
3
Unsupervised embedding of trajectories captures the latent structure of scientific migration.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-disciplinary evolution of the genomics revolution.基因组学革命的跨学科演进。
Sci Adv. 2018 Aug 15;4(8):eaat4211. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4211. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
A data-driven computational model on the effects of immigration policies.基于数据的移民政策影响计算模型
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 21;115(34):E7914-E7923. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800373115. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants.精英生命科学家的流动性:职业和个人决定因素。
无监督轨迹嵌入捕获了科学移民的潜在结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 26;120(52):e2305414120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305414120. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
Continued collaboration shortens the transition period of scientists who move to another institution.持续的合作缩短了转至另一机构的科学家的过渡期。
Scientometrics. 2023;128(3):1765-1784. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04617-x. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
Reproducing scientists' mobility: a data-driven model.再现科学家的流动性:一个数据驱动的模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90281-9.
6
Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact.再探科学精英:生产力、合作、署名及影响力模式
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Apr;17(165):20200135. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0135. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics.科学家在研究主题之间转换的趋势不断增加。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 31;10(1):3439. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11401-8.
Res Policy. 2017 Apr;46(3):573-590. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory.规范教职员工生产力轨迹的误导性叙述。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):E9216-E9223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702121114. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
5
Scientists have most impact when they're free to move.科学家在能够自由行动时影响力最大。
Nature. 2017 Oct 4;550(7674):29-31. doi: 10.1038/550029a.
6
Quantifying the negative impact of brain drain on the integration of European science.量化人才流失对欧洲科学融合的负面影响。
Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 12;3(4):e1602232. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602232. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
High-skilled labour mobility in Europe before and after the 2004 enlargement.2004年欧盟扩大前后欧洲高技能劳动力的流动情况。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Mar;14(128). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0030.
8
Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers.量化弱关系、强关系和超级关系在科学职业生涯中的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):E4671-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501444112. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
The future of the postdoc.博士后的未来。
Nature. 2015 Apr 9;520(7546):144-7. doi: 10.1038/520144a.
10
Reputation and impact in academic careers.学术生涯中的声誉与影响力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15316-21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323111111. Epub 2014 Oct 6.