Suppr超能文献

富含大麻二酚(CBD)的提取物相较于纯化CBD在难治性癫痫治疗中的潜在临床益处:观察性数据荟萃分析

Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pamplona Fabricio A, da Silva Lorenzo Rolim, Coan Ana Carolina

机构信息

Entourage Phytolab, São Paulo, Brazil.

Bedrocan Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 12;9:759. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00759. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

This meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any difference in efficacy between CBD-rich extracts compared to purified CBD products. The systematic search took place in February/2017 and updated in December/2017 using the keywords "epilepsy" or "Dravet" or "Lennox-Gastaut" or "CDKL5" combined with "Cannabis," "cannabinoid," "cannabidiol," or "CBD" resulting in 199 papers. The qualitative assessment resulted in 11 valid references, with an average impact factor of 8.1 (ranging from 1.4 to 47.8). The categorical data of a total of 670 patients were analyzed by Fischer test. The average daily dose ranged between 1 and 50 mg/kg, with treatment length from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.2 months). Two thirds of patients reported improvement in the frequency of seizures (399/622, 64%). There were more reports of improvement from patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (318/447, 71%) than patients treated with purified CBD (81/175, 46%), [corrected] with statistical significance ( < 0.0001). Nevertheless, when the standard clinical threshold of a "50% reduction or more in the frequency of seizures" was applied, only 39% of the individuals were considered "responders," and there was no difference ( = 0.52) [corrected] between treatments with CBD-rich extracts (122/330, 37%) [corrected] and purified CBD (94/223, 42%). Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day). [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] The reports of mild (158/216 76% vs. 148/447, 33% < 0.001) and severe (41/155, 26% vs. 23/328, 7% < 0.0001) [corrected] adverse effects were more frequent in products containing purified CBD than in CBD-rich extracts. CBD-rich extracts seem to present a better therapeutic profile than purified CBD, at least in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy. The roots of this difference is likely due to synergistic effects of CBD with other phytocompounds (aka Entourage effect), but this remains to be confirmed in controlled clinical studies.

摘要

这篇荟萃分析论文描述了对使用基于大麻二酚(CBD)的产品治疗难治性癫痫的观察性临床研究的分析。除了试图确定此类产品的安全性和有效性外,我们还研究了是否有足够的证据表明富含CBD的提取物与纯化的CBD产品在疗效上存在差异。系统检索于2017年2月进行,并于2017年12月更新,使用关键词“癫痫”或“德雷维特综合征”或“伦诺克斯 - 加斯托综合征”或“CDKL5”与“大麻”、“大麻素”、“大麻二酚”或“CBD”组合,共得到199篇论文。定性评估产生了11篇有效参考文献,平均影响因子为8.1(范围从1.4到47.8)。通过费舍尔检验分析了总共670名患者的分类数据。平均每日剂量在1至50毫克/千克之间,治疗时长为3至12个月(平均6.2个月)。三分之二的患者报告癫痫发作频率有所改善(399/622,64%)。与使用纯化CBD治疗的患者(81/175,46%)相比,使用富含CBD提取物治疗的患者报告改善的更多(318/447,71%),[校正后]具有统计学意义(<0.0001)。然而,当应用“癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多”的标准临床阈值时,只有39%的个体被视为“有反应者”,并且富含CBD提取物治疗(122/330,37%)[校正后]与纯化CBD治疗(94/223,42%)之间没有差异(=0.52)[校正后]。使用富含CBD提取物治疗的患者报告的平均剂量(6.0毫克/千克/天)[剂量错误已校正]低于使用纯化CBD的患者(25.3毫克/千克/天)。[剂量错误已校正]含有纯化CBD的产品中轻度(158/216,76%对148/447,33%,<0.001)和重度(41/155,26%对23/328,7%,<0.0001)[校正后]不良反应的报告比富含CBD提取物的产品更频繁。至少在这群难治性癫痫患者中,富含CBD的提取物似乎比纯化的CBD具有更好的治疗效果。这种差异的根源可能是CBD与其他植物化合物的协同作用(即整体效应),但这仍有待在对照临床研究中得到证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验