Liao Sam, Wu Eric L, Neidlin Michael, Li Zhiyong, Simpson Benjamin, Gregory Shaun D
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Innovative Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Artif Organs. 2018 Oct;42(10):943-953. doi: 10.1111/aor.13330. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
Rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are commonly operated at a constant speed, attenuating blood flow pulsatility. Speed modulation of rotary LVADs has been demonstrated to improve vascular pulsatility and pump washout. The effect of LVAD speed modulation on intraventricular flow dynamics is not well understood, which may have an influence on thromboembolic events. This study aimed to numerically evaluate intraventricular flow characteristics with a speed modulated LVAD. A severely dilated anatomical left ventricle was supported by a HeartWare HVAD in a three-dimensional multiscale computational fluid dynamics model. Three LVAD operating scenarios were evaluated: constant speed and sinusoidal co- and counter-pulsation. In all operating scenarios, the mean pump speed was set to restore the cardiac output to 5.0 L/min. Co- and counter-pulsation was speed modulated with an amplitude of 750 rpm. The risk of thrombosis was evaluated based on blood residence time, ventricular washout, kinetic energy densities, and a pulsatility index map. Blood residence time for co-pulsation was on average 1.8 and 3.7% lower than constant speed and counter-pulsation mode, respectively. After introducing fresh blood to displace preexisting blood for 10 cardiac cycles, co-pulsation had 1.5% less old blood in comparison to counter-pulsation. Apical energy densities were 84 and 27% higher for co-pulsation in comparison to counter-pulsation and constant speed mode, respectively. Co-pulsation had an increased pulsatility index around the left ventricular outflow tract and mid-ventricle. Improved flow dynamics with co-pulsation was caused by increased E-wave velocities which minimized blood stasis. In the studied scenario and from the perspective of intraventricular flow dynamics, co-pulsation of rotary LVADs could minimize the risk of intraventricular thrombosis.
旋转式左心室辅助装置(LVAD)通常以恒定速度运行,从而减弱血流搏动性。已证明旋转式LVAD的速度调节可改善血管搏动性和泵冲洗效果。LVAD速度调节对心室内血流动力学的影响尚不清楚,这可能会对血栓栓塞事件产生影响。本研究旨在通过数值模拟评估速度调节型LVAD的心室内血流特征。在三维多尺度计算流体动力学模型中,用HeartWare HVAD支持严重扩张的解剖学左心室。评估了三种LVAD运行方案:恒定速度以及正弦同向和反向搏动。在所有运行方案中,将平均泵速设定为使心输出量恢复至5.0升/分钟。同向和反向搏动以750转/分钟的幅度进行速度调节。基于血液停留时间、心室冲洗、动能密度和搏动指数图评估血栓形成风险。同向搏动的血液停留时间平均分别比恒定速度和反向搏动模式低1.8%和3.7%。在引入新鲜血液以置换先前存在的血液10个心动周期后,与反向搏动相比,同向搏动的陈旧血液减少了1.5%。与反向搏动和恒定速度模式相比,同向搏动的心尖能量密度分别高出84%和27%。同向搏动在左心室流出道和心室中部周围的搏动指数增加。同向搏动改善的血流动力学是由E波速度增加引起的,这使血液淤积最小化。在所研究的方案中,从心室内血流动力学的角度来看旋转式LVAD的同向搏动可将心室内血栓形成的风险降至最低。