• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子医疗数据评估妊娠期药物安全性研究中选择偏倚的方法。

Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data.

机构信息

Faculté de pharmacie Université de Montréal Montreal Canada.

Hôpital du Sacré Cœur de Montréal Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal Montreal Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Sep 21;6(5):e00426. doi: 10.1002/prp2.426. eCollection 2018 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/prp2.426
PMID:30258633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6149369/
Abstract

Electronic health data are routinely used for population drug studies. Due to the ethical dilemma in carrying out experimental drug studies on pregnant women, the effects of medication usage during pregnancy on fetal and maternal outcomes are largely evaluated using this data collection medium. One major limitation in this type of study is the delayed inclusion of pregnancies in the cohort. For example, in the province of Quebec, Canada, a major pregnancy cohort only captured pregnancies after 20 weeks gestation. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate three methods that can be used to assess the extent of selection bias due to the delayed inclusion of pregnancies. We use causal directed acyclic graphs to explain the source of this selection bias. In an example involving a cohort of pregnant asthmatic women reconstructed from the linkage of administrative health databases from the province of Quebec, we use numerical derivations, a simulation study and a sensitivity analysis to investigate the potential for bias and loss of power due to the delayed inclusion. We find that this selection bias can be partially mitigated by controlling for variables related to (spontaneous or therapeutic) abortion and the outcome of interest. The three proposed methods allow for the pre and post hoc ascertainment of the bias. While delayed pregnancy inclusion selection bias (which includes "live birth bias") can produce substantial bias in pregnancy drug studies, all three methods are effective at producing estimates of the size of the bias.

摘要

电子健康数据通常用于人群药物研究。由于在孕妇中进行实验性药物研究存在伦理困境,因此,药物在怀孕期间使用对胎儿和产妇结局的影响主要通过这种数据收集媒介进行评估。这种类型的研究存在一个主要限制,即妊娠的延迟纳入。例如,在加拿大魁北克省,一个主要的妊娠队列仅捕获妊娠 20 周后的妊娠。本研究旨在展示三种可用于评估因妊娠延迟纳入而导致选择偏倚程度的方法。我们使用有向无环图来解释这种选择偏倚的来源。在一个涉及从魁北克省的行政健康数据库中链接重建的妊娠哮喘妇女队列的例子中,我们使用数值推导、模拟研究和敏感性分析来研究由于延迟纳入而导致的偏倚和效能损失的可能性。我们发现,通过控制与(自发性或治疗性)流产和感兴趣的结局相关的变量,可以部分减轻这种选择偏倚。这三种方法都可以在研究前和研究后确定偏倚的大小。虽然妊娠延迟纳入选择偏倚(包括“活产偏倚”)可能会对妊娠药物研究产生实质性的偏倚,但这三种方法都能有效地估计偏倚的大小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671b/6149369/8c9d001246dd/PRP2-6-e00426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671b/6149369/1d8a70415220/PRP2-6-e00426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671b/6149369/8c9d001246dd/PRP2-6-e00426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671b/6149369/1d8a70415220/PRP2-6-e00426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671b/6149369/8c9d001246dd/PRP2-6-e00426-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data.使用电子医疗数据评估妊娠期药物安全性研究中选择偏倚的方法。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Sep 21;6(5):e00426. doi: 10.1002/prp2.426. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Relationship between maternal asthma, its severity and control and abortion.母亲哮喘、严重程度和控制与流产之间的关系。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):908-15. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det024. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
4
Bias from restricting to live births when estimating effects of prescription drug use on pregnancy complications: A simulation.估计处方药使用对妊娠并发症的影响时因局限于活产而产生的偏倚:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):307-314. doi: 10.1002/pds.4387. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.孕激素预防流产的作用:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD013792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013792.pub2.
6
Mefloquine for preventing malaria in pregnant women.甲氟喹预防孕妇疟疾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 21;3(3):CD011444. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011444.pub2.
7
Agreement between administrative databases and medical charts for pregnancy-related variables among asthmatic women.哮喘女性中与妊娠相关变量的行政数据库与病历之间的一致性
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Apr;17(4):345-53. doi: 10.1002/pds.1558.
8
Association Between Incident Exposure to Benzodiazepines in Early Pregnancy and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion.孕早期苯二氮䓬类药物的暴露与自然流产风险之间的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):948-957. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0963.
9
Immortal time bias in drug safety cohort studies: spontaneous abortion following nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug exposure.药物安全性队列研究中的不朽时间偏倚:非甾体抗炎药暴露后的自然流产。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):307.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
10
Risk of perinatal mortality associated with inhaled corticosteroid use for the treatment of asthma during pregnancy.妊娠期哮喘使用吸入性皮质类固醇治疗与围产儿死亡风险的相关性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Oct;126(4):772-777.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.018.

引用本文的文献

1
A potential outcomes approach to defining and estimating gestational age-specific exposure effects during pregnancy.一种定义和估计妊娠期间特定胎龄暴露效应的潜在结果方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):300-314. doi: 10.1177/09622802211065158. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Medicines prescribed for asthma, discontinuation and perinatal outcomes, including breastfeeding: A population cohort analysis.用于哮喘的药物、停药和围产期结局,包括母乳喂养:一项人群队列分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0242489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242489. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety of Medications in Pregnant Women: An Opportunity to Use Database Studies.孕妇用药安全:利用数据库研究的契机。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4194. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Antidepressant use during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations in a cohort of depressed pregnant women: an updated analysis of the Quebec Pregnancy Cohort.孕期抑郁症患者队列中孕期使用抗抑郁药与严重先天性畸形风险:魁北克孕期队列的最新分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e013372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013372.
3
Methodological considerations in assessing the effectiveness of antidepressant medication continuation during pregnancy using administrative data.
使用行政数据评估孕期抗抑郁药物持续治疗有效性的方法学考量
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):934-42. doi: 10.1002/pds.3798. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Does selection bias explain the obesity paradox among individuals with cardiovascular disease?心血管疾病患者的肥胖悖论是否可以用选择偏倚来解释?
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 May;25(5):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Effects of gestational age at enrollment in pregnancy exposure registries.纳入妊娠暴露登记时的孕周影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):343-52. doi: 10.1002/pds.3731. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Beginning and duration of pregnancy in automated health care databases: review of estimation methods and validation results.自动化医疗保健数据库中妊娠的开始与持续时间:估计方法及验证结果综述
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):335-42. doi: 10.1002/pds.3743. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Bias from conditioning on live birth in pregnancy cohorts: an illustration based on neurodevelopment in children after prenatal exposure to organic pollutants.妊娠队列中基于活产的偏倚:以产前暴露于有机污染物后儿童的神经发育为例
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;44(1):345-54. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu249. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
8
Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting β₂-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.哮喘孕妇使用长效β₂-激动剂和吸入皮质类固醇联合治疗与高剂量吸入皮质类固醇单一疗法相比的先天畸形风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan;135(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.051. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
9
Learning from big health care data.从大型医疗保健数据中学习。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2161-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1401111.
10
Identification and estimation of survivor average causal effects.幸存者平均因果效应的识别与估计
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 20;33(21):3601-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.6181. Epub 2014 May 29.