Maione Luca, Caviggioli Fabio, Vinci Valeriano, Lisa Andrea, Barbera Federico, Siliprandi Mattia, Battistini Andrea, Klinger Francesco, Klinger Marco
Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, University of Milan, Via Manzoni 56, 20090, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Plastic Surgery Unit, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Clinica San Carlo, University of Milan, Paderno Dugnano, MI, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1465-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1240-9. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
Breast augmentation surgery with implants is one of the most common aesthetic surgical procedures. Round and anatomical textured implants are employed very often, and fat grafting has proven to be a very useful complementary procedure in breast augmentation. Many authors report a more natural result with anatomical compared to round implants. Nevertheless, anatomical implants can be associated with complications such as implant rotation with subsequent shape distortion. In this article, we propose a combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting to obtain a natural result analyzing its impact on the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.
In this study, we report our personal approach on 31 consecutive patients undergoing primary aesthetic breast augmentation with high-profile round implants and fat grafting. We describe our personal technique of breast augmentation via the periareolar approach and fat grafting. We evaluated short- and medium-term aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction using a 10-point VAS scale.
We achieved in all cases high patient satisfaction and good aesthetic outcomes with a "natural" breast shape and a "smoothened" upper pole with low complication rates. The technique is safe, simple, fast, and it leads to high levels of patient satisfaction.
Our observations show that the combination of high-profile round implants and fat grafting in aesthetic breast augmentation can improve the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction as with anatomical implants eliminating the risk of implant rotation.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
植入式隆胸手术是最常见的美容外科手术之一。圆形和解剖形纹理植入物被广泛使用,脂肪移植已被证明是隆胸手术中非常有用的辅助手术。许多作者报告称,与圆形植入物相比,解剖形植入物的效果更自然。然而,解剖形植入物可能会出现并发症,如植入物旋转并随后导致形状变形。在本文中,我们提出将高凸圆形植入物与脂肪移植相结合,以获得自然的效果,并分析其对美学效果和患者满意度的影响。
在本研究中,我们报告了对31例连续接受高凸圆形植入物和脂肪移植进行初次美容隆胸手术患者的个人治疗方法。我们描述了通过乳晕周围入路进行隆胸和脂肪移植的个人技术。我们使用10分视觉模拟评分量表评估短期和中期的美学效果及患者满意度。
在所有病例中,我们均取得了较高的患者满意度和良好的美学效果,乳房形状“自然”,上极“平滑”,并发症发生率低。该技术安全、简单、快速,能带来较高的患者满意度。
我们的观察表明,在美容隆胸手术中,高凸圆形植入物与脂肪移植相结合可以改善美学效果和患者满意度,如同使用解剖形植入物一样,同时消除了植入物旋转的风险。
证据等级IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。