Suppr超能文献

An open, comparative study of sulbactam plus ampicillin vs. cefotaxime as initial therapy for serious soft tissue and bone and joint infections.

作者信息

Löffler L, Bauernfeind A, Keyl W, Hoffstedt B, Piergies A, Lenz W

出版信息

Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S593-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s593.

Abstract

In an open, randomized, comparative study, patients with bone, joint, or soft-tissue infections were treated with sulbactam sodium plus ampicillin (sulbactam/ampicillin, 1 g of sulbactam and 2 g of ampicillin three times a day) or with cefotaxime (2 g three times a day) for two weeks as initial therapy. Thirteen patients were entered into the sulbactam/ampicillin group and nine into the cefotaxime group. Two weeks after the end of therapy, clinical cure or improvement was observed in all 13 patients treated with sulbactam/ampicillin and in seven of nine patients treated with cefotaxime. Staphylococcus aureus was not eliminated from one patient in each group. Recurrence of S. aureus infection occurred in two patients in the cefotaxime group within two weeks after the end of therapy. No adverse effects warranting discontinuation of antibiotic therapy were observed. The combination of sulbactam sodium plus ampicillin was at least equivalent to cefotaxime for the initial treatment of acute serious soft tissue and bone and joint infections.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验