Harper Kristie J, Arendts Glenn, Geelhoed Elizabeth A, Barton Annette D, Celenza Antonio
Occupational Therapy Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, G Block Lower Ground Floor, Nedlands, 6009, Perth, Australia.
School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Apr;25(2):244-250. doi: 10.1111/jep.13041. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: There is considerable uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing secondary falls in older people presenting to emergency departments (ED). The objective was to complete an economic evaluation of a brief educational ED intervention aimed at preventing falls in older people post discharge.
A net cost analysis was completed from the health system perspective, using data from a controlled clinical trial, where an education intervention was compared to standard care. Patients aged 65 and older presenting to the ED with any diagnosis were enrolled. The costs, using Australian dollars (A$) at 2015 values, included resources required for the intervention and any health care cost incurred in the 6-month follow-up period (time horizon). Cost data were sourced through institutional billing records and liaison with the patient and their general practitioner. Mean costs and differences were analysed through nonparametric bootstrapping.
The total costs in the control group (n = 201) were A$1 576 496 compared to A$1 292 130 in the intervention group (n = 211). The mean net cost per patient was A$7749 and A$6187 (P = 0.68) respectively resulting in a mean difference of A$1580 per patient in the intervention group (95% CI: A$-2806 to A$6150). Patients who presented to the ED with a fall diagnosis were reviewed through subgroup analysis. Total costs for patients who presented with a fall in the control group (n = 69) were A$708 995 compared to A$512 874 in the intervention group (n = 97). The mean net cost per patient was A$10 326 and A$5343 respectively (P = 0.33) with an overall saving of A$4624 per patient in the intervention group (95% CI: A$-2868 to A$15 426).
A brief intervention had no net cost benefit across the whole study population, but is more cost effective in older people presenting to the ED with a fall.
原理、目的和目标:对于急诊科(ED)中老年人预防二次跌倒干预措施的成本效益存在很大不确定性。目的是完成一项针对急诊科简短教育干预措施的经济评估,该措施旨在预防老年人出院后跌倒。
从卫生系统角度完成了一项净成本分析,使用来自一项对照临床试验的数据,将教育干预措施与标准护理进行比较。纳入了65岁及以上因任何诊断就诊于急诊科的患者。成本以2015年价值的澳元(A$)计算,包括干预所需资源以及6个月随访期(时间范围)内产生的任何医疗保健成本。成本数据通过机构计费记录以及与患者及其全科医生的联系获取。通过非参数自抽样分析平均成本和差异。
对照组(n = 201)的总成本为1576496澳元,而干预组(n = 211)为1292130澳元。每位患者的平均净成本分别为7749澳元和6187澳元(P = 0.68),导致干预组每位患者的平均差异为1580澳元(95%置信区间:-2806澳元至6150澳元)。通过亚组分析对因跌倒诊断就诊于急诊科的患者进行了评估。对照组中因跌倒就诊的患者(n = 69)的总成本为708995澳元,而干预组(n = 97)为512874澳元。每位患者的平均净成本分别为10326澳元和5343澳元(P = 0.33),干预组每位患者总体节省4624澳元(95%置信区间:-2868澳元至15426澳元)。
简短干预措施在整个研究人群中没有净成本效益,但对于因跌倒就诊于急诊科的老年人更具成本效益。